Revision as of 01:46, 30 September 2005 edit24ip (talk | contribs)895 editsm rv← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:00, 7 December 2005 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits →Hilarity ensuesNext edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
* ](]) says goodbye in |
* ](]) says goodbye in his own special way - (see ) | ||
* | * | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* | * | ||
== Ideas == | == Ideas == |
Revision as of 22:00, 7 December 2005
Interesting topics:
WikiPhilosophy:
Useful pages:
Items I am watching over:
- Special:Recentchangeslinked/List of collectible card games
- Category:Game stubs
- Category:Occupations
- Special:Whatlinkshere/Bad title
Other links
Hilarity ensues
What? | This section needs more cowbell. You can help by adding more cowbell. |
- Skateboarding trick
- "honk honk here comes the banmobile"
- User:Dmn(*) says goodbye in his own special way - Get A Life You Nob (see contribs from Dec 31 2004)
- It's important to warn users
- "Human should be a disambig page."
- I thought the page was using protection!
Ideas
Netoholic's Law
As a wiki discussion grows longer, the probability of an accusation by one user of another acting unilaterally approaches one.
- Look, I've made thousands of "unilateral" edits, so probably have you. It's a wiki. Get over it.
Corollary
One can substitute any of the following for "unilaterally", and the law still works -- "against consensus", "mindlessly", "carelessly". Any of these words indicates you might be facing off against a wiki-warrior.
Other wisdom
The opposite of deletionism is not inclusionism; rather, the opposite is contribution.