Revision as of 01:20, 20 June 2009 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: The Wolfram Alpha Society: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:22, 20 June 2009 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: The Wolfram Alpha Society: Additional information |
Line 71: |
Line 71: |
|
Re : The article was deleted because you did not establish why the group is notable enough per the ]. If you can provide ] from ] covering you group, then your group would meet the guidelines. |
|
Re : The article was deleted because you did not establish why the group is notable enough per the ]. If you can provide ] from ] covering you group, then your group would meet the guidelines. |
|
|
|
|
|
As for your question if I censored your post, I did not, obviously since I am answering your question. I did, however, due to privacy concerns, remove your email address which you can see so that you do not get spammed. I would prefer that you retract the implication that I would delete your group's article and censor your post because Wolfram Alpha is a "Misplaced Pages killer". I have no opinion on Wolfram Alpha. The reason the article was deleted was because of the reasons I previously stated. Your idea that I would censor your comment to me because I would see Wolfram Alpha as a competitor is a bit far fetched. -- ] (]) 01:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
As for your question if I censored your post, I did not, obviously since I am answering your question. I did, however, due to privacy concerns, remove your email address which you can see so that you do not get spammed. I would prefer that you retract the implication that I would delete your group's article and censor your post because Wolfram Alpha is a "Misplaced Pages killer". I have no opinion on Wolfram Alpha. The reason the article was deleted was because of the reasons I previously stated. Your idea that I would censor your comment to me because I would see Wolfram Alpha as a competitor is a bit far fetched. |
|
|
|
|
|
Since you are the creator of the site and group, I recommend that you review Misplaced Pages's policy on your ]. -- ] (]) 01:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC) |
As for your question if I censored your post, I did not, obviously since I am answering your question. I did, however, due to privacy concerns, remove your email address which you can see here so that you do not get spammed. I would prefer that you retract the implication that I would delete your group's article and censor your post because Wolfram Alpha is a "Misplaced Pages killer". I have no opinion on Wolfram Alpha. The reason the article was deleted was because of the reasons I previously stated. Your idea that I would censor your comment to me because I would see Wolfram Alpha as a competitor is a bit far fetched.