| Revision as of 08:22, 22 July 2009 editThe Red Hat of Pat Ferrick (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,461 editsm Reverted edits by Catterick (talk) to last version by Snowded← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:32, 22 July 2009 edit undoBigDunc (talk | contribs)Rollbackers16,576 edits restore editor is permitted to vent on their own talk page and block increase is wrong for venting what editor sees as a bad block also assumed notice is read if user removes itNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hey, baby...what's up? | Hey, baby...what's up? | ||
| :So, you permit bullying and use wikilawyering as a way to silence the bullied? If you haven't noticed, it's an old fight of many against one. There is no escape if I am the same account, for they really hate me and you are finding a way to give them what they want. Good riddance to your naivete. Go ahead and wash your hands of this, Pilate. ] (]) 23:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. ] (]) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Twinkle and rollback == | |||
| :::If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. ] (]) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You idiots always demand I explain myself on the talk pages and always delete my explanations, with snide comments in the edit summary, but no reply on the talk. It is a catch-22, so fuck you too. ] (]) 00:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Rollback via Twinkle is not to be used in content disputes like the one at ]. Please stop blindly reverting and instead discuss your changes on the article's talk page. ] 23:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :You've been blocked for violating the ] on ]. As your block log shows that you have had a previous 3RR block, I have set the block to expire in 48 hours. ] 23:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == July 2009 == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:72 hours|a period of '''72 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for engaging in an ]{{#if:English people| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|— ]<span style="color: #999;"> // </span>] 23:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
Revision as of 12:32, 22 July 2009
Hey, baby...what's up?
- So, you permit bullying and use wikilawyering as a way to silence the bullied? If you haven't noticed, it's an old fight of many against one. There is no escape if I am the same account, for they really hate me and you are finding a way to give them what they want. Good riddance to your naivete. Go ahead and wash your hands of this, Pilate. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- You idiots always demand I explain myself on the talk pages and always delete my explanations, with snide comments in the edit summary, but no reply on the talk. It is a catch-22, so fuck you too. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 00:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)