Misplaced Pages

User talk:Off2riorob: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:38, 17 July 2009 view sourceLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 edits Personal attacks: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 10:38, 17 July 2009 view source ClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,172 editsm Archiving 4 discussions to User talk:Off2riorob/Archives/2009/July. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
}} }}
<!-- VERY IMPORTANT! READ THIS! DO NOT POST YOUR MESSAGE ABOVE THIS LINE. POST YOUR NEW MESSAGE ONLY AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE, OR USE THE "NEW SECTION" TAB AT THE TOP OF THIS WEB PAGE. CLICK ON THE "NEW SECTION" TAB NOW! :) Please post all messages AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE thanks --> <!-- VERY IMPORTANT! READ THIS! DO NOT POST YOUR MESSAGE ABOVE THIS LINE. POST YOUR NEW MESSAGE ONLY AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE, OR USE THE "NEW SECTION" TAB AT THE TOP OF THIS WEB PAGE. CLICK ON THE "NEW SECTION" TAB NOW! :) Please post all messages AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE thanks -->

== RfA links ==

Here are the links you requested for "discretionary" RfA closures. I misread one of them the first time; there are only 6 succesful rather than 7.

'''Successful''':
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

'''Not Successful''':
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

Hope that helps, although you may be disappointed to find most don't have very comprehensive closing comments. ]<b><font color="#6060BF">]</font></b> 17:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

== Edit Summary ==

Damn, I didn't think you'd pull something like that. "removed conspiracy theory" doesn't quite summarise tearing out an entire section now does it? I understand if some of it is a bit conspiracy-ish, but it deserves mention in some form. Maybe not as long winded, maybe remove some speculation, etc - deleting it completely without discussion? Not cool.

Remind me to never let you clean my house - a little bit of dirt, I know ; lets use a flame thrower - I'd have no furniture left!

] (]) 22:35, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

It is a conspiracy theory, I am working on it for the GA. Flame thrower at the ready.. I am leaving most of the negative stuff in. (] (]) 22:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC))

== Re: Good article. ==

Oops, got side-tracked off-wiki. I'm back now, and ready and willing to get to work. Let me know what needs done, and what you're working on, etc. Cheers, ]<sup>]</sup> 09:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

== Gordon Brown ==

You still have to fix the location of the refs, the last alt text, and the renewed disamb problems.--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 23:30, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
*All citations should immediately follow a punctuation mark with no intervening spaces. Do a find for ". ] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 23:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


== Personal attacks == == Personal attacks ==

Revision as of 10:38, 17 July 2009

Duck Test

Well, it could be a rabbit in disguise!
Hungry?... Have a pizza!

Archives


No archives yet.

Personal attacks

I sympathize with your frustration, but I don't think resorting to personal attacks () is going to help you in a case pursuing personal attacks. =\ – Luna Santin (talk) 10:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)