| Revision as of 13:14, 23 July 2009 editParsecboy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,875 edits create nomination page | Revision as of 12:36, 26 July 2009 edit undoTony1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors275,978 edits →Kaiser class battleshipNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Another one of my German battleship FACs, this article was significantly rewritten over the past couple of months. It passed GA in May and ] A-class review a few days ago. I think the article is at or close to FA standards; any comments that help me get all the way there are appreciated. I've added alt text to the images, though I'm still a little unsure of how that's supposed to be done, so if it needs work, please let me know. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 13:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | Another one of my German battleship FACs, this article was significantly rewritten over the past couple of months. It passed GA in May and ] A-class review a few days ago. I think the article is at or close to FA standards; any comments that help me get all the way there are appreciated. I've added alt text to the images, though I'm still a little unsure of how that's supposed to be done, so if it needs work, please let me know. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 13:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| 'Tis good, as far as Cr. 1a goes. | |||
| *] advises against the linking of common geographical locations (like Germany). Any reason to here? It's a very big article. I see that "German Imperial Navy" is linked a second later ... | |||
| *"Kaiser" is italicised at the opening, but not in the title. Is this correct? | |||
| *Minus sign for -8. It's in the edit tools under the edit window ("Insert" tab), before the multiplication sign. | |||
| *I think MOSNUM says to spell out 160 here: "160 99.9 lb shells". | |||
| *Avoid multihyphen bracket monster by inverting the order: "the ships had a 4 cm (1.6 in)-thick torpedo bulkhead" -> "the ships had a torpedo bulkhead 4 cm (1.6 in) thick". | |||
| *"yards"—do we provide metric equivalents for this situation? | |||
| *"caliber" is US spelling; I'd have thought this had enough reference to the UK to be otherwise, but maybe I'm wrong. ] ] 12:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:36, 26 July 2009
Kaiser class battleship
- Nominator(s): Parsecboy (talk) 13:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
| Toolbox |
|---|
Another one of my German battleship FACs, this article was significantly rewritten over the past couple of months. It passed GA in May and WP:MILHIST A-class review a few days ago. I think the article is at or close to FA standards; any comments that help me get all the way there are appreciated. I've added alt text to the images, though I'm still a little unsure of how that's supposed to be done, so if it needs work, please let me know. Thanks in advance. Parsecboy (talk) 13:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
'Tis good, as far as Cr. 1a goes.
- WP:LINK advises against the linking of common geographical locations (like Germany). Any reason to here? It's a very big article. I see that "German Imperial Navy" is linked a second later ...
- "Kaiser" is italicised at the opening, but not in the title. Is this correct?
- Minus sign for -8. It's in the edit tools under the edit window ("Insert" tab), before the multiplication sign.
- I think MOSNUM says to spell out 160 here: "160 99.9 lb shells".
- Avoid multihyphen bracket monster by inverting the order: "the ships had a 4 cm (1.6 in)-thick torpedo bulkhead" -> "the ships had a torpedo bulkhead 4 cm (1.6 in) thick".
- "yards"—do we provide metric equivalents for this situation?
- "caliber" is US spelling; I'd have thought this had enough reference to the UK to be otherwise, but maybe I'm wrong. Tony (talk) 12:36, 26 July 2009 (UTC)