Misplaced Pages

Fathers' rights movement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:01, 15 July 2009 editSlp1 (talk | contribs)Administrators27,803 edits →Child support: completing this section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:02, 15 July 2009 edit undoSlp1 (talk | contribs)Administrators27,803 edits →Child support: ceNext edit →
Line 65: Line 65:
Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that child support should be terminated under certain conditions, such as if the custodial parent limits access to the children by moving away against the wishes of the other parent, gives fraudulent testimony, or if paternity fraud is discovered,<ref name = "Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement">{{cite web | title = Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement June, 2001 | month = June | year = 2001 | url = http://www.fatherhoodcoalition.org/cpf/2001/CSGuidelineRecommendations2001.htm | accessdate = 2007-04-15 }}</ref> adding that two men should not have to pay child support for the same child.<ref name = "Fathers Are Capable Too - Comments on Child Support Guidelines"/> Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that child support should be terminated under certain conditions, such as if the custodial parent limits access to the children by moving away against the wishes of the other parent, gives fraudulent testimony, or if paternity fraud is discovered,<ref name = "Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement">{{cite web | title = Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement June, 2001 | month = June | year = 2001 | url = http://www.fatherhoodcoalition.org/cpf/2001/CSGuidelineRecommendations2001.htm | accessdate = 2007-04-15 }}</ref> adding that two men should not have to pay child support for the same child.<ref name = "Fathers Are Capable Too - Comments on Child Support Guidelines"/>


Stephen Baskerville states that it is often difficult for fathers in financial hardship or who take on a larger caregiving role with their children to have their child support payments lowered. They also state that unemployment is the primary cause of child support arrears, and further state that these arrearages make the father subject to arrest and imprisonment without due process.<ref name = "Is there really a fatherhood crisis?">{{cite web | last = Baskerville | first = S | authorlink = | title = Is There Really A Fatherhood Crisis? | publisher = The Independent Institute | year = 2004 | url = http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=13&articleID=35 | accessdate = 2007-05-01 }}</ref> Stephen Baskerville states that it is often difficult for fathers in financial hardship or who take on a larger caregiving role with their children to have their child support payments lowered. He also states that unemployment is the primary cause of child support arrears, and further state that these arrearages make the father subject to arrest and imprisonment without due process.<ref name = "Is there really a fatherhood crisis?">{{cite web | last = Baskerville | first = S | authorlink = | title = Is There Really A Fatherhood Crisis? | publisher = The Independent Institute | year = 2004 | url = http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=13&articleID=35 | accessdate = 2007-05-01 }}</ref>


Stephen Baskerville states that the purpose of child support should be publicly determined, and enforcement programs must be designed to serve that purpose, observing the due process of law.<ref name = Baskerville2007298/> Stephen Baskerville states that the purpose of child support should be publicly determined, and enforcement programs must be designed to serve that purpose, observing the due process of law.<ref name = Baskerville2007298/>

Revision as of 00:02, 15 July 2009

Rights
Theoretical distinctions
Human rights
Rights by beneficiary
Other groups of rights

The fathers' rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support that affect fathers and their children. Many of its members are fathers who desire to share the parenting of their children equally with their children's mother - either after divorce or as unwed fathers. The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with family law.

Most of the members of the fathers' rights movement had little prior interest in the law or politics. However, as they felt that their goal of equal shared parenting was being frustrated by the family courts, many took an interest in family law, including child custody and child support.

Though it has been described as a social movement, members of the movement believe their actions are better described as part of a civil rights movement. Objections to the characterizations of the movement as a social movement are related to the belief that discrimination against fathers moves beyond the social sciences and originates in government intervention into family life.

The movement has received international press coverage as a result of high profile activism of their members, has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful presence in family law debates.

Demographics

The fathers' rights movement exists almost exclusively in industrialized countries, where divorce has become more common. It emerged in the West from the 1960s onwards as part of the Men's movement with organizations such as Families Need Fathers originating in the 1970s. In the late twentieth-century, the growth of the internet permitted wider discussion, publicity and activism about issues of interest to fathers' rights activists. Factors thought to contribute to the development of the fathers' rights movement include shifting household demographics brought about by rising divorce and falling marriage rates, changes in the understanding and expectations of fatherhood, motherhood and childhood and shifts in how legal systems impact families.

Fathers' rights groups in the West are primarily composed of white, middle or working class, heterosexual men. Members tend to be politically conservative but do not share a single set of political or social views and are highly diverse in their goals and methods. They share a powerful desire to be allowed to have strong relationships with their children, and a focus on a narrowly defined set of issues based on the concerns of divorced or divorcing men. Women, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with family law, compose about 15 per cent of the movement.

The fathers' rights movement can be viewed has having both liberal and conservative branches, with different viewpoints about how men and women compare. Though both groups agree on the victimization and discrimination against men, they disagree on why men and women differ (nature versus nurture) and traditional gender roles. The liberal version believes differences between the sexes are due to culture, and support equality between men and women; in contrast the conservative branch believes in traditional patriarchal families and that the differences between genders are due to biology. Ross Parke and Armin Brott view the fathers' rights movement as one of three strands within the men's movement that deal almost exclusively with fatherhood, the other two being the good fathers' movement and groups forming the Christian Men's movement - the Promise Keepers being the largest.

The movement has been described by some as part of a gender war in response to increasing female power in Western society, and the consequent challenge to men's traditional roles and authority. Warren Farrell, a veteran of the women's, men’s and fathers’ movement since the 1970s, describes the fathers’ rights movement as part of a larger "gender transition movement." Farrell posits that fathers are now making a transition from gender-based roles to more flexible roles, and he compares this transition to the transition made by women since the 1960s. He feels the movement is also a civil rights movement for children, because in his view, the children of divorce raised equally by dads do better psychologically, socially, academically, and physically. Since children cannot fight for their rights, he argues that they need legal representation by fathers.

Some fathers’ rights groups have been short-lived and unstable, as members and leaders do not remain with the group after they have been helped. In 2005, disputes within Fathers 4 Justice occurred, with two of the best-known figures accused of defrauding an individual out of ₤500, while the accused men claimed they were ejected for questioning the organization's finances.

Beliefs and activities

Members of the fathers' rights movement assert that fathers are discriminated against as a result of gender bias in family law, that custody decisions have been a denial of equal rights, and that the influence of money has corrupted family law. The movement's primary focus has been to campaign (including lobbying and research) for formal legal rights for fathers, and sometimes for children, and to campaign for changes to family law related to child custody, support and maintenance, domestic violence and the family court system itself. Fathers’ rights groups also provide emotional and practical support for members during separation and divorce.

Some fathers' rights groups have become frustrated with the slow pace of traditional campaigning for law reform. Groups such as Fathers 4 Justice have become increasingly vocal and visible, undertaking public demonstrations which have attracted public attention and influenced the politics of family justice. Some protests have proved controversial and have led to public disorder convictions for participants.

The activities of some Fathers' rights groups have led to allegations of harassment and threatening behavior, and in a conviction for stalking. Fathers' rights activists have condemned violent behaviour, with Matt O'Connor of Fathers 4 Justice asserting that his organisation was committed to "peaceful, non-violent direct action" and that members caught engaging in intimidation would be expelled.

Sociologists Scott Coltrane and Neal Hickman state that like other political advocacy groups, members of fathers' rights groups cast their personal troubles as pressing social problems, and that they use rhetorical strategies to elicit emotional responses. Michael Flood states that its members support shared parenting only as a symbolic issue related to "rights", "equality", and "fairness." He also states that its members are not actually interested in the shared care of their children or on the wishes of their children, and he adds that fathers’ rights groups have advocated policies and strategies which are harmful to mothers and children and also harmful to the fathers themselves. In contrast, social scientist Sanford Braver states that the bad divorced dad image is a seriously inaccurate myth that has led to harmful and dangerous social policies.

Main issues

Family court system

Main article: Family law

Members of the fathers' rights movement criticize the family court system. They define court-determined custody as not a right to parent one's children but as the power to prevent the other partner from parenting, and they state that family courts are biased against fathers and shared custody. They state that the outcome of divorce is overly one-sided, divorce is initiated by mothers in more than two-thirds of cases - especially when children are involved, and that divorce provides advantages for women, such as automatic custody of the children and financial benefits in the form of child support payments. They also state that family courts are slow to help fathers enforce their parental rights, expensive and time-consuming.

Members of the fathers' rights movement including Stephen Baskerville, a former president of the American Coalition of Fathers and Children, state that family courts are secretive, censoring and punitive of fathers who criticize them, and they also state that employees and activists within the courts support and benefit from the separation of children from their parents. Baskerville further states that family law today represents civil rights abuses and intrusive perversion of government power.

Others contest these conclusions, state that family courts are biased in favor of fathers and also state that the lower percentage of separated fathers as custodial parents is a result of choices made by fathers rather than bias of family courts.

Shared parenting

Main articles: Child custody, shared parenting, and best interests

Stating that "children need two parents" and that "children have a fundamental human right to an opportunity and relationship with both their mother and father", members of the fathers’ rights movement call for greater equality in parental responsibility following separation and divorce. They call for laws creating a rebuttable presumption of 50/50 shared custody after divorce or separation, so that children would spend equal time with each parent unless there were reasons against it. They point to studies showing that children in shared custody settings are better adjusted and have fewer social problems such as low academic achievement, crime, pregnancy, substance abuse, depression and suicide, and state that shared parenting is in fact in the best interests of the child. They state that if equally shared parenting is not able to be agreed upon, children on average do better with their fathers on most of the significant areas of measurement: psychological, social, academic, and physical health and that higher levels of empathy and assertiveness, and lower levels of ADHD are found among children raised by fathers.

Members of the fathers' rights movement and their critics disagree about the correlation of negative developmental outcomes for children to sole custody situations. Critics of the fathers' rights movement and researcher V. C. McLoyd state that father absence covaries with other relevant family characteristics such as the lack of an income from a male adult, the absence of a second adult, and the lack of support from a second extended family system and conclude that it is the negative effects of poverty, and not the absence of a father, that result in negative developmental outcomes. On the other hand, members of the fathers' rights movement state that although the consequences of poverty and having a single parent are interrelated, each is a risk factor with independent effects on children, and that the negative outcomes for children in sole custody situations correlate more strongly to "fatherlessness" than to any other variable including poverty.

Members of the fathers' rights movement criticize the best interests of the child standard currently used in many countries for making custody decisions, which they describe as highly subjective and based on the personal prejudices of family court judges and court-appointed child custody evaluators, and that courts are abusive when more than half custody is taken away from a willing, competent parent. Members of the fathers' rights movement including Ned Holstein state that a rebuttable presumption of shared parenting is supported by a majority of citizens, and Baskerville states that proposals to enact such laws are opposed by divorce lawyers and by feminist organizations, the latter by invoking the specter of domestic violence and child abuse as propaganda directed against fathers and fathers' rights groups.

Critics of shared parenting state that joint custody arrangements are good for children only if there is no conflict between the parents. They state that if shared parenting were ordered, fathers would not provide their share of the daily care for the children. Critics also question the motives of those promoting shared parenting, noting that it would result in substantial decreases in or termination of child support payments.

Stephen Baskerville states that shared parenting has been demonstrated to reduce parental conflict by requiring parents to cooperate and compromise, and that it is the lack of constraint by one parent resulting from the ability of that parent to exclude the other, that results in increased parental conflict. He adds that only when child support guidelines exceed true costs do parents ask for or seek to prevent changes in parenting time for financial reasons, adding that any argument that a parent is asking for increased parenting time to reduce child support is at the same time an argument that the other parent is making a profit from child support.

Critics state that some fathers' rights groups are more interested in enabling men to re-establish authority over their children and ex-partners and that issues of power and control in cases of domestic violence and child abuse are ignored. Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that fathers have a constitutional right to shared control of their children and through political action they intend to establish parental authority for the well-being of their children. They also state that a rebuttable presumption for shared parenting preserves a child's protection against unfit or violent parents.

Child support

See also: Child support and paternity fraud

Members of the fathers’ rights movement campaign for the reform of child support guidelines, which in most Western countries are based on maintaining the children's standard of living after separation, and on the assumption that the children live with one parent and never with the other. Activists state that the current guidelines are arbitrary, provide mothers with financial incentives to divorce, and leave fathers with little discretionary income to enjoy with the children during their parenting time. In the US, fathers’ rights activists propose guidelines based on a Cost Shares model, in which child support would be based on the average income of the parents and the estimated child costs incurred by both parents. Laura W. Morgan has stated that it focuses on the relative living standards of divorcing parents rather than the best interests of the children and financially supporting them at the same level after divorce.

Solangel Maldonado states that the law should value a broader definition of fathering for poor fathers by reducing the focus on collecting child support and encouraging the informal contributions (such as groceries, clothes, toys, time with the children) of these fathers, by counting these contributions as child support.

Members of the fathers’ rights movement state that child support should be terminated under certain conditions, such as if the custodial parent limits access to the children by moving away against the wishes of the other parent, gives fraudulent testimony, or if paternity fraud is discovered, adding that two men should not have to pay child support for the same child.

Stephen Baskerville states that it is often difficult for fathers in financial hardship or who take on a larger caregiving role with their children to have their child support payments lowered. He also states that unemployment is the primary cause of child support arrears, and further state that these arrearages make the father subject to arrest and imprisonment without due process.

Stephen Baskerville states that the purpose of child support should be publicly determined, and enforcement programs must be designed to serve that purpose, observing the due process of law.

Domestic violence

Main articles: Domestic violence and child abuse

Supporters of the fathers' rights movement assert that some women make false claims of domestic violence, sexual or child abuse in order to gain an upper hand in divorce, custody disputes and/or prevent fathers from seeing their children, and they state that lawyers advise women to make such claims. They state that false claims of domestic violence and child abuse are encouraged by the inflammatory "win or lose" nature of child custody hearings, that men are presumed to be guilty rather than innocent by police and by the courts, and that false allegations hurt the real victims of domestic violence. They oppose the use of certain definitions of violence in child custody hearings that are based on fear, harassment and/or stalking, viewing them as vaguely defined and difficult to refute. Lawyers and advocates for abused women assert that family court proceedings are not uncommonly accompanied with allegations of domestic violence because of the prevalence of domestic violence in society rather than as a result of false allegations of domestic violence. They also assert that domestic violence often begins or increases around the time of divorce or separation.

Stephen Baskerville states that the paternal risk of child abuse is minimal. He adds that when child abuse occurs, the perpetrator is not likely to be the father, and that the child abuse most often occurs after the father has been separated from his children. He states that government policies are creating child abuse by separating children from their fathers.

Supporters of the fathers’ rights movement point to domestic violence studies based on the Conflict Tactics Scale, which suggest that men and women act violently toward their partners in about equal percentages. Members of the fathers' rights movement including Michael McCormick and Glenn Sacks state that men comprise a "significant minority" of the victims of domestic violence, and other supporters call for more services to be provided for male victims of domestic violence. Critics of the CTS dispute its reliability. Michael Flood states that the CTS definitions of domestic violence obscure "variations in the meaning, consequences, and context of violent behaviors in families and relationships."

Stephen Baskerville proposes that domestic violence and child abuse must be adjudicated as criminal assault, observing due process protections, and that government funding for programs addressing these issues must be made contingent on such protections.

Parenting time interference

Glenn Sacks states that some mothers interfere with the father's parenting time and that such interference should be stopped. Sackas and Jeffrey Leving state that parenting time interference can result from the custodial parent's relocation beyond a practical distance from the noncustodial parent and they campaign for a rebuttable presumption prohibiting such relocations.

Members of the fathers' rights movement also state that parental alienation is a well-documented phenomenon and that parental alienation syndrome is a valid syndrome, though parental alienation syndrome is not actually well supported by scientific research and has minimal acceptance in the mental health and legal scholarly communities, and it is not considered a syndrome by any appropriate governing body including the American Psychological Association or the American Psychiatric Association. It has also been described as a legal strategy, and one that has been rejected by some members of the legal community, including the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. Critics and members of the fathers' rights movement agree about the danger that claims of parental alienation syndrome may be used by abusive fathers as a weapon against appropriately protective mothers in order to win custody.

No-fault divorce

Main article: No-fault divorce

Stephen Baskerville states that laws establishing no-fault divorce did not stop at removing the requirement that grounds be cited for a divorce, so as to allow for divorce by "mutual consent"; it also allows either spouse to end the marriage without any agreement or fault by the other. Phyllis Schlafly states that no-fault divorce should be referred to as unilateral divorce.

Stephen Baskerville states that laws establishing no-fault divorce can be seen as one of the boldest social experiments in modern history that have effectively ended marriage as a legal contract. He states that it is not possible to form a binding agreement to create a family, adding that government officials can, at the request of one spouse, end a marriage over the objection of the other. He states that no-fault divorce has left fathers with no protection against what they describe as the confiscation of their children.

Baskerville states that fault has entered through the back door in the form of child custody hearings, and that the forcibly divorced spouse ("defendant") is presumed guilty. Similarly, some other members of the fathers' rights movement believe that men fail to get appropriate recognition of their innocence as a result of no-fault divorce. Baskerville describes a proposed amendment of no-fault divorce laws that would create a rebuttable presumption that custody of any minor children be awarded to the respondent regardless of gender. He also notes the predictions of Tim O'Brien, the author of the proposed amendment and a Libertarian, who states that the proposed amendment would result in a plummeting divorce rate and reduced negative consequences for children.

Stephen Baskerville proposes "reasonable limits" on no-fault divorce when children are involved. Some members of the FRM support the end of the no-fault principle in child custody and divorce decisions. Some members of the fathers' rights movement state that the availability of divorce should also be limited.

Government involvement

Stephen Baskerville states that governments throughout the United States and other democracies are engaged, by accident or design, in a campaign against fathers and fatherhood, which in his view, lies at the root of a larger problem that threatens marriage, destroys families, devastates the lives of many children, and undermines parents, democracy and accountability. Baskerville also states that it is the removal of the father from the family through divorce that initiates problems for which the government is perceived as the solution rather than the problem, and that these problems are then used to justify the continued existence and expansion of the government. Members of the fathers' rights movement state that modern divorce involves government officials invading parents' private lives, evicting people from their homes, seizing their property, and taking away their children.

Unwarranted termination of parental rights

Main article: Parents' rights movement

Parents' rights advocates state that many parents' parental rights are unnecessarily terminated, and that children are separated from fathers and mothers and adopted through the actions of family courts and government social service agencies seeking to meet their own targets, rather than looking at the merits of each case.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that government employees harm children by disregarding the loving bonds they share with their fathers, when social workers place children in the foster care system without informing their fathers.

Terminology

Fathers' and parents' rights campaigners state that parenting time should be used to replace contact, visitation and residence. The term visitation is particularly objectionable to fathers' rights activists, who believe that this term reinforces the idea that only one parent raises the children. It is perceived that there is a stigma associated with treating one parent as resident and the other as non-resident.

Members of the fathers' rights movement state that child support should be referred to as parental transfer payments.

Notable supporters

Public supporters of the fathers' rights movement and their issues, include divorced (and subsequently widowed) Live Aid founder, Bob Geldof, Irish writer and journalist John Waters and Karen DeCrow, former president of the National Organization for Women.

Significant writers

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ Collier & Sheldon, 2006, p. 1-26.
  2. ^ Collier, R (2006-11-01). "Unfamiliar territory: The issue of a father's rights and responsibilities covers more than just the media-highlighted subject of access to his children". The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-10-17. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) Cite error: The named reference "collier" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ Kaye, M (1998). "Fathers' Rights Groups in Australia and their Engagement with Issues in Family Law" (DOC). Australian Journal of Family Law. 12: 19–68. Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Crowley, JE (2008). Defiant Dads: Fathers' Rights Activists in America. Cornell University Press. pp. 43–46. ISBN 978-0801446900. Cite error: The named reference "crowley" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ Sacks, G (2006-06-21). "Why Are There so Many Women in the Fathers' Movement?". Star Tribune. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. McKee, A (2005). The Public Sphere: an introduction. University of Queensland. pp. 47. ISBN 9780521549905.
  7. Kenedy, R (2004). Fathers For Justice: The Rise Of A New Social Movement In Canada As A Case Study Of Collective Identity Formation. Caravan Books. ISBN 978-0882061085.
  8. Baskerville, 2007, p. 259.
  9. Baskerville, 2007, p. 282.
  10. ^ Farrell, Warren (2001). Father and Child Reunion. Putnam. pp. Chap. 1–2. ISBN 978-1585420759.
  11. ^ Gavanas, A (2004). Kimmel MS; Aronson A (ed.). Men and Masculinities. ABC-CLIO. pp. 289–91. ISBN 1576077748.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  12. ^ Collier & Sheldon, 2006 p. 53-78
  13. Lee, CN (2003). "Fathers' rights". In Carroll BE (ed.). American Masculinities : A Historical Encyclopedia. SAGE Publications. pp. 166–68. ISBN 9780761925408.
  14. Ganong, L (1999). Changing Families, Changing Responsibilities: Family Obligations Following Divorce and Remarriage. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 48. ISBN 0805826912. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  15. Crowley, JE (2006). "Organization Responses to the Fatherhood Crisis: the Case of Fathers' Rights Group". In Haas L; Wisensale SL (ed.). Families and social policy: national and international perspectives. Haworth Press. pp. 107-8. ISBN 9780789032409.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  16. Messner, MA (1997). Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 47. ISBN 9780803955776.
  17. ^ Bertoia, C (1993). "The Fathers' Rights Movement: Contradictions in Rhetoric and Practice". Journal of Family Issues. 14: 592–615. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ Parke, 1999, p. 142; 148-55.
  19. Parke & Brott, 1999 p. 148
  20. Williams, GI (2002). "Fathers' Rights Movement". Historical and Multicultural Encyclopedia of Women's Reproductive Rights in the United States. Greenwood Press. pp. 81–83. ISBN 978-0313306440.
  21. ^ Gavanas, A (2004). Fatherhood Politics in the United States. University of Illinois Press. pp. 10-11. ISBN 9780252028847.
  22. ^ Flood, M (2004). "Angry Men's Movements". In Rossi SE (ed.). The Battle and Backlash Rage On. Xlibris Corporation. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  23. ^ Williams, GI (2003). "Framing in the Fathers' Rights Movement". In Loseke DR & Best J (ed.). Social Problems: Constructionist Readings. Aldine Transaction. pp. 93–100. ISBN 9780202307039. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  24. Doyle, C (2004). "The Fathers Rights Movement: Extending patriarchal control beyond the marital family". In Herrmann P (ed.). Citizenship Revisited: Threats or Opportunities of Shifting Boundaries. Nova Science Pub Inc. pp. 57–88. ISBN 978-1590339008.
  25. Coates, S (2005-06-08). "Fathers 4 Justice split by infighting". Times Online. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
  26. Ashe, F (2007). The New Politics of Masculinity. Routledge. pp. 58–68. ISBN 978-0-415-30275-3.
  27. Baskerville, 2007, p. 42.
  28. Sheaves, B (2004-11-25). "Fathers 4 Terror". Daily Mail. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  29. "Fathers 4 Justice four are guilty". BBC News. 2004-10-21. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  30. Bolton, MM (2006-04-21). "Custody bill fight turns frightful". Times-Union. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  31. ^ Elliott, J (2004-11-21). "Fathers 'terrorise' lawyers: Campaigners accused of threats". The Sunday Times. Retrieved 2008-11-04. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  32. "Blackshirts want Family Court axed". Australian Associated Press. 14 December 2004. Retrieved 2008-11-05.
  33. Cauldfield, Christine (2004-09-30). "Stalker: lesson learned". Herald-Sun. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  34. Gilchrist, Jim (2003-05-29). "The outlaw fathers fighting back". The Scotsman. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  35. ^ Coltrane, S; Hickman, N (1992). "The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws". Social Problems. 19 (4): 400–420. doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.4.03x0046t.
  36. Smyth, Bruce. "Child support Policy in Australia: Back to basics?" (PDF). Family Matters (67). Australian Institute of Family Studies. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
  37. Flood, M. "Separated Fathers and the Fathers' Rights Movement" (DOC). Feminism, Law and the Family Workshop. Law School, University of Melbourne. Retrieved 2007-03-12. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  38. Baskerville, 2007, p. 17.
  39. ^ Baskerville, 2007.
  40. "Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Fourth Report". House of Commons, Parliament UK. 2005-02-23. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  41. ^ Charalambous, M (2005-07-10). "New research shows bias in restraining orders". The Fatherhood Coalition. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
  42. "The Operation of the Family Courts" (pdf). House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee Family Justice. 2004-11-08. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  43. ^ Baskerville, S (2003). "Divorce as Revolution". Salisbury Review. 21 (4). Retrieved 2008-11-10.
  44. Sacks, G (2004-05-25). "National Fatherhood Initiative's Ad Campaign Insults African-American Fathers". Daily Breeze. Retrieved 2007-03-14. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  45. Baskerville, S (2004). The Fatherhood Crisis: Time for a New Look (PDF). National Center for Policy Analysis. ISBN 1-56808-136-7. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  46. ^ Baskerville, S (2002). "The Politics of Fatherhood". Political Science and Politics. 35 (4). Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  47. ^ Baskerville, S (2006). "Family Violence in America The Truth About Domestic Violence and Child Abuse" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-03-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  48. Baskerville, 2007, p. 24.
  49. ^ Baker, Maureen (2001). Families, labour and love: . Vancouver: UBC Press. pp. 198–9. ISBN 0-7748-0848-9.
  50. Parkin, K (1974-06-12). "Fathers need their families". The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  51. "Shared Parenting Council". Shared Parenting Council. Retrieved 2008-11-04.
  52. ^ Ottaman, Ana (2008). "Fathers' rights movement". In Edleson, Jeffrey L., Renzetti, Claire M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Violence. SAGE Publications. pp. 252. ISBN 978-1412918008. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  53. "Shared Parenting: Common Objections versus the Facts" (PDF). The Liberator. 32 (3). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. 2005. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  54. McCormick M. "HB 5267 Will Help Michigan's Children of Divorce". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  55. ^ "New York Times Press Gives Major Press Coverage for Fathers". Fathers & Families. 2005-05-08. Retrieved 2007-05-27.
  56. ^ Schlafly, P (2007-07-23). "Children's rights should include life with both parents". Retrieved 2007-09-30.
  57. McLoyd VC (1998). "Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development". Am Psychol. 53 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185. PMID 9491747. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  58. Hart, CH (1999). "Combating the Myth that Parents Don't Matter". The Howard Center for Family Religion and Society. Retrieved 2007-03-28.
  59. "Deconstructing the Essential Father". SPARC. Retrieved 2007-09-22.
  60. ^ Baskerville, S (2004). "Is There Really A Fatherhood Crisis?". The Independent Institute. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  61. ^ Schlafly, P (2005-02-02). "The Fatherphobia of Family Courts". Retrieved 2007-04-24.
  62. Newdow, M (2004-06-18). "Family Feud". Slate. Retrieved 2007-04-30.
  63. "An Appeal to the Parents of America about the Destruction of the American Family" (pdf). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
  64. "Testimony in Support of an Act Relative to Shared Parenting" (PDF). Fathers & Families. 2003-09-25. Retrieved 2007-10-14.
  65. Baskerville, 2007, p.21.
  66. Yee, MY (2002). "A Model of Children's Postdivorce Behavioral Adjustment in Maternal- and Dual-Residence Arrangements". Journal of Family Issues. 23 (5): 672–697. doi:10.1177/0192513X02023005005.; lay-summary
  67. American Bar Association (2000), Guide to Family Law: Effect of Joint Custody, retrieved 2007-03-15
  68. "Fathers' Responsibilities Before Fathers' Rights". NOW-NYS. 2006-07-29. Retrieved 2007-09-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  69. Baskerville, 2007, p. 305.
  70. Baskerville, 2007, p. 249.
  71. Michigan National Organization for Women (1996), Mandated Joint Physical And Legal Custody Bill (– ), retrieved 2007-03-24 {{citation}}: External link in |format= (help)
  72. Callander, Debbi. "On Abuse, Shared Parenting, & the System". Retrieved 2007-03-24. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  73. "Fathers' Rights Are Fathers' Duties". FatherMag.Com. 1998–2000. Retrieved 2007-10-14.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  74. "Position Paper of Fathers & Families" (PDF). Fathers & Families. 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-06.
  75. ^ "Comments on the Child Support Guidelines". F.A.C.T. Fathers Are Capable Too: Parenting Association. Retrieved 2007-04-12.
  76. ^ "Recommendations for Child Support Guideline Revisement June, 2001". 2001. Retrieved 2007-04-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  77. Wilson, KC (2004-09-15). "The Subversion of Child Support". IFeminists.Com. Retrieved 2007-03-17.
  78. Morgan, LW (2005-02-15). "The "Cost Share" model of child support guidelines". Retrieved 2007-03-24.
  79. Maldonado, S (2006). "Deadbeat or Deadbroke: Redefining Child Support for Poor Fathers" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-06-21.
  80. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 298.
  81. ^ "Controlling Domestic Violence Against Men". Equal Justice Foundation. 2002. Retrieved 2007-10-04. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  82. ^ "An Epidemic of Civil Rights Abuses: Ranking of States' Domestic Violence Laws" (PDF). Respecting accuracy in domestic abuse reporting. 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  83. "Claims about Husband Battering". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. August 1999. Retrieved 2007-09-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  84. ^ "October's Domestic Violence Awareness Month Ignores Many Victims". American Coalition of Fathers and Children. 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  85. "Equal Rights Amendment Yes, 'Women's Equality Amendment' No". GlennSacks.Com. 2006. Retrieved 2007-04-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  86. Taft, A (2001). "Are men and women equally violent to intimate partners?". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 25 (6): 498–500. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  87. ^ Flood, Michael (2006-02-23/24). The Debate Over Men’s Versus Women’s Family Violence. Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Family Violence Conference. Adelaide. {{cite conference}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  88. Archer, J (1999). "Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scale: A meta-analytic review". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 14 (12): 1263–1289.
  89. "Equal Parents Week Highlights Need for Family Court Reform". GlennSacks.Com. 2002-09-26. Retrieved 2007-03-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  90. "AB 400 Will Help Wisconsin's Children of Divorce". glennsacks.com. 2005-06-17. Retrieved 2007-05-12. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthers= ignored (help)
  91. Bow, JN (2009). "Examining Parental Alienation in Child Custody Cases: A Survey of Mental Health and Legal Professionals". The American Journal of Family Therapy. 37 (2): 127–145. doi:10.1080/01926180801960658. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  92. "Statement on Parental Alienation Syndrome". American Psychological Association. 2005-10-28. Retrieved 2007-03-11.
  93. Hoult, JA (2006). "The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy". Children's Legal Rights Journal. 26 (1).
  94. ^ "Child Abuse Experts Applaud Legal Community for Rejecting Parental Alienation Syndrome" (Press release). The Leadership Council on Child Abuse and Interpersonal Violence. 2006-07-12. Retrieved 2007-03-12.
  95. "Protect Children from Alienation". Ifeminists.Com. 2006-07-12. Retrieved 2007-10-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  96. Baskerville, 2007, p. 45.
  97. ^ Schlafly, P (2006). "Phyllis Schlafly's keynote address" (wmv). American Coalition of Fathers and Children. Retrieved 2007-05-12.
  98. ^ Baskerville, 2007, p. 46.
  99. Baskerville, 2007, p.44.
  100. Baskerville, 2007, p. 76-77.
  101. Baskerville, 2007, p. 306.
  102. Khader, Serene J. (October–December 2008). "When Equality Justifies Women's Subjection: Luce Irigaray's Critique of Equality and the Fathers' Rights Movement". Hypatia:A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. 23 (4). Indiana University Press: pp. 48–74. doi:10.2979/HYP.2008.23.4.48. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  103. "Restoring Control over matrimonial and family law". September 2004. Retrieved 2008-12-07. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  104. Baskerville, 2007, pp. 18, 268, 287.
  105. Baskerville, 2007, p. 287.
  106. Baskerville, 2007, p. 20.
  107. Gavanas, A (2002). "The Fatherhood Responsibility Movement: the centrality of marriage, work and male sexuality in reconstructions of masculinity and fatherhood". In Hobson B (ed.). Making Men Into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood. Cambridge University Press. pp. 220. ISBN 0511029527.
  108. "Unwarranted Adoptions". BBC. Retrieved 2007-06-05.
  109. Leving, JM (2007-07-11). "Choosing foster parents over fathers". The San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved 2007-10-05. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  110. "Bob Geldof". Shared Parenting Information Group (SPIG) UK. Retrieved 2007-05-01.
  111. "Welcome to California Shared Parenting Alliance". California Shared Parenting Alliance. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  112. Fittro, T. "Family law reform helps children". Sunday Gazette Mail. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

References

External links

Family rights
Elements
Rights movements
See also
Related
Categories: