Misplaced Pages

User talk:Catterick: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:32, 22 July 2009 editBigDunc (talk | contribs)Rollbackers16,576 edits restore editor is permitted to vent on their own talk page and block increase is wrong for venting what editor sees as a bad block also assumed notice is read if user removes it← Previous edit Revision as of 12:44, 22 July 2009 edit undoAitias (talk | contribs)Rollbackers50,076 edits rmv personal attack - if you restore this once again you'll be blocked as well.Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
::It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. ] (]) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC) ::It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. ] (]) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
:::If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. ] (]) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC) :::If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. ] (]) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
::::You idiots always demand I explain myself on the talk pages and always delete my explanations, with snide comments in the edit summary, but no reply on the talk. It is a catch-22, so fuck you too. ] (]) 00:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:44, 22 July 2009

Hey, baby...what's up?

So, you permit bullying and use wikilawyering as a way to silence the bullied? If you haven't noticed, it's an old fight of many against one. There is no escape if I am the same account, for they really hate me and you are finding a way to give them what they want. Good riddance to your naivete. Go ahead and wash your hands of this, Pilate. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 23:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
It looks like you don't intend to wash yourself of this stench so soon. Okay then, stay awhile and do their dirty work, while they take a break. It's so easy to puppet admins these days. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 04:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
If anybody truly had a content dispute with what I have edited, they would clearly delineate it on the talk page, not spew a vague borderline insult that it was "gibberish". That is nothing to do with the information itself, but a personal attack. A Merry Old Soul (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)