Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jefffire: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:49, 29 July 2009 editRandom user 39849958 (talk | contribs)19,517 editsm →Unneeded snarkiness← Previous edit Revision as of 06:03, 30 July 2009 edit undoJefffire (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers4,518 edits →Unneeded snarkinessNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
:You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. ] (]) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC) :You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. ] (]) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
:: I would disagree with you and ask you to ]. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of ], ], etc. as you do. So I ask nicely of you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and after you've done so, if you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC) :: I would disagree with you and ask you to ]. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of ], ], etc. as you do. So I ask nicely of you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and after you've done so, if you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- <b><font color="#996600" face="times new roman,times">]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background:#FFFF99">]</font></sup> 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
:::You need to learn that these far flung sources that no-one has ever heard of may be good enough for you- but they are simply not good enough by Misplaced Pages inclusion standards. I was please that you were apparently beginning to learn that, after all this time. Perhaps your days of offering UFOlogy journals as reliable medical sources are over? ] (]) 06:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:03, 30 July 2009

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Unneeded snarkiness

I don't appreciate your personal attacks here and here. I don't believe that these comments are helpful in anyway to our goal of good article writing. I am asking you to please refactor/remove your snarky comments per WP:TALK and specifically WP:NPA. Thank you. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

You do not understand the basics of reliable sourcing and related rules/guidelines, and this is a perennial problem in your editing. Jefffire (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
I would disagree with you and ask you to assume good faith. I've been editing here just as long as you have so you can assume that I have just as good an understanding of WP:RS, WP:V, etc. as you do. So I ask nicely of you again, please remove/refactor your personal attacks on me. It's simple enough for you to do and after you've done so, if you would then like to talk about our mutual understanding of these basic yet core policies, I am happy to engage you in a civil conversation here or at my talk page. Perhaps I do have something to learn from you (and maybe vice-versa). Thanks again. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
You need to learn that these far flung sources that no-one has ever heard of may be good enough for you- but they are simply not good enough by Misplaced Pages inclusion standards. I was please that you were apparently beginning to learn that, after all this time. Perhaps your days of offering UFOlogy journals as reliable medical sources are over? Jefffire (talk) 06:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)