| Revision as of 18:19, 21 July 2009 editCoppertwig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,249 edits →Discussion at COIN: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:19, 21 July 2009 edit undoCoppertwig (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,249 edits Archiving two threadsNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == ] == | |||
| This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. {{User|Canadian Monkey}}, {{User|G-Dett}}, {{User|MeteorMaker}}, {{User|Nickhh}}, {{User|Nishidani}}, {{User|NoCal100}}, and {{User|Pedrito}} are prohibited from editing any Arab-Israeli conflict-related article/talk page or discussing on the dispute anywhere else on the project. {{admin|Jayjg}} is also prohibited from editing in the area of conflict, and he is stripped of his status as a ] and any and all associated privileged access, including the ] and ] tools and the '']'', '']'', and '']'' mailing lists. Jayjg is also thanked for his years of service. | |||
| After six months, these editors may individually ask the ] to lift their editing restrictions after demonstrating commitment to the goals of Misplaced Pages and ability to work constructively with other editors. However, restrictions may be temporarily suspended for the exclusive purpose of participating in the ] for this area. | |||
| In the meantime, the community is strongly urged to pursue current discussions to come to a definitive consensus on the preferred current and historical names of the region that is the source of conflict in this case. Note that this must be consistent with current Misplaced Pages guidelines on ], a ], and ]. This decision will be appended onto this case within two months from the close of the case. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, '''<font face="times new roman">]]</font>''' 17:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ''']''' | |||
| == Checkuser and Oversight access == | |||
| Dear user, I've removed your Checkuser and Oversight access as per signed request and ArbCom ruling. I hope that you will accept my "thank you" for your efforts in those areas and my best wishes for your continuing collaboration on any Wikimedia project. | |||
| :Ciao, ] (]) 20:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Well-wishes == | == Well-wishes == | ||
Revision as of 18:19, 21 July 2009
| This is a subpage of Jayjg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
 Archives |
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Well-wishes
Jayjg has not been around in over a month. I hope he does not return any time to soon, just to see how he has been unfairly treated by the Arbitration Committee. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 17:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to hear about all this unpleasantness, Jayjg. I hope you return; until then, you are missed. Sic transit gloria wiki. – Quadell 19:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Jayjg. Unlike other editors, I do not think the arbitration committee’s decision is much of a tragedy for you. According to my impression, your main purpose in editing the wikipedia has always been to write good and professional articles and not to promote some ideology. This is evident from your extensive high quality contributions over the years. Please continue to contribute and thank you for all the hard work you have put into this encyclopedia. Best Tkalisky (talk) 04:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Jay. I wrote what I thought of the decision on Nishidani's talk page. BTW, when you return I hope you'll take a look at the nice things he said about you there.John Z (talk) 06:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Hard to know what to say. I'm sorry things worked out the way they did. I hope to see you around the wiki. All the best. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 23:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Jayjg is one of the finest, most respectful, and most objective editors on Misplaced Pages. This was an unfair decision.Historicist (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Damn straight it was. Wikifan12345 (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I check from time to time to see if you are editing again. I do hope that you will. It is a great pity that bullying and injustice chases reliable editors away from Misplaced Pages.Historicist (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
The rain it raineth on the just And also on the unjust fella; But chiefly on the just, because The unjust steals the just's umbrella.' - Lord BowenHistoricist (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge
I've just proposed merging Unification Church and antisemitism (which you worked on) into Divine Principle. Please join in the discussion, if you like. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
about the All Palestine Government page:
hey I need your help on the All-Palestine Government page. Harlan, who I think you know from edit wars he has started, is going on in the talk page about the All-Palestine Government, citing one guy's opinion from the State Department, and using this to justify the overt bias on the page of the All Palestine Government, for the fact it has only one source, a "New Historian" and doesn't show that it was a puppet state. Also, there are tons of pages which could use your helpTallicfan20 (talk) 08:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Notification of arbcom discussion
Your actions have been discussed here as relevant to an ongoing arbitration case. You may wish to comment. I have linked a prior version of the page because the person who added this material reverted it and then incorporated the material by reference to the reversion, so as to make it impossible for you simply to search for your name. (Hope that's not too confusing.) Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Discussion at COIN
At WP:COIN#Circumcision your name was mentioned several times. I thought I would let you know in case you might want to comment there. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)