|
Absolutely '''do not''' approach my talk page again or leave a canned template regarding '''anything''' on that page. There is absolutely no valid reason for your having left a template regarding ownership of ] and efforts to keep this article within guidelines and policies have been explained to you. Let's just look at the rationale behind the edits in your examples of reverting to my "own previous revision" was because the editor changed wording to imply Dillinger was innocent; removed improper formatting and use of dashes plus added content that implies is sourced from a reference which does not support it; and were to change back to a previous version due to content changes that were not sourced in anyway; was because article facts were changed without the addition of sourcing to allow verification or fact checking; and finally which removed the duplication of an entry '''right above''' the one I removed. There was nothing improper, ownership based, or invalid about those reversions and it is harassment to template me and make such a claim. If you have an issue with my editing, then take it to ]. Your behavior in regard to me borders on ] and will not be tolerated. There is nothing which approaches edit warring or ownership in those reverts, but, as has been explained to you more than once, is routine article maintenance and vandal patrol in removing improper content. There's a huge difference, Skippy, learn it. As a matter of fact, go to any high profile article and look at the history and you will find that vandalism patrols constantly have to perform such reverts. Take a minute to plaster edit war templates on their pages and then we'll open a request for comments about your tenditiousness regarding such issues. I've had it with you and won't tolerate it anymore. Again, '''do not post to my talk page again.''' ] (]) 21:41, 9 August 2009 (UTC) |
|