Revision as of 21:46, 20 July 2009 editChildofMidnight (talk | contribs)43,041 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:53, 20 July 2009 edit undoLaw (talk | contribs)7,280 edits →Pink Dot: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 354: | Line 354: | ||
:: To repeat; I am not going to alter a close that I still believe to be correct (indeed, even more so than at the time, given what we now know about a number of participants in it) and so ] is your next port of call. Also, since you are unable to communicate civilly, this conversation is now at an end. <b>]</b> 21:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | :: To repeat; I am not going to alter a close that I still believe to be correct (indeed, even more so than at the time, given what we now know about a number of participants in it) and so ] is your next port of call. Also, since you are unable to communicate civilly, this conversation is now at an end. <b>]</b> 21:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Here's the discussion: . Your coatrack argument, aside from showing your personal bias, is irrelevant because that's an editing issue. The fact that the controversy is still in the news clearly shows it meets our notability guidelines. And there was no consensus to close as delete in the first place. Your "notnews" argument has also been disproved by it being an ongoing story that is continuing. Statements like "Very few of the Keep arguments hold any water" are highly uncivil and inappropriate. If you want to be treated with respect you should abide by our policies and show respect to good faith editors. ] (]) 21:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | :::Here's the discussion: . Your coatrack argument, aside from showing your personal bias, is irrelevant because that's an editing issue. The fact that the controversy is still in the news clearly shows it meets our notability guidelines. And there was no consensus to close as delete in the first place. Your "notnews" argument has also been disproved by it being an ongoing story that is continuing. Statements like "Very few of the Keep arguments hold any water" are highly uncivil and inappropriate. If you want to be treated with respect you should abide by our policies and show respect to good faith editors. ] (]) 21:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
It's too short. It needs 780 more characters. You want to help me expand it in the next hour? I have to head to school soon. ]<sub> ] ]</sub> 22:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:53, 20 July 2009
This user was a participant in the 2009 Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout, improving articles from July 18–22. |
"I would find it impossible to just sit back and watch the blatant injustice without doing something about it. I'd have reversed that block immediately and blocked the blocking admin for 24 hours, until he'd sobered up." -common sense (uncommon on Misplaced Pages)
Travesty in motion: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Obama articles/Proposed decision. Misplaced Pages's arbcom is in the process of dishing out heavy punishments to good faith editors who have faced the wall of incivility and NPOV violating POV pushers camped out on the Obama articles. Despite many efforts to discuss the issue and present alternatives for resolving it, Wizardman and the other Arbcoms appear ready to reinforce and encourage the incivility, obstruction, wikilawyering, and harassment carried out by those calling themselves "defenders" and "patrollers" on these pages. This is a dark time for Misplaced Pages when bias is encouraged and the censors are rewarded for their efforts. If you're opposed to Arbcom spitting on our core policy of NPOV please contact them and let them know that punishing the good faith efforts of editors facing severe challenges in addressing this problem is the height of bad form and totally unacceptable.
- Please leave your flattering comments and appreciation for my good work at the bottom of the page.
- To discuss issues on this page, please refer to the associated talk page.
- Read about the Kelapstick Bacon Challenge 2009 or get an early start on the 2010 Bacon Challenge coming up in December, 2009 as a giant Christmas present to all of Misplaced Pages that will be unwrapped March 1, 2010 for National Pig Day!
Archives | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
It was about time you had one of these
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
For special merits in Dragon breeding. |
Thanks
Thank you ever so much,have fun as well Secthayrabe (talk)
Putting this here for now since I can't edit my userpage at the moment. Maybe once Connolley sobers up?
user:ChildofMidnight/Wiel Arets translation
References
The Dutch don't need no stinking references!
The Surreal Barnstar
The Surreal Barnstar | ||
ChildofMidnight, you're hereby awarded the Surreal Barnstar for your delightful and innovative thinking when editing Iceland-South Korea relations. You have brought me really a big laughter with an amusement for your creativity. Even though that approach could be wrongly accused of a practice of original research by some, well, I appreciate your avant garde sprite to the community. Caspian blue 21:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC) |
Matt Sanchez
I suggest you tread lightly at this under-Arbcom-probation article and read through the talk page archives and discussing changes before making any changes to the article. The content which you removed has a consensus to be where it is. - ALLST✰R▼ wuz here 22:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Allstarecho has been one of the most biased of editors. It's truly appauling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.163.18.130 (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I wish
you would better redact the last comment regarding your hopeful ArbCom plan and capital punishment or the whole opinion? That sounds reckless in the situation because you can be viewed as "enjoy the whole situation".--Caspian blue 00:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Casp when did you become so serious? ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- How do you know whether capital punishment is an effective Arbcom remedy unless it's tried? It could go a long way in cutting down on drama. Although I suppose there is a counter argument that it would only increase the level of drama (at least for a short time...). ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Joking is not my specialty and I highly respect the admin.--Caspian blue 00:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think you should tell him that. My reference to capital punishment isn't in regard to him at all and has no conscious relation to the mentions of the "T&P crowd". It's only a statement on my approach to resolving disputes. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Did you notice someone said something about a "Herring Mop Kid"? Could that have something to do with South Korea-Iceland relations? ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I know what you meant by it.
- Of course, that name calling is associated with his peeking into your sincere devotion to pickling herring and cabbage.--Caspian blue 17:46, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Joking is not my specialty and I highly respect the admin.--Caspian blue 00:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
User rights
Per your question here. The answer is likely that you have not requested any additional rights. see: WP:PERM. However, in boldly reviewing your contributions, which exceed 20,000 - I believe that you can be trusted with a few additional tools that will improve your abilities to contribute to our project. I have added the following rights to your list:
1. Rollback. Please note that this should never be used in a content dispute, but only for blatant vandalism. Please read through: WP:ROLLBACK
2. Autoreview. As you have contributed to over 1,000 NPP efforts, and created 100 articles, I believe you would find this tool useful in relieving others of reviewing some of your work. (although I do realize that your edits are reviewed by a great number of people, and in great detail). Please read through Misplaced Pages:Autoreviewer
Best of luck, and feel free to ask if you have any questions. ;-) — Ched : ? 17:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- You are a madman. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- I believe that you just might be able to establish "consensus" for that. ;) — Ched : ? 17:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- OH NO WHAT HAVE YOU DONE??? AAAARGHHHH! ROLLBACK FOR THIS TROUBLEMAKER!!! That's it, I'm going over to Conservapedia. Drmies (talk) 02:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind that last remark--after looking at this I take it back. What a bunch of ... ha, words fail me. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Looks okay to me. :) Did you think his close connections to corrupt convicted felons and known terrorists should have been made more prominent? Or were you unhappy with the neglect that the record deficits, massive unemployment increases despite huge government spending and borrowing and tax increases received? My favorite Obama quote so far, in all seriousness, is when he says that the plan to have the government take over the health care system isn't socialism. Let me know if you want the exact quote. He's slick, I'll give him that. But hopefully it will all work out like it did in 1994 right? Good times after responsible parties took over the legislative branch. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm I kind of missed the part that suggested the US was a democracy, and the president was elected in a fairly democratic way, without resort to Supreme Courts and all that. A national health care system is not socialist, unfortunately. Didn't Thatcher's England have the NHS already? Would you say that the Iron Lady was a socialist for not demolishing the NHS? Thanks; I accept your apology. The clincher is that the president is a Muslim cause he doesn't go to church very often. I never expected such a level of idiocy and psychosis there, but I guess I just don't listen to the radio often enough. Well, good times they were, but my experiment there is over. I'm sticking with Seed Swaps and BLTs. Drmies (talk) 02:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, at an AfD the other day someone was making fun of me cause I was writing articles on the Claw Boys Claw (and you know you're guilty of that too, tweaking around and stuff) while they were curing cancer. So just to spite them I made Claw Boys Claw 3 in 1 and Crack My Nut. Ha, crack it if you can! So...I'll see you in Orange Beach, two weeks from now? Drmies (talk) 04:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's good you're going to be down there so you can check out some rentals for me. What kind of rates are there? I'd like to be able to walk to stuff and especially to be able to run from my apartment or house. A backyard would be excellent, but if it's on the beach that's okay too. Is there an airport type thing in Pensacola? How far is it from there? Is that the best place to fly into? How far are you from there? Maybe I'll stay with you for a few months just until I get a feel for the area. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, at an AfD the other day someone was making fun of me cause I was writing articles on the Claw Boys Claw (and you know you're guilty of that too, tweaking around and stuff) while they were curing cancer. So just to spite them I made Claw Boys Claw 3 in 1 and Crack My Nut. Ha, crack it if you can! So...I'll see you in Orange Beach, two weeks from now? Drmies (talk) 04:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm I kind of missed the part that suggested the US was a democracy, and the president was elected in a fairly democratic way, without resort to Supreme Courts and all that. A national health care system is not socialist, unfortunately. Didn't Thatcher's England have the NHS already? Would you say that the Iron Lady was a socialist for not demolishing the NHS? Thanks; I accept your apology. The clincher is that the president is a Muslim cause he doesn't go to church very often. I never expected such a level of idiocy and psychosis there, but I guess I just don't listen to the radio often enough. Well, good times they were, but my experiment there is over. I'm sticking with Seed Swaps and BLTs. Drmies (talk) 02:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Looks okay to me. :) Did you think his close connections to corrupt convicted felons and known terrorists should have been made more prominent? Or were you unhappy with the neglect that the record deficits, massive unemployment increases despite huge government spending and borrowing and tax increases received? My favorite Obama quote so far, in all seriousness, is when he says that the plan to have the government take over the health care system isn't socialism. Let me know if you want the exact quote. He's slick, I'll give him that. But hopefully it will all work out like it did in 1994 right? Good times after responsible parties took over the legislative branch. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
←Without getting too much into my own personal beliefs on political matters, I can appreciate CoMs view of the current presentation of American political viewpoints. I believe in a level playing field, and my perception is that there is often a "tilted" viewpoint in regards to many things here. I often cringe at some of the things that are said, and I truly wish that I could find a way to bring opposing sides to a mutual understanding and respect - even if they don't agree. I'm often in a difficult situation when 2 people that I admire and respect can not find a way to communicate.
CoM, I do honestly understand how strongly you feel, how offended you've felt, and how hurt you've been; but I really wish you would see that there are good and honest people on both sides of every issue. I watched, and even participated in (mildly), an effort to "reach across the isle" in a gesture of collaboration. I ask you now, PLEASE ... put down the tools of confrontation, and at least "look" at the tools of co-existence. We build the best bridges when we work together - please consider that. Your friend always, Ched. — Ched : ? 03:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ched if you don't have anything funny or sarcastic to add to the conversation I will have to remove your comments as trolling. This is a civility free zone. And seriously, I wouldn't take anything Drmies says seriously. The guy has issues. But I'm going to try to get him on a better track once I'm down there. He may just need some guidance and straight talk. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- See comment on Trinity below, just so you know what you're getting into. Drmies (talk) 14:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Electro-kinetic road ramp
Thanks for fixing Electro-kinetic road ramp. I thought I had used copy and paste to create the title, but I guess perhaps I hadn't. Thanks for helping out. Grundle2600 (talk) 07:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Electro-kinetic road ramp
Thanks for fixing Electro-kinetic road ramp. I thought I had used copy and paste to create the title, but I guess perhaps I hadn't. Thanks for helping out. Grundle2600 (talk) 07:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for the duplicate. It stalled the first time, and I thought it hadn't gone through. Grundle2600 (talk) 00:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- No worries Grundle. Thanks for creating another interesting article. I hope you're having a great summer. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've been having fun reading this article and others at this liberal parody of conservapedia. You have a fun summer too! Grundle2600 (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's good stuff. Very funny and well done. I hope Drmies sees it. I'm sure he will also enjoy it. I think the weirdest thing about the Conservapedia article is that it focuses so heavily on the conspiracies and trivialities instead of the big issues. Interesting. It's a crazy world. ;) ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I created my own account there. Grundle2600 (talk) 17:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Grundle I'm glad the fly swatting aritcle lives on. It's terrific. Did you see my user:ChildofMidnight/Bacon economy article? I meant to let you know that you helped inspire it! ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I love your article, and I'm glad I helped inspire it! Grundle2600 (talk) 02:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Grundle I'm glad the fly swatting aritcle lives on. It's terrific. Did you see my user:ChildofMidnight/Bacon economy article? I meant to let you know that you helped inspire it! ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I created my own account there. Grundle2600 (talk) 17:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's good stuff. Very funny and well done. I hope Drmies sees it. I'm sure he will also enjoy it. I think the weirdest thing about the Conservapedia article is that it focuses so heavily on the conspiracies and trivialities instead of the big issues. Interesting. It's a crazy world. ;) ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've been having fun reading this article and others at this liberal parody of conservapedia. You have a fun summer too! Grundle2600 (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- No worries Grundle. Thanks for creating another interesting article. I hope you're having a great summer. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Request for clarification
Please, got to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification.--Lusala lu ne Nkuka Luka (talk) 14:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
RE: Bacon
Alrighty then. Looking forward to it. Mmmm, bacon... weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Cattle
Would you be so kind as to help us out over here? Thanks. Law type! snype? 04:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
In reviewing the situation, it appears that you've used rollback incorrectly. While I understand your reasons to remove the post you removed, rollback is not intended to be used in this manner. You can use a manual method of removal, or even a twinkle "AGF" link to revert items, but "rollback" has implications in regards to the WP database which are important. Please do not use the rollback feature unless it is clearly vandalism. Mistakes happen, but if they continue, then I would be forced to remove that button - and I'd rather not do that. Please be careful. — Ched : ? 05:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think I have rollback any more. But I'll go check. I don't see all the "rollback" button things like I'm in some kind of Walmart nightmare. So I think the world is safe. Thank goodness you know who was on top of it. I haven't read the comment I accidentally removed, but I'm sure it was worthwhile. I would apologize, but I can't be bothered. :) No it's good you put it back there. I sometimes mark where I'm up to in my watchlist by clicking a bunch of stuff, so I must have accidentally clicked a rollback button. Powerful stuff! I haven't done any rollbacking at all and haven't read up on how it works yet (although I guess I know now...) so any other rollbacks I did were also in error.
- Is there a tool that can clone me? And also something to make the douche bags and trolls disappear? Like a Robocop type bot or automated tool? Or something that makes my Misplaced Pages experience more like Tron? Except not personally life threatening. Maybe like pong would be better. Or any other arcade game with infinite quarters. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't take anything away from you. You still have rollback. CoM, I like you - I like you a lot; but, STOP referring to other editors in a derogatory manner. Just because you don't agree with someone does not make them any less of human being than you. — Ched : ? 06:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't refer to anyone in a derogatory manner. You are mistaken. I can't help it if you happen to associate certain editors with the words I used, but I made no such connection to any editor real or imagined, no matter how douchey or trollific the behavior of some editors that may come to mind. Certainly there are trolls and douchebags in existence, even here on Misplaced Pages, and I don't think I should have to pretend that there aren't. I think it's unreasonable to say that I'm not allowed to ask for a tool that would eliminate them. My request is in the very goodestest of faith, and is consistent with others seeking a troll-be-gone tonic for what ails Misplaced Pages. I fully support the development of some sort of superbot that will eliminate the problem. If that's not possible then maybe a Dirty Harry type figure would do the trick. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Fine... whatever. — Ched : ? 07:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh and Chedsky, I removed your comment on the Cattle talk page. I felt it was instigated by my accidental rollback. If you still want it there feel free to put it back. But I exercised bold judgment in trying to put things back to the way they were before I tripped up. With great powers come great responsibility. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, CoM, I restored Ched's comment because 1) that comment is not yours 2) the comment is not about you 3) the comment has no incivility 4) the comment is just to suggest people in the discussion to get back to whatever main point 5) "no instigation on your accidental roll back case. He can comment whatever he wants there. I hope you do not mind my revert. I do not want you to lose your close friend just for any possible misunderstanding between two. Online discussion is tricky as you know.--Caspian blue 07:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- No worries Casp. If you understand the history and think it's a helpful comment that's fine with me. There was no ill intent on my part in removing it. I was just trying to clean up a bit of a mess (rather minor really, but still) that I had a part in making.
- I haven't been doing much shopping of late. Trying to get rid of stuff before the big move to Doc's place. So it may be a while before I can look into the root issue. Or maybe we'll never know! ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- @Casp - did you read the comment on the talk page and the discussion above it? The users are using the talk page for exactly what it was intended for. I'm going to suggest the comment is removed. Law type! snype? 08:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I read the half of the discussion. Even though you guys think that Ched's comment is a bit off, removing his comments in good faith without permission and with the edit summary would be not pleasant for him. I don't know what is Doc's place (doctor's office?)--Caspian blue 08:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- MMMMmmmmmmmmmmmoooooooooooooooooo. (How do cows talk in Korean?). ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- The "moo" sound in Korean refers to "white radish". ;) Anyway, "um-me~" is the moooo sound in Korean.--Caspian blue 08:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ched's comment has been removed (with his gracious permission) and the cattle-based editors may continue their discussion on cattle sex. Law type! snype? 08:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. I guess I should have just asked him. I'm a bit tired and it seemed like a good idea at the time. I figured he was asleep and wouldn't mind. Oh well. Is it really about cattle sex? I wrote a great article about a cattle sale once. Snuck in some juicy bits about the tool box and everything. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- The "moo" sound in Korean refers to "white radish". ;) Anyway, "um-me~" is the moooo sound in Korean.--Caspian blue 08:37, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- MMMMmmmmmmmmmmmoooooooooooooooooo. (How do cows talk in Korean?). ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I read the half of the discussion. Even though you guys think that Ched's comment is a bit off, removing his comments in good faith without permission and with the edit summary would be not pleasant for him. I don't know what is Doc's place (doctor's office?)--Caspian blue 08:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- @Casp - did you read the comment on the talk page and the discussion above it? The users are using the talk page for exactly what it was intended for. I'm going to suggest the comment is removed. Law type! snype? 08:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, CoM, I restored Ched's comment because 1) that comment is not yours 2) the comment is not about you 3) the comment has no incivility 4) the comment is just to suggest people in the discussion to get back to whatever main point 5) "no instigation on your accidental roll back case. He can comment whatever he wants there. I hope you do not mind my revert. I do not want you to lose your close friend just for any possible misunderstanding between two. Online discussion is tricky as you know.--Caspian blue 07:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh and Chedsky, I removed your comment on the Cattle talk page. I felt it was instigated by my accidental rollback. If you still want it there feel free to put it back. But I exercised bold judgment in trying to put things back to the way they were before I tripped up. With great powers come great responsibility. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Fine... whatever. — Ched : ? 07:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't refer to anyone in a derogatory manner. You are mistaken. I can't help it if you happen to associate certain editors with the words I used, but I made no such connection to any editor real or imagined, no matter how douchey or trollific the behavior of some editors that may come to mind. Certainly there are trolls and douchebags in existence, even here on Misplaced Pages, and I don't think I should have to pretend that there aren't. I think it's unreasonable to say that I'm not allowed to ask for a tool that would eliminate them. My request is in the very goodestest of faith, and is consistent with others seeking a troll-be-gone tonic for what ails Misplaced Pages. I fully support the development of some sort of superbot that will eliminate the problem. If that's not possible then maybe a Dirty Harry type figure would do the trick. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't take anything away from you. You still have rollback. CoM, I like you - I like you a lot; but, STOP referring to other editors in a derogatory manner. Just because you don't agree with someone does not make them any less of human being than you. — Ched : ? 06:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
<outdent> @Casp Isn't that very similar to the word for one of the tastes? Umo, ume, umi or something like that? Let's get this conversation back on track with the important stuff that matters! Nite all. I'll try to do some big time rollbacking tomorrow so we can really see how it works... ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Good night, CoM.--Caspian blue 09:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Umami, a loanword from Japanese, is one of the basic tastes. In Japanese, mu means nothing. Jonathunder (talk) 15:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- If I might butt in: "Ume" (sounds like "moo" in Korean) is "plum" in Japanese. Perhaps Korean cows hunger for Japanese plums? I don't remember the Japanese "moo"... seems like it's "Mo" (sounding like "Moe" from the Three Stooges)... What cultural significance that has, I won't even guess... Dekkappai (talk) 16:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks all for the clarifications. Ume is interesting too. I couldn't figure out why they were selling fresh ume for some outrageous price at my Korean store. Especially since the owner said there was no great thing to do with the fresh fruits but just to use them to make plum wine, and I'm not a big fan of plum wine. I've never understood umami either. I think it's bogus. :) And I think UFC (some sort of American bloodsport) is bogus too. But I'm getting hungry now. Oh, and when I first discovered that animals make different noises in different languages I was astounded, and I still am. Fascinating. Well, baaaaaaaaaah to all you sheeple. Dare to be different! :) Consensus and civility be damned! Let The Three Stooges be an inspiration for us all. And Charlie Chaplin too. And Will Ferrell. And Dennis Leary. And of course Doc's fav, Dennis Miller. Truth and justice are no laughing matter. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, not to get too partisan, but we're Keaton people in my household. The U.S. has yet to produce a finer writer-actor-director-stuntman in our humble estimation. Dekkappai (talk) 18:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Great. Thanks all for the clarifications. Ume is interesting too. I couldn't figure out why they were selling fresh ume for some outrageous price at my Korean store. Especially since the owner said there was no great thing to do with the fresh fruits but just to use them to make plum wine, and I'm not a big fan of plum wine. I've never understood umami either. I think it's bogus. :) And I think UFC (some sort of American bloodsport) is bogus too. But I'm getting hungry now. Oh, and when I first discovered that animals make different noises in different languages I was astounded, and I still am. Fascinating. Well, baaaaaaaaaah to all you sheeple. Dare to be different! :) Consensus and civility be damned! Let The Three Stooges be an inspiration for us all. And Charlie Chaplin too. And Will Ferrell. And Dennis Leary. And of course Doc's fav, Dennis Miller. Truth and justice are no laughing matter. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Schooling in Alabama
How about this? Drmies (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Does it remind you of your time in Reformatory school? ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Happy Bastille Day!
Dear fellow Wikipedian, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --A Nobody 17:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks ver much Nobody. I'm storming the parapets. I saw a bit of fireworks last night while I was doing my laundry. So celebration is all around. Let freedom reign. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Best-ille :), --A Nobody 18:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Bacon
How's about this for an important article to add to User:ChildofMidnight/Bacon Challenge 2010#Bacon-related - Outline of bacon? There are lots of topics covered in WP:WPOOK (which I'm not a member of) – shouldn't bacon be one of them? --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 18:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know much about outlines on Misplaced Pages although I saw some issue arise over them recently, but it sounds like a great idea and has my full support. I also think there should be a bacon portal. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment!
Glad I could help. hgilbert (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
...
...do you really want Claw Boys Claw 3 in 1 deleted or merged? Drmies (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- BTW, you should really have another look at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Londonstani. I don't know how to say this in a politically correct enough sort of way, but you were wrong. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- That's an interesting take Doc. But considering the first two votes were to delete at which point I came in with a life preserving "Merge with Gautam Malkani, the author. Enough notability (substantial coverage in reliable source) for book and author to warrant including together," your preference for a stand-alone is a minor difference and one that I'm not convinced is superior. But I think it's good that you followed my lead in realizing that there was enough notability to warrant preserving the content. As long as you stick with me you're not likely to go too far off course. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- So--you were only half wrong? I accept your apology. Much obliged! (And thanks for the tweaks. I promise I won't roll 'em back until tomorrow.) Drmies (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I accept both of your apologies (and those of the millions of others who haven't offered one)—cheers! Bongomatic 09:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I want to apologize for not being able to better guide Drmies to more useful pursuits than expanding that blob of an article. The only interesting part of it is the assertion that there is something called the "Londonstani" effect, something that isn't even explained in the article so we don't know what that even means. As far as you go Bongo, shouldn't you be deleting something? There are thousands of article just waiting to be put out of their misery. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it is explained now. So there. And that effect, you may find it interesting, but it doesn't apply to you--you weren't highly touted. Now, can you get back to work? I'm sure there's a forgotten Dutch architect or a demolished 1950s diner which the world simply HAS to know about. Drmies (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I accept both of your apologies (and those of the millions of others who haven't offered one)—cheers! Bongomatic 09:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- So--you were only half wrong? I accept your apology. Much obliged! (And thanks for the tweaks. I promise I won't roll 'em back until tomorrow.) Drmies (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- That's an interesting take Doc. But considering the first two votes were to delete at which point I came in with a life preserving "Merge with Gautam Malkani, the author. Enough notability (substantial coverage in reliable source) for book and author to warrant including together," your preference for a stand-alone is a minor difference and one that I'm not convinced is superior. But I think it's good that you followed my lead in realizing that there was enough notability to warrant preserving the content. As long as you stick with me you're not likely to go too far off course. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Ancient Egyptian Race Controversy
Regarding your reply to Vassyana: Why are you angry at ArbCom? Ice Cold Beer is not a member of ArbCom. Moreover, it is up to administrators in general topolice the acts of other administrators. I can understand why you feel there is some failure in the system, but I do not understand why you direct your anger at ArbCom when the failure seems to lie directly with Ice Cold Beer and a handful of other admins, none of whom are on ArbCom.
I mention this for tactical reasons too - it is still quite possible that ArbCom will be open to hearing a case against ICB or others you consider to be disruptive editors. My guess is that ArbCom will say this is not their jurisdiction and should be settlesat AN/I. That would be a victory for the banned users. As long as this is possibl, what, practically, is gained from attacking ArbCom? Slrubenstein | Talk 10:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- When an admin makes a ban or a block it shouldn't take weeks to get it reviewed. Shuffling people around telling them they are in the wrong queue wherever they go is uncivil and rude. Arbcom needs to shape up. It's about more than this one case. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- This article has long since been poisoned, and there are too many ego's involved now that can't allow it to progress properly. Fresh approach - let's request that the article be officially renamed as "History of the Ancient Egyptian race controversy", and then edit it further as such. Once that is done we can create a separate article/s to deal with other aspects that are ommited here, or build that content into other existing articles if more appropriate. What do you think? Wdford (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think the focus needs to be on reversing the abusive bannings and the disruption caused by Dbachmann and administrators willing to side with him in order to push a particular point of view. I'm confident that once those issues are resolved, the editors working in good faith on the article can sort out their differences and move forward (as they have in the past). Trying to accomplish dramatic changes to the article while the administrative issues and the bans are still in place will be unhelpful and counterproductive. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- This article has long since been poisoned, and there are too many ego's involved now that can't allow it to progress properly. Fresh approach - let's request that the article be officially renamed as "History of the Ancient Egyptian race controversy", and then edit it further as such. Once that is done we can create a separate article/s to deal with other aspects that are ommited here, or build that content into other existing articles if more appropriate. What do you think? Wdford (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
It is not up to ArbCom to review this block. You grant ArbCom powers that it does not have. It is up to the community of other admins to support or revoke the block. ArbCom has nothing to do with this and you're looking to ArbCom is tantamount to your giving ArbCom powers that belong to the community. Slrubenstein | Talk 20:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- The clear consensus at ANI was that as the remedy related to an Arbcom decision, Arbcom would have to make a determination on whether this application of sanction is appropriate. Admins refusing to deal with matters where Arbcom is involved is often a problem. Arbcom could direct the issue back to the community, but so far they've just dithered and bitched about where the issues should be taken up, disruptive activity that has wasted the time and energy of all the involved parties. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
You just have lazy admins. You need an admin to say, "FILE a complaint at ArbCom, or lets deal with it ouselves, but there is no middle gound. Slrubenstein | Talk 23:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Please give the link to where exactly at AN/I it says that. Slrubenstein | Talk
- I don't think I was the only one, but I can affirm that I said they should appeal the block at WP:AE. LadyofShalott 23:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
In hot sizzling summer
I have come to apologize for my overreaction to you yesterday. The passage "delicate man" is a parody of Law's comment on Ched's personality, so I joked with it, but it conveyed as a different and odd meaning, so I was upset at it. I'm okay for you to call me a nick name other than Casp. (Caspi would be perfectly fine). I tend to not go easy in this hot and sizzling summer, so I'm reducing my activity on writing articles during the season...You can find me working on FPC or other image areas that do not require reading texts, reviewing nice images is fun.--Caspian blue 19:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Caspian blue, you've been an extraordinarily helpful editor and a very good friend to me. I very much appreciate your integrity and your good humor. There is a lot of craziness here on Misplaced Pages, and there are times when it gets to all of us with its ups and downs. I know I make mistakes sometimes, but I hope you'll overlook them and keep in mind that I'm just trying make Misplaced Pages a little more complete and informative, and have a good time doing it. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:The Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout
May I ask whose bright idea this was?--Sky Attacker 00:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Jayron32 I think. I don't know if you're being sarcastic or serious (this page tends to be fairly sarcastic) but I think it's a fabulous idea. Are you in? ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just stalking here. The idea was actually User:F203's, who raised the idea at WP:ANI. I just took his idea and ran with it. Based on his idea, I created the project. Invite anyone you can. It starts in 2 days! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 01:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Well you know, I've created no articles at all this month and this could be a good time to clear the WebHamster incident from memory. It should never have happened and hopefully, if I took a break from helping out at ANI, I would have a good excuse to make some great article developments. I read a comment the other day saying that if everyone spent time resolving dramas at AN/I the encyclopedia would look the same now as it did in 2005. --Sky Attacker 01:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sign up! Then we can razz you if you give in to the inescapable magnetism of drama!!! ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Child. Imagine if you know who signed up.--Sky Attacker 01:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- and it can't come any too soon either. ;) — Ched : ? 17:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Bacon portal
Sorry for the late reply to #Bacon, but I was busy for the most part yesterday, then I got caught up in a talk page thread this morning, then I spent the entire afternoon reading up on the deletion policy. What sort of contents do you think would go well in a bacon portal? --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 01:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
done ...
... per your request on my talk page here, I've "rolledback" your rights ... sorry, I couldn't resist the pun. ;-) Cheerio. — Ched : ? 17:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Ched! It's been interesting. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for creating America’s Affordable Health Choices Act. I proposed a few categories and redirects on the article's talk page - no drama - nothing controversial! Have fun! Grundle2600 (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Everything is controversial.
- I posted to you above somewhere about my bacon economy article that's under construction. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- What I meant was that my proposed edits (categories and redirects) to the health care bill article were not controversial. I saw your comment on your bacon article, and responded to it. It's in the Electro-kinetic road ramp section. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I understood what you meant, and I stand by my statement that everything is controversial. Thanks for the reply on the BE article. It needs some work. But part of the concept was to mimic the:
- Hydrogen economy
- Lithium economy
- Methanol economy
- Liquid nitrogen economy
- Vegetable oil economy
- Zinc economy articles.
- Anyway, it needs a bit more sourcing to establish notability. ;) ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, I was very well aware that it was a satire of those kinds of articles. Grundle2600 (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- What I meant was that my proposed edits (categories and redirects) to the health care bill article were not controversial. I saw your comment on your bacon article, and responded to it. It's in the Electro-kinetic road ramp section. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:The Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout/Log has a list of articles that people started during the dramaout. Although the dramaout has not officially started, given that you started this article in response to my request on the dramaout page, I think it would be OK if you added it to the list, if you wanted to. I started the dramaout early, and I added Madison Keyes to the list. Grundle2600 (talk) 20:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC) That was fast! Grundle2600 (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Wal-Mart (disambiguation) at DR
Just letting you know that the discussion for Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wal-Mart (disambiguation) (3rd nomination) has been listed for deletion review at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2009 July 15. You may be interested in commenting. Tatterfly (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for all the times we've shared. It's been great but I'll be lucky to be around for another 24 hours. I really, really, really want to stay at Misplaced Pages, but the WebHamster incident has gone way too far. Yes, the situation has always been between about WebHamster and Noloop but I think my involvement in the situation has pissed a few people off too. I thought I would put an end to a problem by warning WebHamster for his actions, but it only made things worse. After leaving a nasty message on my talk page, I thought a civility message would set him straight but it only allowed this mess to carry-on. I left a message saying that although I didn't fully agree with his actions, I would forgive him and would try to "leave him alone" as he wanted. I still don't understand why he still responded in the same way because I left him alone and carried on as though it had never happened. Yes, Noloop has been dragging this on for too long, but my failed attempts at resolving their conflict backfired into this explosion. With the exception of a thank you note for reverting vandalism to my userpage, I have not edited his page since and I have not edited Malleus' talk page either. And apart from endorsing Abce2's comment at the RfC I've have completely let it be. I have not certified the RfC.
But I think some people are somewhat pissed off with me, even if they don't say it, and are more pissed off with the other two editors who always have been more involved than myself. For this reason this could be my last day on Misplaced Pages. I want to stay more than anything else, but not if it means pissing people off. I just wanted to thank you for the times we have shared over the past few months and say that if I'm no longer here at the end of the day....goodbye CoM.--Sky Attacker 22:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sky I'm unsure if any of this has to with my expression of my opinions on that situation or not, but speaking for myself I don't have any concern over the course of action you've chosen. You're certainly not alone in being unhappy with the aggressive wording used by that editor on his talk page. I would encourage you not to certify the RfC, but I'm only in charge of my own choices and I try to be respectful of the decisions made by others as long as they're consistent with policies, basic good sense and morality. Sometimes I agree with other editors and sometimes I disagree. Even when I'm unhappy about something I try not to hold any grudges. As long as decisions are made in good faith and with respect, I don't see that there should be a problem. I'm not sure why you are worked up over this particular incident (it seems relatively minor to me), but you're always encrouaged to take a break if you need one. Misplaced Pages is a confusing and intriguing world all its own. There is a lot of good that goes on here, a lot of interesting discussion and process, and an awful lot of nonsense. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Seems like a very small storm in a rather small teacup to me as well. Noloop has carried this minor spat way too far, and (s)he may come to regret that, but I dont see that it reflects on you Sky Attacker. Live and let live say I. --Malleus Fatuorum 23:16, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- BTW, I just noticed that you quoted me at the top of this page. :lol: --Malleus Fatuorum 23:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
It actually has more to do with Drmies saying "Not to mention, you were told to fuck off, right?". I don't know in what tone his/her reply was supposed to be in but I got worked up because it sounded as though, even my ally editors that I trusted the most were pissed off with me and wanted me to "fuck off" as well.
You are right, this is a minor incident that is almost entirely WebHamster vs. Noloop. Maybe I'm just overreacting right now, but I'm worked up because I never intended to piss off anybody. Hopefully, I haven't.--Sky Attacker 23:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmmm... I wasn't sure what he meant, but I took it as a comment on the thread(s) where that phrase was the center of attention. AGF and all, seemed like it could be a funny joke to me. Maybe you should ask him to clarify. If it turns out he was being serious, it still wouldn't be that big of a deal. The guy is Dutch and a communist after all. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- A final word to the wise. If you do anything worthwhile around here Sky then you will upset someone. Just the way it is. Doesn't matter though unless you have aspirations to pass an RfA, in which case you're better off ignoring articles altogether, and focusing your attention on the drama pits instead. --Malleus Fatuorum 00:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Sky Attacker, please don't leave! Just because you are feeling upset over an incident doesn't mean you should leave. Heck, I think that if a wikipedia editor has never stirred up at least some trouble, they are being too timid and uncreative in their edits. I was going to suggest that you join us at Misplaced Pages:The Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout, but I see you already signed up for it. The worst thing in the world is to give up hope. If you feel that you are having trouble with a certain area of wikipedia, there are plenty of other areas where you may be happier. Please stay! Grundle2600 (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:NODRAMA
I'm way ahead of ya. :) –Juliancolton | 22:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's good advice. Your last post on the Giano AN/I thread seemed to be designed to stir it up and keep it going. I hope no one takes the bait. Auntie E (talk) 05:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- If a blocking admin is the one to unblock it saves a lot of drama. As the drama continued long after I went to sleep, it seems to me the problem lies with the admin's refusal to act prudently and according to consensus, instead calling for someone to overturn his judgment if they see fit. HOw unhelpful! Finding fault with the editor calling repeatedly for prudent action to end the drama seems a bit out of line. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Food articles
I thought you might be interested in reading these:
Grundle2600 (talk) 00:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Matt Sanchez
Hello, I want to thank you for sticking to standards on the Matt Sanchez article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.163.18.130 (talk) 14:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- If anyone watching my page wants to help fix the article so it's less of a smear job and so the subject of the article gets to speak for himself instead of just being attacked please do so. I'm outnumbered by POV pushers who hold our BLP policies and guidelines in disdain. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:47, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- To concentrate on specifics. 1. The lede and the reference to Ann Coulter make no sense and are inappropriate. I never called anyone a "faggot" and this places undue emphasis on that fact.
2.
HRS
Lead looks good! Thanks for the bold tweak. -- Samir 16:44, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Looked it over... the wording is definitely correct, and conveys things in a simpler way. Thanks man! Hope this gets through FAC. Take care -- Samir 17:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:NODRAMA reminder
Thanks for signing up for the Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout. Misplaced Pages stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at Misplaced Pages:The Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 21:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:America’s Affordable Health Choices Act
Hi. Please see Talk:America’s Affordable Health Choices Act. Thanks. Grundle2600 (talk) 01:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK
Did you know that ArbCom has formed a new council to devise new forms of Misplaced Pages governance(Misplaced Pages:Advisory Council on Project Development)? I thought you might be interested in looking over who has been made a member of this council. They were not selected through any kind of transparent process. I have strong doubts about at least one of them, based on this comment, which I believe would be of interest to you. You and I know Misplaced Pages has problems that need to be addressed. Is a council with this member going to address them? Slrubenstein | Talk 10:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
this provides more context and discussion of the issue at hand. Slrubenstein | Talk 19:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. I'm engaged in the no drama days 2009 campaign, so I'm focused on article stuff for the time being. But I think a think tank type committee to consider reforms seems like a reasonable idea. I understand the concerns about how it is formed and who is included on it, but I hope these issues can be worked out. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
The Hut
Did you find any mention of the Hof's Hut that used to be near John Wayne airport. I actually met John Wayne, when I was 1.5 years old, at that location. According to family legend, he called me a 'little buckaroo' and patted me on the head. Law type! snype? 23:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like that one may have gotten gobbled up in an office tower project discussed here in this 1998 article . But there is a statue of J.W. at the airport, no doubt in commemoration of your meeting with him buckaroo. Go get 'em. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think it is still there. Yeah, I was a huge influence on that statue, as well as his progressive views in an interview for Playboy. Haha. Law type! snype? 00:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid it's not on their website whipper snapper . But it might have been turned into a Lucille's smokehouse. Good ole fashioned beer, busty waitresses and BBQ are in young man. Pull up a stool. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- On second thought, I don't see a Lucille's there either . But if you're ever up in this neck of the woods we'll hit the one here, or we can do up some Pho, alrighty partner? ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think it is still there. Yeah, I was a huge influence on that statue, as well as his progressive views in an interview for Playboy. Haha. Law type! snype? 00:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
What is your neck of the woods? I'll do pho over Hof's bro. Law type! snype? 00:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- South Bay, Los Angeles. Home of many wealthy beachgoers, a stop on the AVP tour and home field for my flag football team on Hermosa Beach. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- Welp, I'm going to be relocating to Foothill Ranch in about 3 weeks, so I would say it is a real possibility. I want to try Korean BBQ in LA. Law type! snype? 00:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Courtesy note
This is a courtesy note to inform you that the set of five recent Ancient Egyptian race controversy topic bans by Ice Cold Beer (talk · contribs) has been raised at arbitration enforcement for review: Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Ancient Egyptian race controversy ban review. I am informing you because you are an involved party or commented at the arbitration clarification request. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to leave me a talk page message. --Vassyana (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Battle of the Oranges
Hello! Your submission of Battle of the Oranges at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The hook says it's the largest "food fight", but the source says it's the largest "fruit fight". Maybe there is no difference, unless there is a larger pie fight, or some other type of food fight. Can the hook be revised or a more specific reference used? Rlendog (talk) 01:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
If you could look in....
I am considering going live with User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/National Fibromyalgia Association. I'm feeling pretty good about 10 hours of work. Please take a look and advise of any concerns. Thank you, MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there!
Hi. Restore Our American Mustangs Act might be a good idea for an article. Breitbart.com has this article. Here is a government website on it. Grundle2600 (talk) 16:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. Thanks also for the beer flood and other article. I haven't had a chance to look at them much yet. Is there an article on the credit card reform bill that passed? Maybe an article on legislation passed by year or something would be good. Or I guess they should be mentioned in relevant presidential article, but of course I'm not supposed to edit those. I see Walpin is in the news. The firing(s) really should be its own article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, Credit CARD Act of 2009 already has its own article. I thought you might enjoy creating an article with the word "mustang" in the title, but you don't have to if you won't want to. Grundle2600 (talk) 17:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Re:Burger Heaven
I'm happy to help. By the way, see User:Law's edit summary--Sky Attacker 20:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw that. Funny. Since the awesomeness of the pizzaburger couldn't be reliably verified I found another source that at least mentions it. And then I discovered that coverage of the origins of old school New York style brick oven pizza from Brooklyn, Harlem and New Haven were sadly lacking. So there's a lot of work to be done. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Gerald Walpin
Well, first of all, telling someone that their closing was "weak and biased" doesn't tend to be the best way of getting them to reverse it. Still, I've had a look, and given that Walpin's article is merely 11.6K and this incredibly important event takes up just ten lines of text seems to only reinforce the fact that it was, in fact, the correct close. This is backed up when you see that, of those opining "Keep" on the AfD, five haven't edited since, one has been topic-banned from Obama articles, and one has been found to be a sock and blocked. Funny, that. Still, if you can create an article that addresses the original concerns in userspace, feel free to request it be re-created at DRV. (Incidentally, of those new sources, the first one is a blog, and the second one is a re-print of the third, so there's effectively only one useful source there). Black Kite 21:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- If you don't think Jack Tapper's ABC New blog is a reliable source you should take it that noticeboard. The notability guidelines are clearly met, but given the silliness of your original closing rationale, your response is as expected. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- To repeat; I am not going to alter a close that I still believe to be correct (indeed, even more so than at the time, given what we now know about a number of participants in it) and so WP:DRV is your next port of call. Also, since you are unable to communicate civilly, this conversation is now at an end. Black Kite 21:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Here's the discussion: . Your coatrack argument, aside from showing your personal bias, is irrelevant because that's an editing issue. The fact that the controversy is still in the news clearly shows it meets our notability guidelines. And there was no consensus to close as delete in the first place. Your "notnews" argument has also been disproved by it being an ongoing story that is continuing. Statements like "Very few of the Keep arguments hold any water" are highly uncivil and inappropriate. If you want to be treated with respect you should abide by our policies and show respect to good faith editors. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- To repeat; I am not going to alter a close that I still believe to be correct (indeed, even more so than at the time, given what we now know about a number of participants in it) and so WP:DRV is your next port of call. Also, since you are unable to communicate civilly, this conversation is now at an end. Black Kite 21:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Pink Dot
It's too short. It needs 780 more characters. You want to help me expand it in the next hour? I have to head to school soon. Law type! snype? 22:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)