| Revision as of 13:16, 23 June 2009 editRedrose64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators273,059 edits →Stereo recording: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:59, 30 June 2009 edit undoRedrose64 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators273,059 edits →Stereo recording: another comment | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Both of these imply that the vertical (hill-and-dale) is the difference, and the horizontal (lateral) is the sum. Other sections in the same article also have similar implications, as does the article ]. ] (]) 13:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | Both of these imply that the vertical (hill-and-dale) is the difference, and the horizontal (lateral) is the sum. Other sections in the same article also have similar implications, as does the article ]. ] (]) 13:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| I see that the user whose IP address is 209.53.181.141 has now reversed your exchange, so that the inconsistency has disappeared. I shall try to verify the actual situation. ] (]) 16:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:59, 30 June 2009
Client SMTP Authorization
Hi, somehow I missed that you edited Talk:Client SMTP Authorization back in November. I proposed to merge it into Certified Server Validation in April, and did this now (June). I'll move your older proposal to Talk:Certified Server Validation and redirect the talk page. --217.184.142.58 (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Stereo recording
Re your recent exchange of vertical and horizontal in Gramophone record - this creates a discrepancy with other sentences in the article, particularly two in the same section:
... a stereo cartridge reproduces the lateral grooves of monophonic recording ...
and
... the "difference" signal is usually of low power and thus less affected by the intrinsic distortion of hill-and-dale recording.
Both of these imply that the vertical (hill-and-dale) is the difference, and the horizontal (lateral) is the sum. Other sections in the same article also have similar implications, as does the article Phonograph. Redrose64 (talk) 13:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I see that the user whose IP address is 209.53.181.141 has now reversed your exchange, so that the inconsistency has disappeared. I shall try to verify the actual situation. Redrose64 (talk) 16:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)