Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
There's only . Yes, please! ] ] 10:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
There's only . Yes, please! ] ] 10:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
:That's funny. I saw it on Consumerist.com. Someone wasn't getting any at home. '''- A'''LLST'''✰'''R<span class="Unicode" style="color:#FF72E3;">▼</span>'''<sup>]</sup>''' <sub>'''] '''</sub> 18:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
:That's funny. I saw it on Consumerist.com. Someone wasn't getting any at home. '''- A'''LLST'''✰'''R<span class="Unicode" style="color:#FF72E3;">▼</span>'''<sup>]</sup>''' <sub>'''] '''</sub> 18:33, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
==Matt Sanchez==
My ban has been removed, see my talk page. And please stop being antagonistic, it's really tedious. Matt Sanchez 22:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
ALLST✰R▼'s Misplaced Pages talk page Currently, Allstarecho's Misplaced Pages online status is: - Also add this page to your watchlist for my status updates. Currently, Allstarecho's local time and date is: 2:26 PM on December 25, 2024 - Is my clock slow? Click here to wind it up!
Hello and welcome to my talk page. Please note that I will reply to you on this page unless you request otherwise. Please watch this page if you comment.
Further, please note:
Please take note of my status and the time where I live. If I'm not online, I'll reply when I am, but feel free to look at my contact page for other methods of contact.
Please use a ==descriptive header== and sign & date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message.
Please use ] when mentioning users and pages.
I will not reply directly to attacks, innuendo or general incivility. You will be wasting your time if you're here for that. I may however reply via a warning on your own talk page or a report to the Administrators' incident noticeboard. Save your time and mine so that we can both use it to build a better Misplaced Pages.
Please note that I archive talk posts so if commenting on an old thread from the archives, consider starting a new thread.
Please note that I am a "regular". Do not template me as I will surely revert. For more info, refer to WP:DTTR.
With all that said, ask away and I'll try and help.
ALLST✰R▼'s talk page archives - click 'show' to view and/or search them ------>
Want to see how a Misplaced Pages lynching works? Read this.
Steve McNair Links
Thanks for accept my edits my Friend!!! I will search for the videos in other site, Anyway thanks for be patient with me.--Zta (talk) July 5 2009 ♠Nastia
I noticed this edit today. Please don't do that anymore. Your contributions to WP:CFB are extremely valuable, but there were two things wrong with this one:
Don't "fix" redirects that aren't broken. WP:NOTBROKEN. If ULM Warhawks football was changed from a redirect to an actual article, then we want the link to point to the new football article, not the general athletics article. Killing the redirect prevents this from happening.
{{cfb link}} is extremely useful because it will automagically link to that team's specific season page when it gets created. Your edit resulted in the Ole Miss article not linking to the newly created 2008 ULM Warhawks football team article. No telling how long the Ole Miss article would have sat around happily linking to ULM Warhawks had I not stumbled upon the change by accident and fixed it.
Keep up the good work. In the future, please don't de-template instances of {{cfb link}} unless you're pointing the link at the season-specific article. Thanks and happy editing. DeFaultRyan15:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
It was broken. I noted it as a redirect kill, and changed it, because 2008 ULM Warhawks football team was redirecting to ULM Warhawks. So I cut out the middle "man" so to speak. I killed the redirect and made it go straight to the article it was redirecting to - which as I understand is perfectly acceptable. 2008 ULM Warhawks football team wasn't created until June 28, 2009. {{cfb link}} may automagically link to that team's specific season page when it gets created but it shouldn't be used until it is created to avoid unnecessary redirects. - ALLST✰R▼ wuz here15:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
No, I fail to see how the redirect was broken. Reason #1 on why not to change redirects is "Redirects can indicate possible future articles". This applies here. If ULM Warhawks football were turned into an article, it would be a more appropriate link target than ULM Warhawks. Therefore, {{cfb link}} pointing at ULM Warhawks football (even though it redirects to ULM Warhawks) is still the correct and desired behavior. Furthermore 2008 ULM Warhawks football team has never redirected to ULM Warhawks. Perhaps you misunderstand the beharior of {{cfb link}}. It checks for the existence of the season page, then checks for the football page, then the athletics team page, then the school, and chooses the most specific existing article to link to. In April (at the time of the edit in question), the season-specific page didn't exist, so {{cfb link}} was pointing at ULM Warhawks football. This is why {{cfb link}} exists - to successively link to more specific/appropriate articles as they are created. There's no need to cut out the middle man. The behavior was correct as-is. DeFaultRyan22:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)