Misplaced Pages

User talk:Haizum: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:57, 6 December 2005 editHaizum (talk | contribs)3,156 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:59, 6 December 2005 edit undoHaizum (talk | contribs)3,156 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered ]. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Test2 (second level warning) --> --] 15:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC) Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered ]. If you would like to experiment, use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Test2 (second level warning) --> --] 15:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)






Line 11: Line 9:


-H -H



You '''blanked the entire page out''', that is not acceptable by wikipedia standards. You should have went through the history then and found a copy that was not vandalized and restore that version instead of simply blanking an entire page out. A lot of people have worked on that particular article and to just wipe it out is totally irresponsible and inconsiderate of those who put their time into it. I'm restoring the complaint logged against you by ] & if you wish to take this up with the admins, go ahead. They've countlessly been blocking people who have done similiar things to that particular page as well. '''Next time''' do not blank a page, instead work to correct it if anything. --] 15:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC) You '''blanked the entire page out''', that is not acceptable by wikipedia standards. You should have went through the history then and found a copy that was not vandalized and restore that version instead of simply blanking an entire page out. A lot of people have worked on that particular article and to just wipe it out is totally irresponsible and inconsiderate of those who put their time into it. I'm restoring the complaint logged against you by ] & if you wish to take this up with the admins, go ahead. They've countlessly been blocking people who have done similiar things to that particular page as well. '''Next time''' do not blank a page, instead work to correct it if anything. --] 15:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:59, 6 December 2005

Please stop adding nonsense to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Fire Star 15:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


All I did was delete the vandalism, then I left a note saying I did.

You should have checked the history before you accused me of screwing up the page.

Please restore my status or I will have no choice but to report it to higher-ups.

-H


You blanked the entire page out, that is not acceptable by wikipedia standards. You should have went through the history then and found a copy that was not vandalized and restore that version instead of simply blanking an entire page out. A lot of people have worked on that particular article and to just wipe it out is totally irresponsible and inconsiderate of those who put their time into it. I'm restoring the complaint logged against you by Fire Star & if you wish to take this up with the admins, go ahead. They've countlessly been blocking people who have done similiar things to that particular page as well. Next time do not blank a page, instead work to correct it if anything. --LifeStar 15:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


THE PAGE WAS ALREADY BLANKED OUT!

If I ever see the page blanked out again with crude language or pictures, I won't do anything lest I be blamed for something I clearly didn't do.