| Revision as of 07:57, 25 January 2002 editSzopen (talk | contribs)3,757 edits rhetorical question. I guess entry was made by HJ, right. | Revision as of 18:28, 25 January 2002 edit undoH.J. (talk | contribs)659 edits *to szopenNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Why, o why there is extraneus info about Copernic which should be in his own entry, there is info about eastern Prussia, and there is no info that Warmia was under Polish rule from 1466 to 17something? ] | Why, o why there is extraneus info about Copernic which should be in his own entry, there is info about eastern Prussia, and there is no info that Warmia was under Polish rule from 1466 to 17something? ] | ||
| --------------- | |||
| To ] | |||
| Warmia or Ermland in Prussia was an exempt bishopric. It was not under Polish rule. It was during that time a seperate state, ruled by the bishop as secular ruler, with highest authority | |||
| the emperor and the pope. And Copernicus lived most of his life in Ermland and died in Ermland. | |||
Revision as of 18:28, 25 January 2002
Why, o why there is extraneus info about Copernic which should be in his own entry, there is info about eastern Prussia, and there is no info that Warmia was under Polish rule from 1466 to 17something? szopen
To szopen
Warmia or Ermland in Prussia was an exempt bishopric. It was not under Polish rule. It was during that time a seperate state, ruled by the bishop as secular ruler, with highest authority
the emperor and the pope. And Copernicus lived most of his life in Ermland and died in Ermland.