| Revision as of 00:45, 22 July 2009 editCatterick (talk | contribs)920 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:22, 22 July 2009 edit undoThe Red Hat of Pat Ferrick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,461 editsm Reverted edits by Catterick (talk) to last version by SnowdedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hey, baby...what's up? | Hey, baby...what's up? | ||
| :So, you permit bullying and use wikilawyering as a way to silence the bullied? If you haven't noticed, it's an old fight of many against one. There is no escape if I am the same account, for they really hate me and you are finding a way to give them what they want. Good riddance to your naivete. Go ahead and wash your hands of this, Pilate. ] (]) 23:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Twinkle and rollback == | |||
| ::It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. ] (]) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. ] (]) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Rollback via Twinkle is not to be used in content disputes like the one at ]. Please stop blindly reverting and instead discuss your changes on the article's talk page. ] 23:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You idiots always demand I explain myself on the talk pages and always delete my explanations, with snide comments in the edit summary, but no reply on the talk. It is a catch-22, so fuck you too. ] (]) 00:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You've been blocked for violating the ] on ]. As your block log shows that you have had a previous 3RR block, I have set the block to expire in 48 hours. ] 23:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == July 2009 == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:72 hours|a period of '''72 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for engaging in an ]{{#if:English people| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|— ]<span style="color: #999;"> // </span>] 23:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
Revision as of 08:22, 22 July 2009
Hey, baby...what's up?
Twinkle and rollback
Rollback via Twinkle is not to be used in content disputes like the one at English people. Please stop blindly reverting and instead discuss your changes on the article's talk page. Nakon 23:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- You've been blocked for violating the three revert rule on English people. As your block log shows that you have had a previous 3RR block, I have set the block to expire in 48 hours. Nakon 23:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
