Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
In addition, please do not use "vandalism" to refer to edits with which you disagree on content grounds ] (]) 08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)</div>
In addition, please do not use "vandalism" to refer to edits with which you disagree on content grounds ] (]) 08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)</div>
{{unblock|I fully undertand why I got blocked and I admit that I have lost my temper at that specific article. However, the reverts were mainly motivated by edits that contradict cited sources. I have discussed the topic on the talk page and will soon seek a dispute resolution as the frequent edits damage the article imo. I honestly did not know that 3 reverts result in a block, will be more careful next time. }}
{{tlx|unblock|I fully undertand why I got blocked and I admit that I have lost my temper at that specific article. However, the reverts were mainly motivated by edits that contradict cited sources. I have discussed the topic on the talk page and will soon seek a dispute resolution as the frequent edits damage the article imo. I honestly did not know that 3 reverts result in a block, will be more careful next time. }}
'''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s):
<br><br>Sounds like exactly what we want. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
''Request handled by:'' ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 23:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
<small> '''Unblocking administrator''': Please check for <span class="plainlinks"> on this user after accepting the unblock request.</small>
<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->
|}
Revision as of 23:46, 16 July 2009
hello
July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Banská Bystrica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. lifebaka++22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|I fully undertand why I got blocked and I admit that I have lost my temper at that specific article. However, the reverts were mainly motivated by edits that contradict cited sources. I have discussed the topic on the talk page and will soon seek a dispute resolution as the frequent edits damage the article imo. I honestly did not know that 3 reverts result in a block, will be more careful next time.}}
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Banská Bystrica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. lifebaka++ 22:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
