| Revision as of 04:28, 13 July 2009 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,422 edits →Gerfnit: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:58, 13 July 2009 edit undoAbductive (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers128,626 edits →Gerfnit: unanimity not acheivedNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete''' as a non-notable fictional character in a non-notable book by a non-notable author, and why on earth has this been flagged for rescue - posting of stuff like this to ARS is one reason why many editors, myself included, do not read through ARS logs to actually work on what can be rescued. --<span style="color:#B13E0F">SpacemanSpiff</span> {<sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-6.6ex;">]</sub> 03:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as a non-notable fictional character in a non-notable book by a non-notable author, and why on earth has this been flagged for rescue - posting of stuff like this to ARS is one reason why many editors, myself included, do not read through ARS logs to actually work on what can be rescued. --<span style="color:#B13E0F">SpacemanSpiff</span> {<sup>]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-6.6ex;">]</sub> 03:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per all above, and spicy drinks to all. This could have been speedied, couldn't it? ] (]) 04:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per all above, and spicy drinks to all. This could have been speedied, couldn't it? ] (]) 04:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| **Somebody thought this topic was notable enough to tag it for rescue. Perhaps if it had been proposed for deletion via speedy or prod, the same person would have removed the tag, necessitating an AfD anyway. ] (]) 04:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:58, 13 July 2009
Gerfnit
- Gerfnit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable fictional character. 52 Google hits.] Abductive (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 10:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - NN character in NN work by NN author. Happy Editing! — 138.88.7.48 (talk · contribs) 13:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete As neither the self-published novel nor even the author is remotely notable, the character certainly is not.DGG (talk) 00:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per DGG. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 01:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per DGG ;) if he says del, it should be speedied. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 03:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete as a non-notable fictional character in a non-notable book by a non-notable author, and why on earth has this been flagged for rescue - posting of stuff like this to ARS is one reason why many editors, myself included, do not read through ARS logs to actually work on what can be rescued. --SpacemanSpiff { Hobbes 03:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per all above, and spicy drinks to all. This could have been speedied, couldn't it? Drmies (talk) 04:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Somebody thought this topic was notable enough to tag it for rescue. Perhaps if it had been proposed for deletion via speedy or prod, the same person would have removed the tag, necessitating an AfD anyway. Abductive (talk) 04:58, 13 July 2009 (UTC)