Revision as of 06:50, 30 July 2009 editRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →Hurricanger← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:52, 30 July 2009 edit undoDrag-5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users678 edits →HurricangerNext edit → | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
::Stop replacing the {{tl|movereq}} tag on the page. This move is a ] violation and I hope that the community will pay attention to my statements this time around.—] (]) 06:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ::Stop replacing the {{tl|movereq}} tag on the page. This move is a ] violation and I hope that the community will pay attention to my statements this time around.—] (]) 06:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Stop requesting that the page be moved. This is getting extremely disruptive.—] (]) 06:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ::Stop requesting that the page be moved. This is getting extremely disruptive.—] (]) 06:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::MY EDIT IS NOT A VIOLATION. IT IS A NORMAL WIKIPEDIA PEROCEDURE. YOU ARE COMMITTING A ] VIOLATION. CEASE IMMEDIATELY.] (]) 06:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | == ] == |
Revision as of 06:52, 30 July 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!
|
Masked Rider Decade
Please stop disrupting the page. There is already a consensus that "Masked Rider Decade" is not the right name. Going through more and more processes does not help.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- If you are opposed to the change pease go through the proper channels.Drag-5 (talk) 03:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Your disruptions on this page are getting tiresome. You do not have consensus.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Disruption can be classified as reverting edits, blocking edits, removing other users comments and more. discussion of a matter is not disruption. it is discussion. wikipedia improves through discussion not stagnation. there is no consensus for move and there is no consensus for no move. this behaviour could be viewed as bullying. please cease your personal communication with me and concentrate on the article in question. if you think it needs to remain as kamen rider, then focus your energy on that. Drag-5 (talk) 04:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Having no consensus to move means there is a consensus not to move the page. You are the only person who has ever actually petitioned that all of the articles be renamed. This is hypocritical coming from you given your actions on other websites, but that is not a matter that should be discussed here. I've made my arguments over a dozen times in the past three days. You should stop obsessing over this and move on and continue editing the Guyver pages here.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- MY LIFE OUTSIDE OF THIS ISSUE IS NONE OF YOUR CONCERN.Drag-5 (talk) 04:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I still feel you are being hypocritical and believe that you should focus on pages you know things about.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- MY LIFE OUTSIDE OF THIS ISSUE IS NONE OF YOUR CONCERN.Drag-5 (talk) 04:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Having no consensus to move means there is a consensus not to move the page. You are the only person who has ever actually petitioned that all of the articles be renamed. This is hypocritical coming from you given your actions on other websites, but that is not a matter that should be discussed here. I've made my arguments over a dozen times in the past three days. You should stop obsessing over this and move on and continue editing the Guyver pages here.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Disruption can be classified as reverting edits, blocking edits, removing other users comments and more. discussion of a matter is not disruption. it is discussion. wikipedia improves through discussion not stagnation. there is no consensus for move and there is no consensus for no move. this behaviour could be viewed as bullying. please cease your personal communication with me and concentrate on the article in question. if you think it needs to remain as kamen rider, then focus your energy on that. Drag-5 (talk) 04:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Your disruptions on this page are getting tiresome. You do not have consensus.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hurricanger
Now you are disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point. I've removed the requested move from this page. There is no standard for Super Sentai series names, and we always go with the official romanization (not translation) of the title. This means there are articles at Denshi Sentai Denziman, Ninpuu Sentai Hurricaneger, GoGo Sentai Boukenger, and Juken Sentai Gekiranger.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- DO NOT REMOVE OTHER USERS COMMENTS. MY PAGE MOVE REQUEST WILL BE SUBJECTED TO PEER REVIEW. DO NOT INTERFER WITH NORMAL WIKIPEDIA PROCEDURES.Drag-5 (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is a definite violation of WP:POINT at this level.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Stop replacing the {{movereq}} tag on the page. This move is a WP:POINT violation and I hope that the community will pay attention to my statements this time around.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Stop requesting that the page be moved. This is getting extremely disruptive.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- MY EDIT IS NOT A VIOLATION. IT IS A NORMAL WIKIPEDIA PEROCEDURE. YOU ARE COMMITTING A WP:TPNO VIOLATION. CEASE IMMEDIATELY.Drag-5 (talk) 06:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Kamen Rider Decade
Thank you for agreeing that "only" shouldn't be on the article. However, "much less" is just as bad as "only" because "much less" is open to wide variety of opinions like "only" is. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 04:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- good point. might i suggest, "roughly 20 less than previous series" as that may be considered more neutral? Drag-5 (talk) 05:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- No. It still makes neutrality problems. I'd say we make no mention of this kind at all for neutrality reasons. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK Yes, I am agreeig with you. Drag-5 (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK Yes, I am agreeig with you. Drag-5 (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- No. It still makes neutrality problems. I'd say we make no mention of this kind at all for neutrality reasons. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
ANI
See Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Drag-5. Thanks! —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- thank you for teh heads upDrag-5 (talk) 05:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 05:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)