Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/proposal for Ireland Article: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:41, 18 June 2009 editDomer48 (talk | contribs)16,098 edits Comments against: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 19:42, 18 June 2009 edit undoDomer48 (talk | contribs)16,098 edits mNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


== Comments against == == Comments against ==
''Editors must not use sweeping claims or generalisations, and all claims must be supported by referenced sources. Please address one point at a time.

''
#GoodDay, no one has suggested deleting the Republic of Ireland article. This proposal is not about the RoI Article it's about the ] article. #GoodDay, no one has suggested deleting the Republic of Ireland article. This proposal is not about the RoI Article it's about the ] article.
#MickMacNee, you suggested an “Ireland which would cover all conceivable Ireland/Irish topics, such as History, Geography, Politics, Culture etc etc etc. This would include the content from the RoI Article, that's a merger, but this is not your proposal. This is a '''compilation''' of a number of proposals by a number of Editors. #MickMacNee, you suggested an “Ireland which would cover all conceivable Ireland/Irish topics, such as History, Geography, Politics, Culture etc etc etc. This would include the content from the RoI Article, that's a merger, but this is not your proposal. This is a '''compilation''' of a number of proposals by a number of Editors.

Revision as of 19:42, 18 June 2009

Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Comments against

Editors must not use sweeping claims or generalisations, and all claims must be supported by referenced sources. Please address one point at a time.

  1. GoodDay, no one has suggested deleting the Republic of Ireland article. This proposal is not about the RoI Article it's about the Ireland article.
  2. MickMacNee, you suggested an “Ireland which would cover all conceivable Ireland/Irish topics, such as History, Geography, Politics, Culture etc etc etc. This would include the content from the RoI Article, that's a merger, but this is not your proposal. This is a compilation of a number of proposals by a number of Editors.
  3. BritishWatcher. Nothing to discuss.
  4. Rockpocket. All that can be said is provide a Diff for the discussion were there was a consensus that "Ireland is ambiguous." No one can seem to find it. Provide sources to support this opinion per WP:V. Without Diff's there is nothing to discuss.

--Domer48'fenian' 19:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)