Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:13, 12 July 2009

Archives

Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55

Thanks for dropping by! Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page. Messages here will often be read by a number of people. If you would rather discuss an issue privately, you can email me. I typically reply here, and, if I do, I will typically tag you in the message. If I haven't gotten back to you in a week and/or haven't gotten to something I said would, feel free to leave a reminder.

Margaret Smith

I have added a new rationale for Margaretsmith.jpg. Please give me your comments. Pepso2 (talk) 12:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Amazing Race

Dang it I should have thought of this. It's Canada Day here, so the earliest I'll be able to do anything will be this afternoon, and maybe not even then. I'll try giving your article a copyedit. Do you use IRC? Thanks, gENIUS101 12:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

image copyright

Thanks for informing me about the copyright requirements for my photo, I wasn't aware as I hadn't uploaded a photo before. I took the photo myself, so added the appropriate tags releasing rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moltovivo (talk • contribs) 22:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The Alarm (Raw album)

Why have the images been removed with comment? They are important to the article for demonstrating the difference between Country releases. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trevorsem (talk • contribs) 13:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Amazing Race

Just thought you should know: I've started work on Karl Moffat, but it's going slow. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, gENIUS101 14:59, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

I ran out of sources (after an hour-ish of searching), so I switched to X Division. Thanks, gENIUS101 17:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

That's been nommed, but the Roadblock is to write a GA(I saw it on another contestant's page. Btw, most other candidates pages are empty.). Do you want it, or do you want me to give it a try? Thanks, gENIUS101 19:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

After you do the Detour, you have to do the Roadblock (all in the same round). I saw what it was while I was checking on other people's progress. Thanks, gENIUS101 23:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Can't remember: the page has been deleted because they withdrew from the race. I don't think it's from scratch, but I'm not sure. And nope, I've never writtena GA before. Thanks, gENIUS101 00:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

It's always nice having an admin on your team. And nope, I've got nothing. Thanks, gENIUS101 14:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

2.0

Thanks. I'll try to remember to fix that in future. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Have a fun weekend. I'm going to start working on veggie bacon just as soon as I'm done with bacon cheeseburger. Perhaps in the new year? ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Scutellinia scutellata

Hello! Your submission of Scutellinia scutellata at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Killiondude (talk) 22:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Good work. It checks out with more than enough characters. I just passed it on T:TDYK. Killiondude (talk) 17:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

deadstar

okay, i'm fine with it. i also don't really care, it's just an old album _strak 22:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

tomas4191

how does 72through95rocketslogo.png add nothing to the page? it's part of history. many other sports teams articles have pictures of their previous logos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomas4191 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Image for delection

Hey, i don't know why most of photo is list of delection. especially photo of princess bopha devi. most of photo is take in 1960 as she first dance. the phorography is killed in khmer rouge. what do you want? i not sure and not understand about photo uploading. can you know me something about that? i am so confused.Engsamnang (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Photo i upload

so i make a wrong license for thoes photo, so you said thoes photo is under all right resverse. so can i put the all right resverse license to these photo better?Engsamnang (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#add edit-semi as a feature to "Uploader"?

To be sure what people are supporting, I made a separate subsection. You may wish to move your comment if you were supporting the expansion of uploader as well as the ability for admins to grant it. –xeno 15:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Poll

I was actually just looking for the remaining contestants to vote. Would you mind removing yours? Sorry about that. Cheers, iMatthew  at 20:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

request for article

Recently, we discussed NFCC and seemed to agree completely. Now, I have another request.

Please allow me access to Maria Belen Shapur or Maria Belen Chapur, which was deleted. In the AFD, I offered no opinion but did offer analytical advice. The result was delete and redirect instead of the commonly performed merge and redirect. I did not edit (or, if so, merely minor edits) the Shapur/Chapur article. However, I am a major editor for the article which the Chapur/Shapur article now redirects.

I would like to review the deleted article to see if there is any text that is suitable for the directed article that I do edit. Furthermore, there may be some good references. There is a problem that the deleted version may have been destroyed by those wanting delete (A problem in the article was that those favoring delete removed lots of text and those favoring retention added a lot of text, some of which is not encyclopedic). Perhaps the method would be to recreate the article, move it to my new sandbox, User:User F203/temporary sandbox for Maria B., then revert the article back to a redirect. If you do so, I remove the information from my sandbox immediately after review. Thank you. User F203 (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

I refused this request for restoration on my talkpage, and would think it better if this had been discussed with me first. Not going to re-delete if it is userfied, but think F203 should have mentioned it as it is otherwise a case of asking the other parent. Fritzpoll (talk) 22:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Per our offline discussion, I'm happy with the actions taken in this matter Fritzpoll (talk) 22:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

This episode suggests that Misplaced Pages may be inefficient and not user friendly. All hope is not lost as shown by your level headedness and kindness. Thank you for your assistance.

The end result is that two useful references have been salvaged. Those two reference (from reliable newspapers, not tabloids) have helped improve the other article. On the other hand, there was not "cut and paste" to make the people in favor of deletion mad. The other article remains focused on the subject matter and not Chapur.

On a different matter, I am beginning to see that you are quite well versed in NFCC. This is also an issue that interests me. User F203 (talk) 15:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

This episode suggests to me that you need to be clearer in your requests. You came to me to ask for a page so that you could review it, implying that you wanted simply to be able to see the article. I refused as this is not a reason for undeletion or userfication, and I only grant reasonable requests for userfication. Based on your request here, it seems you wanted the material to perform some merge or to extract the references. Had you said that to me, I would have done it without hesitation. Fritzpoll (talk) 15:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I am done now. Are you going to delete something now? The drawbacks of delete is that now my edit count will show that I edited on deleted pages. This might imply that I am stupid and choose bad articles to edit. Of course, this is not a major issue. If you really want to delete User:User F203/temporary sandbox for Maria B., you may. Please don't delete my other sandbox which has just a few phrases that any reasonable person wouldn't know that it is about Chapur but is a depository of 2-3 references. User F203 (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

User F203 (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 21

Just letting you know that a lot of images which you tagged as PUI and listed here were retagged as non-free and will probably be closed as keep shortly. Stifle (talk) 08:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

deletion, in general

At the risk of sounding thick, why do we delete things in WP? More specifically, if the topic is important enough to redirect, why not blank the page and redirect rather than a delete and redirect? I can see the reason for deleting if the topic is so obscure that we want to tear the page out of the encyclopedia and burn it. What's the rationale for delete and redirect? User F203 (talk) 18:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

self answered question: Maybe it's so any troublemakers who are trying to recreate the article have a harder time? Or maybe because, in theory, conservation is a good idea and a tiny bit of computer memory is freed up at the WP servers? User F203 (talk) 18:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Images at KH list

Talk:List_of_Kingdom_Hearts_media#Images, your thoughts/objections? Axem Titanium (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Mass deletion of image uploads needed

All this users image uploads need to be deleted , all images are originally from a pdf file of the Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan, their website isn't under a free license.

Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of image of Dianne Kohler Barnard MP

The image in question is free for use, as specified by the party's press kit. Please do not delete again.--Mulaudzi8 (talk) 10:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Well I have got the author personally uploading the image to Misplaced Pages Commons as free to use. That should be acceptable then? --Mulaudzi8 (talk) 20:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Scutellinia scutellata

On July 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Scutellinia scutellata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

rʨanaɢ /_contribs 14:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Tintin characters

Before you yet again delete all the images, perhaps you'll think of contacting the owners of Tintin: the ones who actually hold the copyrights. After all, if anyone would object to their use then it is them.

(Yes, I want to start contributing to Misplaced Pages again, but I would appreciate a little flexibility.)

Cheers, --Marktreut (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

FFD closures

I'm going to try my hand at doing more of them, I think; I have a good understanding of WP:NFCC but don't have any strong views about liberally or conservatively it should be read, which means that I don't participate much at WP:FFD (least of all in really heated debates, which are usually over how liberally or conservativey the criteria should be read). Anyway, thanks for your thanks - it's nice to know that admin drudgery is appreciated. Steve Smith (talk) (formerly Sarcasticidealist) 22:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Image

I find the hysteria about these images to be quite unnecessary and a little disturbing. This is a very low-resolution image that no news organization would ever use. Who, exactly, might be harmed, even with the wildest stretch of the imagination, by our use of it? That's a serious question, and I'd really appreciate an answer. Not a policy answer, not a bureaucratic answer, but a real one, the kind of answer that would be expected in a court of law. Who exactly might be harmed, and how? SlimVirgin 00:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I've replied on the article talk page. Sorry, I shouldn't have started the discussion in two places. SlimVirgin 00:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright vs. Tradeark

I agree that the images certainly "belong" to the organizations, but they are also trademarks and NOT copyrighted, which is the basic interpretation of "free". That is not to say that other restrictions don't apply, but that within Misplaced Pages, for purposes of identification, their uses are unrestricted. Outside Misplaced Pages, uses are restricted and that is noted on the image page. If anyone is going to misuse any image, outside of Misplaced Pages, that isn't really our concern. Lastly, apparently anything I propose, Hammersoft will a) take personally and b) oppose. I would appreciate if you would be so kind as to propose a Mediation so we can avoid future problems. — BQZip01 —  00:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I think this explains it better, but, in short, letters cannot be copyrighted. Trademarked, sure, but not copyrighted. — BQZip01 —  01:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:PD#Fonts: "Under U.S. law, typefaces and the characters they contain are considered to be utilitarian objects whose utility outweighs any merit that may exist in protecting their creative elements. As such, typefaces are exempt from copyright protection in the United States". This isn't a matter of convenience, but of law. Both the "E" and the "B" are part of larger typefaces and are simply excerpted from those. — BQZip01 —  01:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. Examples: Baltimore typeset Eagles typeset

Pls just respond here. Going back and forth is a pain. — BQZip01 —  06:12, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Those aren't fonts, any more than the picture I linked on your talk page is part of a font. J Milburn (talk) 11:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

The letters in them are characters of a typeset. Consider the following images:

Despite the obvious artistic input, these logos are still "set of letters...whose forms are related by repeating design elements...intended to be embodied in articles, whose intrinsic utilitarian function is for use in composing text or other cognizable combinations of characters". Indeed, they are typefaces and thus, per the above, ineligible for copyright. "Mere variations of typographic ornamentation, lettering, or coloring" are not eligible for copyright protection.

So, you would say that this is uncopyrightable? J Milburn (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

If this is a letter in a set of a font designed to be used as a letter, then, no, I don't think it is copyrightable, much as none of the above images are copyrightable. — BQZip01 —  19:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

And the letters used on the logo are from a font? What font? J Milburn (talk) 20:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

The same font used for the words in some of these logos: 1 2. The same goes for the IBM, Coca-cola, and Microsoft logos above. — BQZip01 —  22:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Freddy Krueger images

I've replied on all three, also, the edit notice is old, I was planning on changing it today; the guidelines are actually about having good faith and not attacking, which I have greatly respected in this message in response to your message which was a minor violation of the guidelines ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 14:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

You obviously didn't do your homework, if you see

• 1 2 3 (and for future reference, 4)

You can see my previously mentioned "troll" and I got into a minor fight, he forever burned calling me "trollish" into the revision history, I merely did the edit notice for venting ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 14:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

"If I've attacked you, you've certainly attacked other editors, in labelling them "trolls"" recall? ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 14:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Just letting you know, I would never begin to think of calling an editor a troll, he through the grenade, I cleared the air. ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 14:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Since then, me and Bignole have lightened up. Also, I do have a mini version of the discussion in one of my archives; and if ignoring messages from people I hate (not dislike) is senseless that smack me in the face! ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 15:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

If you can be an admin, I'm sure I can be, I actually went through this (just making sure) ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 16:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

How is the above discussion an "I win, you suck!" comment? I was letting you know information that keeps you up to date. I don't understand why you'd empty the category of it's media ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 16:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Let's see who will be enjoying this snack ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 16:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

You betcha! We're just one big, happy WikiFamily! Like I said previously to Bignole during our fight, I hate how personal editing gets. I think being editor friends leads to ganging up and not the best results for the WP. What is this MySpace? ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 16:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I have to go now, talk to you later, bye ---Scarce |||| Talk -Contrib.--- 16:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Haile selassie.jpg

Thanks for the heads-up, we all have off days. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Worldfocus_WNET.jpg

Thank you so very much on advising me on this picture. i have now changed the license to {{Non-free television screenshot}} thanks once again. i guess since i took the screen shot, i thought it fell under self ownership....

((User;BBCNYC)) 17:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)((User:BBCNYC))(talk) 17:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)((User:BBCNYC))

Worldfocus_WNET.jpg

How Do I Create One For this File? And If I Do Will The Alert Be taken off?

((User;BBCNYC)) 17:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)((user:BBCNYC))

Non-free images on July 2009 Ürümqi riots

Thanks for stepping in with the images on this article. I started discussions on both images, at Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots#Image and Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots#Another image, and I would appreciate your comments there if you have time. Obviously neither image is allowed by our guidelines, and in any other case I would not hesitate to remove them and delete them (since it's so obvious), but I have been so involved in this article already that it's probably better I let someone else do it; if I removed or deleted the images myself then there could be, at best, a lot of ANI drama from some disgruntled editor who does not understand WP policies, or, at worst, some of the thousands of people reading this article today might start believing that Misplaced Pages is controlled by some power-hungry admin abusing his power (me).

Thanks, rʨanaɢ /_contribs 22:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

The problem is that the uploader (not of the image you removed, but of a different one) is trying to link to an external copy of his copyvio image; see here. He doesn't know how to format images properly so it doesn't display (this must be the first time that an editor's refusal to read the WP tutorial has actually worked out in my favor!), but the external link is still there—he seems to think that way he can get around the rules and keep his image linked even after it's deleted from WP. I have removed the link once or twice already, and he keeps restoring it. I can always report him at AN3 (although, to be honest, that's a noticeboard I have little faith in anymore) if he keeps reverting people other than just me. rʨanaɢ /_contribs 22:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

In terms of the other image (not the one mentioned directly above, but the other one, see my response on the article's talk page. Perhaps a collage would work better, but either way, CCTV's coverage of this event differs significantly from previous such occurrences, and as China's primary television station and purveyor of news, that is a very notable fact. The image is about CCTV's coverage, not just a way to illustrate the article (though, like I said, perhaps a collage or some other image would better increase the readers' understanding of this significance - I'm completely open for changing/trading the image). Otebig (talk) 22:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

J Milburn, I'm about to be away from the computer for a few hours, but just so you know... I am getting more and more concerned about File:Rebiya-use-old-fake-photo.jpg, as the editor is starting to add it to other articles (I guess now that he realizes he's fighting a losing battle at the main one). I'm starting to think that, because of the controversial nature and the number of people paying attention to this now, it might be necessary to delete the image faster than normal, or to block the editor (he hasn't yet technically violated 3RR so AN3 might not be helpful). The only good news for now is that he doesn't know how to add images properly, so so far all he can do is add a URL. rʨanaɢ /_contribs 22:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Rjanag is indeed getting very concerned about that image, which showed two valid URLs, which will expose Rebiya Kadeer's false justification for the massacre in Urumuqi. Specifically, Kadeer used the photo to prove that "Chinese deployed army and military into the scene" and "they actually beat" the demonstrators. Rjanag tried to feed false information and tried to suppress the image, the use of which clearly falls under the fair-use doctrine. See 17 U.S.C. S 106. ChinaHistorian (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Uploads

I added the images in an appropriate place in the appropriate article. The Amon Amarth one is in the "Members" section of the article, and added the General Grievous one in the Revenge of the Sith section. Marauder09 (talk) 22:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Signpost: 6 July 2009

• News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
• Misplaced Pages in the news: Misplaced Pages and kidnapping, new comedy series
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Children of Michael Jackson

Hi. I have added a Proposal for Deletion and a Speedy Delete template to this article. Each time the template is deleted without any discussion. I understand your removal of the Speedy Delete, I was just trying to initiate a discussion/consensus, which is impossible if the editor/author keeps deleting the template. Thanks MrMarmite (talk) 12:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for advice. Am trying to do so now. Seem to be doing something wrong though :( cheers MrMarmite (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Memorial image

Could you please ask that the Jackson image be deleted because of invalid fair use (i.e. images for deletion), rather than as an orphan? It is only an orphan because you keep removing it, so it's somewhat unfair to use that as a reason to delete it. I'd be interested in seeing whether others agree about the fair-use issue. SlimVirgin 14:20, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Can you direct me to which part of the fair-use policy it violates? SlimVirgin 14:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

RE:Fair-use rationale

I have added the fair-use rationale as requested. - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 15:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Adam Wilson (The Young and the Restless)

Could you wait and not take any images off the article until it is decided which images should be kept? http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion#Adam_Wilson_images Thanks. Candyo32 (talk) 15:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I object your accusation that I am threatening you and I ask that you to retract it. As for what they are adding, I inlucded a link in the edit summary to the community discussion here. - Epson291 (talk) 17:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

If you believe I am threatening you I have no interest to carry on this discussion with you through here. - Epson291 (talk) 17:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I will reiterate, I will not be carrying on this discussion through here on your talk page, I have already responded to the FFD section. - Epson291 (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Soap Operas states that in the template that if there are two portrayers, if an image is avaiable then to use both images of actors. I don't understand why having this is such a problem.Candyo32 (talk) 18:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Archives

As a matter of fact, I signed up with MiszaBot to archive today, but it might take a little while. - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 15:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Status indicator

How do you get that status indicator on your talk page? I'd like it for mine. - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 15:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

And, also sadly, it doesn't work on IE (which I have). - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 19:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

I've actually got it to work in IE 8 on Windows Vista, but how do you show it on your talk page, etc. - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 19:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Drugstore Artwork+photos

Dear J Milburn I am the founding member of band Drugstore. Here are a few notes to clarify some of the recent uploads.

I have written permission from photographer Andy Willsher that band is allowed to use the following pictures, for any purposes, public or promotional. (just not sure if I need to add his name to the picture, any help welcome)- PICTURES: http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Drugstore_band_1.jpg File:Drugstore isabel monteiro.jpg File:Drugstore.jpg File:Isabel monteiro drugstore.jpg

I'm tracking down original protographer for the following pictures, so will remove from page, until correct source is established. PICTURES: File:Daron Robinson & Mike Chilynski.jpg File:Drugstore band Daron Robinson 2.jpg Drugstore_band_Drummer_Mike_Chylinski.jpg

The photographer, Lex Gatineau, has also given the band full permission to use her material for public and promotional purposes(Lex is a member of drugstore's fan club), PICTURE: File:Isabel monteiro drugstore d.jpg

All the artwork from every drugstore release was created by myself, but there is no need to credit, as it is already fairly visible in every single/album we ever released.PICTURES: File:Mondo2.jpg File:Drugstore-Starcrossed.jpg File:Alive.jpg Lovelyshopper (talk) 17:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

matiastellez.jpg

Hi, I have permission from the author, he will send an email asap confirming that. Can we not delete it in the meantime?Bergenblogger (talk) 19:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

hello

hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.198.57.146 (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, can I help you with anything? J Milburn (talk) 21:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi. You post me a message for a speedy deletion of the Grece 1ere Guerre balkanique.png file in use to the 1st Balkan War article. This file is a careful rework by me of the Grèce 1ere Guerre balkanique.png map created by the user Cédric Boissière. I reworked the map make it more historically accurate and about the accuracy of my rework there are no complains by the users that in the past months co-edited the article. So I consider it worth the try. Anyway now I am not sure what to do about. Do I have to mention that in the copyright tag or I have to contact the user Cédric Boissière for a permission of my map-editing? Regards, --Factuarius (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Vinten Logo.jpg)

Hi you've contacted me on my talk page about the logo. This is my first article on Wiki so your help is really appreciated! I've copied the logo from the web where it is widely available and recently added a rational for use . Is the problem that the logo is not attached to a published article and if so do I have to remove it until the article that I'm creating on Vinten is finished? Thanks Somersall (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

List of The Tribe characters

Hi. You have removed all the pictures from the list of The Tribe characters. Are there no pictures allowed on characters lists? One of the trademark of The Tribe was the costumes and make-up of all the different characters. What's the proper way to depict some of the specific "fashion" on the show? Thanks for your help. ErisDysnomia (talk) 09:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Kasuga Maru.gif

Thanks for helping me figure out how to handle the problem this image presents. Obviously, I thought that posting at Talk:Kasuga Maru was compliant with fair use .... Now I'm better informed because you invested a little bit of time. --Tenmei (talk) 20:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Lorenzetti

Hi JMilburn, is the threat to delete this image really necessary? -

given that it is it is from the middle ages and its in pd I don't understand this...I understand the tag says it needs a source - but for what reason? WP:UCS says let it be...The tagger seems hysterical, please calm him down, thanks...Modernist (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Xbox Console pic

Hi. I have seen your message on my talk, about File:Xbox Console.jpg. The image is from that link (the link is in the description page), and I edited it using Microsoft Paint. I made the image smaller, and I made the console to cover the whole pic. What shall I do now? (NOTICE: Please reply me on my talk) --AimalCool (talk) 10:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

So what is the standard copyright of that image? (please always reply on my talk) --AimalCool (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I selected the wrong copyright. I didn't wanted to choose Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 AimalCool (talk) 10:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe its free. But I wanted to choose Public Domain as the copyright for both XBox console.jpg and the GCblue.jpg --AimalCool (talk) 11:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I made a mistake. But what do I have to do now? --AimalCool (talk) 11:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete those pics? They are free, like I just said! --AimalCool (talk) 11:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

You know, I'm someone that always makes mistakes, yeah, I just said they are not free, which was a mistake. These pics are free. But I need to go, bye. Tomorrow, I should be online here on Misplaced Pages, and I will reply you. --AimalCool (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Western painting

Re. your edit on NFC, you might like to comment at Talk:Western_painting#Number_of_images. Ty 12:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Antanas Smetona 2.jpg

Then how come it is a featured picture?? --BorgQueen (talk) 16:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok, please do use the deletion template and I will replace the image. --BorgQueen (talk) 16:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Several Images up for deletion

Hi,

I have noticed that you have placed several images, on some of the pages I am working on, up for deletion. Sorry that I did not provide sufficient detail about the right to use these images, I am currently working for the person running these websites, Andrew Davis, of which these images have been taken from. The wikipedia pages are about these websites, as well as a biographical page of Andrew Davis.

The files in question are:

July 9

http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Logotwks.png

July 10

http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Myspaceandrew-006631-199x300.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Twkssnippet.JPG http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Andrew-227x230.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/File:James172x230.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Rickie-153x229.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Melvin-172x230.jpg

You can contact Andrew regarding this matter on andrew@twks.co.uk

If you need more proof of ownership, please respond in how I could show this.

Many Thanks

17:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cass81 (talk • contribs)  

Don't you check Wiki users operating time record ??

Until now I was working on here ... fixed the "fair use", and inserted a image to a proper place.

But you are not staying for a moment, and indicated to me a little while ago again about "fair use" of a image uploaded.

Don't you check recorded time??

Why are you short-tempered like this ??

Take it easy please.

-- Kookyunii (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your reply on my talk page

I talked to you about this page "File:KonKukUniv Logo3.jpg"‎. Before you ask again, make sure yourself what the problem is about a questioner please.

-- Kookyunii (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File:German Soviet.jpg

Undoing another admin's action once is not wheelwarring. You have a right to undue my actions, and I'll not accuse you of wheelwarring - please treat others with the same expect and good faith as you want to be treated yourself. FYI, I have contacted Cavalry some time ago with regards to that issue. Since his argument is that FUR was invalid, and most editors who commented there argued that it is quite valid, this seems to me like a good case to look up to community. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)