Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jefffire: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:58, 29 July 2009 editJefffire (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers4,518 edits →Unneeded snarkiness← Previous edit Revision as of 20:48, 29 July 2009 edit undoRandom user 39849958 (talk | contribs)19,517 edits →Unneeded snarkinessNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
I don't appreciate your personal attacks and . I don't believe that these comments are helpful in anyway to our goal of good article writing. I am asking you to please refactor/remove your snarky comments per ] and specifically ]. Thank you. -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC) I don't appreciate your personal attacks and . I don't believe that these comments are helpful in anyway to our goal of good article writing. I am asking you to please refactor/remove your snarky comments per ] and specifically ]. Thank you. -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
:You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. ] (]) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC) :You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. ] (]) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
:: I would disagree with you and ask you to ]. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of ], ], etc. as you do. So I ask nicely you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and if after you've done so, you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:48, 29 July 2009

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Unneeded snarkiness

I don't appreciate your personal attacks here and here. I don't believe that these comments are helpful in anyway to our goal of good article writing. I am asking you to please refactor/remove your snarky comments per WP:TALK and specifically WP:NPA. Thank you. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. Jefffire (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I would disagree with you and ask you to assume good faith. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of WP:RS, WP:V, etc. as you do. So I ask nicely you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and if after you've done so, you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)