| Revision as of 15:21, 19 May 2002 edit162.83.233.85 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:55, 7 June 2002 edit undo195.149.37.38 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | <b>Maoism</b> is a ] doctrine attributed to ]. Post-Mao, the doctrine has been identified with ] of the Cambodian ], the ] of Peru, and various extreme communist groups in the developed world. | ||
| ⚫ | Post-Mao, the doctrine has been identified with ] of the Cambodian ], the ] of Peru, and various extreme communist groups in the developed world. | ||
| Ironically, despite being listed as one of the ], the government of the People's Republic of China has discarded | Ironically, despite being listed as one of the ], the government of the People's Republic of China has discarded | ||
| Line 10: | Line 7: | ||
| Some, including many in the ] and ] activists see many of the repressive aspects of the current PRC government as the result of Maoism. | Some, including many in the ] and ] activists see many of the repressive aspects of the current PRC government as the result of Maoism. | ||
| Some Western scholars argue that China's rapid industrialization and relatively quick recovery from the brutal period of civil wars 1911-1949 was a positive impact of Maoism, and contrast its development specifically to that of ], ] and ]. One argument is that Mao's strong personality and doctrine served the same purpose as American executive and military leadership, and the ], in Europe - an extremely simple theory of the origin of modern ]: ], ], and ] itself. | Some Western scholars argue that China's rapid industrialization and relatively quick recovery from the brutal period of civil wars 1911-1949 was a positive impact of Maoism, and contrast its development specifically to that of ], ] and ]. One argument is that Mao's strong personality and doctrine served the same purpose as American executive and military leadership, and the ], in Europe - an extremely simple theory of the origin of modern ]: ], ], and ] itself. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 15: | ||
| it created revolutionary instablity which impeded economic growth. Liberal | it created revolutionary instablity which impeded economic growth. Liberal | ||
| scholars tend to fault Maoism for its dictatorial and anti-democratic nature. | scholars tend to fault Maoism for its dictatorial and anti-democratic nature. | ||
| See: ], ] | |||
Revision as of 15:55, 7 June 2002
Maoism is a communist doctrine attributed to Mao Zedong. Post-Mao, the doctrine has been identified with Pol Pot of the Cambodian Khmer Rouge, the Shining Path of Peru, and various extreme communist groups in the developed world.
Ironically, despite being listed as one of the four cardinal principles, the government of the People's Republic of China has discarded revolutionary Maoism as an official ideology. Along Mao Zedong himself is regarded in the official history as a great revolutionary leader for his role in fighting the Japanese and creating the People's Republic of China, Maoism as implemented after 1958 is regarded as an economic and political disaster. Specifically, within Chinese Marxist ideology, Maoism is regarded as committing the errors of left deviationism and being based on a cult of personality.
Some, including many in the Chinese democracy movement and human rights activists see many of the repressive aspects of the current PRC government as the result of Maoism.
Some Western scholars argue that China's rapid industrialization and relatively quick recovery from the brutal period of civil wars 1911-1949 was a positive impact of Maoism, and contrast its development specifically to that of Southeast Asia, Russia and India. One argument is that Mao's strong personality and doctrine served the same purpose as American executive and military leadership, and the Marshall Plan, in Europe - an extremely simple theory of the origin of modern continental trading blocs: NAFTA, EU, and China itself.
However, almost all Chinese scholars and most Western scholars disagree. Some conservative scholars, which include most who are sympathetic to the current Chinese government, argue that Maoism was a disaster because it created revolutionary instablity which impeded economic growth. Liberal scholars tend to fault Maoism for its dictatorial and anti-democratic nature.