Misplaced Pages

Islamofascism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:33, 6 August 2009 editAnarchangel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,534 edits Neutralized the criticism, controversy and support sections, comparison with fascism to the fore, which says it all, really. there isn't a single common element in those lists← Previous edit Revision as of 19:22, 6 August 2009 edit undoBrandonYusufToropov (talk | contribs)7,035 editsm wikilinkNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


== The analogy with Fascism == == The analogy with Fascism ==
Proponents of the phrase, in particular ] and Christopher Hitchens argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islamofascism,<ref>Berman, Paul (2003). ''Terror and Liberalism''. W W Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-05775-5.</ref>{{page number}} Proponents of the phrase, in particular ] and ] argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islamofascism,<ref>Berman, Paul (2003). ''Terror and Liberalism''. W W Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-05775-5.</ref>{{page number}}


A list from various sources: A list from various sources:

Revision as of 19:22, 6 August 2009

The term Islamofascism is a neologism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements from the turn of the 21st century on, and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

The analogy with Fascism

Proponents of the phrase, in particular Paul Berman and Christopher Hitchens argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islamofascism,

A list from various sources:

  • rage against historical humiliation;
  • inspiration from what is believed to be an earlier golden age (one or more of the first few Caliphates in the case of Islamism);
  • a desire to restore the perceived glory of this age — or "a fanatical determination to get on top of history after being underfoot for so many generations" — with an all-encompassing (totalitarian) social, political, economic system;
  • belief that malicious, predatory alien forces are conspiring against and within the nation/community, and that violence is necessary to defeat and expel these forces;
  • exaltation of death and destruction along with a contempt for "art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence", and strong commitment to sexual repression and subordination of women.
  • offensive military, (or at least armed) campaign to reestablish the power and allegedly rightful international domination of the nation/community.

Historical scholars' definition of Fascism

By way of contrast, the defining principles of fascism:

  • It comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
  • It is the belief that nations and/or races are in perpetual conflict whereby only the strong can survive by being healthy, vital, and by asserting themselves in conflict against the weak.
  • It advocates the creation of a single-party state.
  • Its governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government and the fascist movement.
  • It opposes class conflict, blames capitalist liberal democracies for its creation and communists for exploiting the concept.
  • It is much defined by what it opposes, what scholars call the fascist negations - its opposition to individualism, rationalism, liberalism, conservatism and communism.
  • In the economic sphere, many fascist leaders have claimed to support a "Third Way" in economic policy, which they believed superior to both the rampant individualism of unrestrained capitalism and the severe control of state communism. This was to be achieved by establishing significant government control over business and labour (Mussolini called his nation's system "the corporate state"). No common and concise definition exists for fascism and historians and political scientists disagree on what should be in any concise definition.

Scholars of historical Fascism came to rough agreement by the 1990s as to common elements in fascist movements. The term fascist has been used as a pejorative word since the Nuremburg Trials.

Comment and controversy

Criticism

The term, "Islamofascism" has been criticized by scholars and journalists alike. It is considered historically inaccurate and simplistic by scholars of history and politics., and is criticized as being generally used as a pejorative or for propaganda purposes.

Critics such as former National Review columnist Joseph Sobran, and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman argue that "Islamofascism is nothing but an empty propaganda term." used by proponents of the "War on Terror". Security expert Daniel Benjamin, political scientist Norman Finkelstein and The American Conservative columnist Daniel Larison, highlight the claim that despite its use as a piece of propaganda the term is inherently meaningless, since as Benjamin notes, "there is no sense in which jihadists embrace fascist ideology as it was developed by Mussolini or anyone else who was associated with the term."

Cultural historian Richard Webster has argued that grouping many different political ideologies, terrorist and insurgent groups, governments, and religious sects into one single idea of "Islamofascism" may lead to an oversimplification of the phenomenon of terrorism. In a similar vein the left-wing National Security Network argues that the term dangerously obscures important distinctions and differences between groups of Islamic extremists while alienating moderate voices in the Muslim world because it "creates the perception that the United States is fighting a religious war against Islam." Daniel Larison attributes proponent Hitchen's support of the phrase to his anti-religious stance. Conservative British historian Niall Ferguson points out that this political use of what he calls a "completely misleading concept," is "just a way of making us feel that we're the 'greatest generation' fighting another World War." Reza Aslan claims the term "falls flat" when describing groups like al-Qaeda, noting that they are anti-nationalist while fascism is ultra-nationalist.

Commenting on the claimed incongruity between the "Muslim World" and "industrial state fascism," US journalist Eric Margolis claims that ironically the most totalitarian Islamic regimes, "in fact, are America's allies."

The public use of the term has also elicited a critical response from various Muslim groups. In the aftermath of the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot, George W. Bush described his policies as a battle against "Islamic fascists... will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom". The Council on American-Islamic Relations wrote to him to complain, saying that the use of the term "feeds the perception that the war on terror is actually a war on Islam". Ingrid Mattson of the Islamic Society of North America also complained about this speech, claiming that it added to a misunderstanding of Islam. Mattson did acknowledge, however, that some terrorist groups also misuse "Islamic concepts and terms to justify their violence."

The controversy surrounding this neologism is not only confined to the critical commentary of media figures, academics and Muslim groups. In 2007, the conservative writer and activist David Horowitz launched a series of lectures and protests on college campuses under the title of "Islamofascism Awareness Week.". At least 40 universities moved officially to distance themselves from the event. Several Muslims and non-Muslims on different college campuses aware of the event came out in opposition to it. The Muslim Student Group at Penn State University, for instance, said it feared "that this Islamophobic program will have hazardous consequences on the Penn State community." At least one campus "Republican" group has also gone on record to distance themselves from the event.

In April 2008, Associated Press reported that US federal agencies, including the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security, were advised to stop using the term 'Islamo-fascism' in a 14-point memo issued by the Extremist Messaging Branch, a department of another federal body known as the National Counterterrorism Center. Aimed at improving the presentation of the "War on Terrorism" before Muslim audiences and the media, the memo states: "We are communicating with, not confronting, our audiences. Don't insult or confuse them with pejorative terms such as 'Islamo-fascism,' which are considered offensive by many Muslims."

One of the world's leading authorities on fascism, Walter Laqueur, after reviewing this and related terms, concluded that "Islamic fascism, Islamophobia and antisemitism, each in its way, are imprecise terms we could well do without but it is doubtful whether they can be removed from our political lexicon."

Support

US author and Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means." Christopher Hitchens has also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Origins of "Islamofascism"

The term "Islamofascism" is included in the New Oxford American Dictionary, defining it as "a controversial term equating some modern Islamic movements with the European fascist movements of the early twentieth century".

The origins of the term are uncertain. Earlier comparisons between fascism and Islam exist, such as Edgar Alexander's comparison of Nazism with 'Mohammedanism' in 1937, and Manfred Halpern's 1963 comparison of "neo-Islamic totalitarian movements" with fascist movements.

In a 1979 debate with Michel Foucault in the pages of Le Monde over the character of the Iranian Revolution of 1979, the French Marxist historian Maxime Rodinson wrote that the Khomeini regime and organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood represented a type of "archaic fascism" ("un type de fascisme archaïque"). Albert Scardino claims that "Islamo-fascism" was coined by Muslim scholar Khalid Duran in a Washington Times piece, where "the word was meant as a criticism of hyper-traditionalist clerics". Radio talk-show host and vocal critic of radical Islam Michael Savage claims that he coined the term in one of his commentaries and that today's common use of the term sprang from his use of same. In 1990 the term was also used by Scottish historian Malise Ruthven who wrote in The Independent that, "authoritarian government, not to say Islamo-fascism, is the rule rather than the exception from Morocco to Pakistan."

The related term, Islamic fascism, was adopted by journalists including Stephen Schwartz and Christopher Hitchens, who intended it to refer to Islamist extremists, including terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, although he more often tends to use the phrases "theocratic fascism" or "fascism with an Islamic face" (a play on Susan Sontag's phrase "fascism with a human face", referring to the declaration of martial law in Poland in 1981). The terms Islamic fascism and Muslim fascism are used by the French philosopher Michel Onfray, an outspoken atheist and antireligionist, who notes in his Atheist Manifesto that Ruhollah Khomeini's Islamic Revolution "gave birth to an authentic Muslim fascism".

Examples of use

  • "It is right for us to be on the offense against Islamofascism, and not wait until they attack us on our soil. Unlike any war we have ever fought in this nation, this is not a war for soil. It is a war for our soul. We will either win it or we will lose it. This nation must rally to the point where we recognize there is no compromise. There is no alternative. We must win; they must lose. Islamofascism must disappear from the face of the earth, or we will." — Mike Huckabee
  • "What we have to understand is ... this is not really a war against terrorism, this is not really a war against al Qaeda, this is a war against movements and ideologies that are jihadist, that are Islamofascists, that aim to destroy the Western world." — Clifford May
  • " attacks serve a clear and focused ideology, a set of beliefs and goals that are evil, but not insane. Some call this evil Islamic radicalism; others, militant Jihadism; still others, Islamo-fascism. Whatever it's called, this ideology is very different from the religion of Islam. This form of radicalism exploits Islam to serve a violent, political vision: the establishment, by terrorism and subversion and insurgency, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom." — George W. Bush


See also

References

  1. Berman, Paul (2003). Terror and Liberalism. W W Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-05775-5.
  2. ^ Wright, Lawrence, Looming Tower, Knopf 2006, p.306
  3. Manfred Halpern, Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa. Princeton University Press, 1963 quoted in
  4. ^ Hitchens, Christopher: Defending Islamofascism: It's a valid term. Here's why, Slate, 2007-10-22 Cite error: The named reference "CH1022" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ Schwartz, Stephen. "What Is 'Islamofascism'?". TCS Daily. Retrieved 2006-09-14.
  6. Girvin, Brian. The Right in the Twentieth Century. Pinter, 1994. Pp. 83. Describes fascism as an "anti-liberal radical authoritarian nationalist movement".
  7. Turner, Henry Ashby. Reappraisals of Fascism. New Viewpoints, 1975. Pp. 162. States fascism's "goals of radical and authoritarian nationalism".
  8. Payne, Stanley. Fascism in Spain, 1923-1977. Univ of Wisconsin Press, 1992. Pp. 43. Payne describes Spanish fascist José Antonio Primo de Rivera's objectives, saying "Young José Antonio's primary political passion was and would long remain the vindication of his father's work, which he was now trying to conceptualize in a radical, authoritarian nationalist form."
  9. Larsen, Stein Ugelvik; Hagtvet, Bernt; Myklebust, Jan Petter. Who were the Fascists: social roots of European Fascism. Pp. 424. This reference calls fascism an "organized form of integrative radical nationalist authoritarianism".
  10. E.g. Noel O'Sullivan's five major themes of fascism are: corporatism, revolution, the leader principle, messianic faith, and autarky. The Fascism Reader by Aristotle A. Kallis says, "1. Corporatism. The most important claim made by fascism was that it alone could offer the creative prospect of a 'third way' between capitalism and socialism. Hitler, in Mein Kampf, spoke enthusiastically about the 'National Socialist corporative idea' as one which would eventually 'take the place of ruinous class warfare'; whilst Mussolini, in typically extravagant fashion, declared that 'the Corporative System is destined to become the civilization of the twentieth century.'"
  11. Hawkins, Mike. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860-1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. p. 285. "Conflict is in fact the basic law of life in all social organisms, as it is of all biological ones; societies are formed, gain strength, and move forwards through conflict; the healthiest and most vital of them assert themselves against the weakest and less well adapted through conflict; the natural evolution of nations and races takes place through conflict." Alfredo Rocco, Italian Fascist theorist and government minister.
  12. De Grand, Alexander. Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany: the "fascist" style of rule. Routledge, 2004. Pp. 28.
  13. Kent, Allen; Lancour, Harold; Nasri, William Z. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Volume 62 - Supplement 25 - Automated Discourse Generation to the User-Centered Revolution: 1970-1995. CRC Press, 1998. ISBN 0824720628, 9780824720629. p. 69.
  14. Welch, David. Modern European History, 1871-2000. p. 57. (Speaks of fascism opposing capitalism for creating class conflict and communism for exploiting class conflict).
  15. "Fascism." The Blackwell Dictionary of Sociology. Editor Allan G. Johnson. Wiley-Blackwell, 2000. p. 119
  16. Heywood , Andrew Key concepts in politics, p. 57, Palgrave Macmillan 2000
  17. Peter Davies, Derek Lynch. The Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right. Routledge, 2002. p. 146
  18. Heywood, Andrew. Key Concepts in Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. p. 78
  19. Rao, B. V. History of Modern Europe Ad 1789-2002. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd, 2006. p. 215
  20. E.g. Noel O'Sullivan's five major themes of fascism are: corporatism, revolution, the leader principle, messianic faith, and autarky. The Fascism Reader by Aristotle A. Kallis says, "1. Corporatism. The most important claim made by fascism was that it alone could offer the creative prospect of a 'third way' between capitalism and socialism. Hitler, in Mein Kampf, spoke enthusiastically about the 'National Socialist corporative idea' as one which would eventually 'take the place of ruinous class warfare'; whilst Mussolini, in typically extravagant fashion, declared that 'the Corporative System is destined to become the civilization of the twentieth century.'"
  21. http://books.google.com/bookshl=en&lr=&id=IKn2y2yS014C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=corporatism+fascism&ots=6D7mtY4n2r&sig=qYEFO4vn5ojaN1-fv8zhbnITnU8#PPA7,M1
  22. Gregor, Mussolini's Intellectuals: Fascist Social and Political Thought, Princeton University Press, 2005 ISBN 0691120099 282 pages, page 4
  23. ^ "Niall Ferguson Interview: Conversations with History)". Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley. 2006. Retrieved 2007-10-12. "…what we see at the moment is an attempt to interpret our present predicament in a rather caricatured World War II idiom. I mean, “Islamofascism” illustrates the point well, because it’s a completely misleading concept. In fact, there’s virtually no overlap between the ideology of al Qaeda and fascism. It’s just a way of making us feel that we’re the “greatest generation” fighting another World War, like the war our fathers and grandfathers fought. You’re translating a crisis symbolized by 9/11 into a sort of pseudo World War II. So, 9/11 becomes Pearl Harbor and then you go after the bad guys who are the fascists, and if you don’t support us, then you must be an appeaser."
  24. Angelo Codevilla. Advice to War Presidents. Public Affairs. p. 25."...the term "Islamofascism," used to describe strongly anti-Western movements in the Muslim world, betrays ignorance of those movements as well as of Islam and Fascism."}}
  25. ^ Sobran, Joe. "Words in Wartime". Retrieved 2006-04-18. "Islamofascism is nothing but an empty propaganda term. And wartime propaganda is usually, if not always, crafted to produce hysteria, the destruction of any sense of proportion. Such words, undefined and unmeasured, are used by people more interested in making us lose our heads than in keeping their own."
  26. Richard Alan Nelson (1996 url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ySwYAAAAIAAJ&q=A+Chronology+and+Glossary+of+Propaganda+in+the+United+States&dq=A+Chronology+and+Glossary+of+Propaganda+in+the+United+States). A Chronology and Glossary of Propaganda in the United States. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); External link in |date= (help); Missing pipe in: |date= (help) "Propaganda is neutrally defined as a systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of specified target audiences for ideological, political or commercial purposes through the controlled transmission of one-sided messages (which may or may not be factual) via mass and direct media channels. A propaganda organization employs propagandists who engage in propagandism—the applied creation and distribution of such forms of persuasion."
  27. Rall, Ted. "Bush's war on history and to…toma…tomatotarianism". Retrieved 2007-07-28.
  28. Paul Krugman. "Fearing Fear Itself". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-10-29. "...there isn’t actually any such thing as Islamofascism — it’s not an ideology; it’s a figment of the neocon imagination. The term came into vogue only because it was a way for Iraq hawks to gloss over the awkward transition from pursuing Osama bin Laden, who attacked America, to Saddam Hussein, who didn’t."
  29. ^ Richard Allen Greene (12 August 2006). "Bush's language angers US Muslims". Retrieved 2007-06-28.
  30. Wajahat Ali, 'An Interview with Norman Finkelstein' "'Islamo-fascism' is a meaningless term. If I am not mistaken, it was coined by the commentator Christopher Hitchens. The term is a throwback to when juvenile leftists, myself among them, labeled everyone we disagreed with a 'fascist pig.' So this is a kosher-halal version of that epithet. Fascism used to refer to a fairly precise historical phenomenon, although it's even doubtful that the term accurately encompasses regimes as different as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany. But when you start using the term to characterize terrorist bands who want to turn the clock back several centuries and resurrect the Caliphate, it is simply a vacuous epithet like 'Evil Empire,' 'Axis of Evil' and the rest.
  31. Richard Webster. "Israel, Palestine and the tiger of terrorism: anti-semitism and history". New Statesman. Retrieved 2007-06-28. "The idea that there is some kind of autonomous "Islamofascism" that can be crushed, or that the west may defend itself against the terrorists who threaten it by cultivating that eagerness to kill militant Muslims which Christopher Hitchens urges upon us, is a dangerous delusion. The symptoms that have led some to apply the label of "Islamofascism" are not reasons to forget root causes. They are reasons for us to examine even more carefully what those root causes actually are."
  32. Report: 'Islamofascism' blinds U.S. "(Islamofascism) creates the perception that the United States is fighting a religious war against Islam, thus alienating moderate voices in the region who would be willing to work with America towards common goals."
  33. Larison, Daniel. "Term Limits". Retrieved 2008-03-13. "The word “Islamofascism” never had any meaning, except as a catch-all for whatever regimes and groups the word’s users wished to make targets for military action. Hitchens is also well known for his tendentious misunderstandings of all forms of religion, likening theism to a supernatural totalitarian regime and attributing all of the crimes of political totalitarianism to religion. It was therefore appropriate that he should promote the term “Islamofascism” since it defines a religious movement in the language of secular totalitarianism."
  34. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ew9SDNUHm_M&feature=related
  35. Eric Margolis (2006). "The Big Lie About 'Islamic Fascism'". Retrieved 2007-07-28. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) "There is nothing in any part of the Muslim World that resembles the corporate fascist states of western history. In fact, clan and tribal-based traditional Islamic society, with its fragmented power structures, local loyalties, and consensus decision-making, is about as far as possible from western industrial state fascism. The Muslim World is replete with brutal dictatorships, feudal monarchies, and corrupt military-run states, but none of these regimes, however deplorable, fits the standard definition of fascism. Most, in fact, are America’s allies."
  36. "U.S. Muslim group's head says Bush's term 'Islamic fascism' adds to misunderstanding of Islam". The Associated Press. September 1, 2006. Retrieved 2007-06-28.
  37. 'Islamo-Fascism Week' Stokes Debate
  38. U. disavows ties to Horowitz's program
  39. The BC Heights (2007). "Controversial 'awareness week' draws criticism: 'Islamofascism' gets mixed reponses". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  40. The Daily Cardinal (2007). "Diversity forum tackles advocacy issues". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  41. The Daily Californian (2007). "Republican Group's Event Plans Under Fire". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  42. The Dartmouth (2007). "'Islamo-fascism' speaker met with controversy". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  43. The Daily Bruin (2007). "Week's focus stirring controversy: Bruin Republicans' "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" met with criticism from Muslim students". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); line feed character in |title= at position 35 (help)
  44. Esther Kaplan, The Nation (2007). "The Culture War Descends on Columbia". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  45. Muslim Student Association's Response to Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week (IFAW)
  46. Harvard Crimson (2007). "'Islamo Fascism' Week Fails To Gain Traction". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  47. "'Jihadist' booted from US government lexicon". Associated Press. April 25 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-25. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  48. ^
  49. William Safire: Islamofascism, The New York Times, October 1, 2006
  50. Christopher Hitchens (2007). "Defending Islamofascism. It's a valid term. Here's why". Retrieved 2008-03-13. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  51. A Fury For God, Malise Ruthven, Granta, 2002, p.207-8
  52. The New Oxford American Dictionary, Second Edition, Erin McKean (Editor), 2096 pages, May 2005, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-517077-6
  53. Edgar Alexander, Der Mythus Hitler, Europa-Verlag Zurich 1937. See
  54. Manfred Halpern. The Politics of Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa. Princeton University Press, 1963. See Chapter 8, "Resurrecting the Past: Neo-Islamic Totalitarianism."
  55. Scardino, Albert. "1-0 in the propaganda war". The Guardian. Retrieved 2006-04-19. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |origdate= ignored (|orig-date= suggested) (help)
  56. "Construing Islam as a language", by Malise Ruthven, The Independent, September 8, 1990 "Nevertheless there is what might be called a political problem affecting the Muslim world. In contrast to the heirs of some other non-Western traditions, including Hinduism, Shintoism and Buddhism, Islamic societies seem to have found it particularly hard to institutionalise divergences politically: authoritarian government, not to say Islamo-fascism, is the rule rather than the exception from Morocco to Pakistan."
  57. William Safire (2006). "Islamofascism Anyone?" International Herald Tribune, Opinion-Editorial. Retrieved August 28, 2007
  58. Michel Onfray: Atheist manifesto. The case against Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Carlton, Vic. 2007, pp. 206-213.
  59. Mike Huckabee. "Speeches to 2008 Conservative Political Action Conference". Retrieved 2008-03-13.
  60. Clifford May (October 12, 2004). "News from CNN with Wolf Blitzer". CNN News Transcript. Retrieved 2007-06-28.
  61. "President Discusses War on Terror at National Endowment for Democracy". Retrieved 2006-04-19. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |origdate= ignored (|orig-date= suggested) (help)

External links

Further reading

Islam topics
Outline of Islam
Beliefs
Five Pillars
Religious texts
Denominations
Economics
Hygiene
Other aspects
 Islamic studies
Arts
Medieval science
Philosophy
Other areas
 Other
Other religions
Apostasy
Related topics
Categories: