Revision as of 00:34, 26 June 2009 editHobit (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,318 edits →Clash of Arms: keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:07, 27 June 2009 edit undoEdward321 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users36,434 edits →Clash of ArmsNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Keep'''. Winners of Origins Awards are generally considered notable. I've cited the appropriate pages for the two awards mentioned in the article. Article could easily be expanded with further discussion of their line (which I admit I'm only passingly familiar with). --] (]) 15:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Winners of Origins Awards are generally considered notable. I've cited the appropriate pages for the two awards mentioned in the article. Article could easily be expanded with further discussion of their line (which I admit I'm only passingly familiar with). --] (]) 15:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''keep''' I think the two Origins awards are enough. That said, expanding the article by describing the two games and redirecting them to here would be a good way to add more here. ] (]) 00:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | *'''keep''' I think the two Origins awards are enough. That said, expanding the article by describing the two games and redirecting them to here would be a good way to add more here. ] (]) 00:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' Winning a notable industry award twice is clear evidence of notability. ] (]) 01:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:07, 27 June 2009
Clash of Arms
- Clash of Arms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Hints of notability, but all a google search comes up is with places to buy the game, this wikipedia page, and the page fore the game's official website. — Dædαlus 00:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Winners of Origins Awards are generally considered notable. I've cited the appropriate pages for the two awards mentioned in the article. Article could easily be expanded with further discussion of their line (which I admit I'm only passingly familiar with). --Rindis (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- keep I think the two Origins awards are enough. That said, expanding the article by describing the two games and redirecting them to here would be a good way to add more here. Hobit (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Winning a notable industry award twice is clear evidence of notability. Edward321 (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)