Misplaced Pages

Talk:South Ossetia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:04, 8 July 2009 editMiszaBot I (talk | contribs)234,552 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to Talk:South Ossetia/Archive 1.← Previous edit Revision as of 12:03, 13 July 2009 edit undoA Balanced View (talk | contribs)16 edits Evidence of illegal state: new sectionNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


please see ]. --]<sup>]</sup> 04:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC) please see ]. --]<sup>]</sup> 04:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

== Evidence of illegal state ==

I have provided evidence that this state is illegal, above the fact that the US/Nato and international community including the UN fail to recognize South Ossetia & Abkhazia. A distinguished and highly revered and respected historian who is an absolute genius and knows everything about everything on the Balkans (better than locals even) published this report.<br>
If you read it, he weighs out all the evidence as to both how Kosova is legal and the two Georgian states are not. It is now on the article and it is fully reliable and true. When I find more as such, I'll add them. ] (]) 12:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:03, 13 July 2009

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the South Ossetia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconGeorgia (country)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country)
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOssetia (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ossetia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OssetiaWikipedia:WikiProject OssetiaTemplate:WikiProject OssetiaOssetia
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconRussia High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

comments

I would say that the article is not neutral and rather inaccurate. The author comments that though it is not recognized, it deserves a separate box. It could have its separate box but the question is to call everything their internationally recognized names. So It is not a republic but a breakaway region and it is ridiculous to put all the state symbols there.

Also a short comment on the history section. Before the Russian anexation of Georgia "South Ossetia" did not simply exist. There were no Ossetian settlements in that region and were artificially created later on.

Date of indepedence

Did South Ossetia declare independence on November 28, 1991, as the main Misplaced Pages article on the country claims, or on September 20, 1990, as is frequently cited in scholarly articles and in this Misplaced Pages article Georgian-Ossetian_conflict#Origins_of_the_Conflict? It is also worth noting that September 20 appears to be the day chosen by the South Ossetian state as its independence day.

Old citation needed tags

Should that Roki tunnel one at the end that says that South Ossetia gets a third of it's income from the Roki tunnel also come off?

Administrative divisions of Georgia

I think we should remove {{Administrative divisions of Georgia}} template. Reasons:

  • 1) it doesn't link the article;
  • 2) there is no such thing as South Ossetia according to the Georgian Constitution. Georgian officials call it "South Ossetia". — Taamu (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Agreed and done. --Xeeron (talk) 15:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Dispute tag

please see File talk:Alania 10 12.png. --Kober 04:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Evidence of illegal state

I have provided evidence that this state is illegal, above the fact that the US/Nato and international community including the UN fail to recognize South Ossetia & Abkhazia. A distinguished and highly revered and respected historian who is an absolute genius and knows everything about everything on the Balkans (better than locals even) published this report.
If you read it, he weighs out all the evidence as to both how Kosova is legal and the two Georgian states are not. It is now on the article and it is fully reliable and true. When I find more as such, I'll add them. A Balanced View (talk) 12:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Categories: