| Revision as of 20:34, 23 July 2009 editJbarta (talk | contribs)9,777 edits Let's not get carried away predicting what/who/how the (arguably weak) consensus may change. Letting folks know this has been discussed previously is helpful. Leading is not.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:38, 23 July 2009 edit undoDems on the move (talk | contribs)1,749 edits Undid revision 303805732 by Jbarta) "weak concensus" is a POV. This is a basic warning that trying to argue the matter again is futile.Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| {{FAQ row | {{FAQ row | ||
| |q=Q2<nowiki>:</nowiki>Can we discuss renaming the article or removing the "fringe" labeling? | |q=Q2<nowiki>:</nowiki>Can we discuss renaming the article or removing the "fringe" labeling? | ||
| |a='''A2''': Yes. ], so new perspective on this issue is welcome, but please review the archives to see past discussions on this topic, and keep in mind ] and ] when you frame your discussion.}} | |a='''A2''': Yes. ], so new perspective on this issue is welcome, but please review the archives to see past discussions on this topic, and keep in mind ] and ] when you frame your discussion. Note that unless new references in ] claim that the theories are mainstream and no longer fringe, it is unlikely that a change in concensus would form.}} | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 23 July 2009
 | Below are answers to frequently asked questions about the corresponding page Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories. They address concerns, questions, and misconceptions which have repeatedly arisen on the talk page. Please update this material when needed. |
To view the response to a question, click the link to the right of the question.