Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rlevse: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:42, 4 December 2005 view sourceTUF-KAT (talk | contribs)48,707 edits →Merit badges← Previous edit Revision as of 21:29, 10 December 2005 view source JiFish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,934 edits Aritcle Size and SearchNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
Thanks for the correction! I'm glad somebody double-checked me on that. I think an article on ] would be interesting (I didn't know people collected merit badges), but merging the list would be a bad idea. The list is plenty long to stand alone, and I think it's useful as a separate entity. ] 05:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC) Thanks for the correction! I'm glad somebody double-checked me on that. I think an article on ] would be interesting (I didn't know people collected merit badges), but merging the list would be a bad idea. The list is plenty long to stand alone, and I think it's useful as a separate entity. ] 05:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
:I've put some notes at ]. Overall, it's a great start! The images are especially well-done, I think. ] 06:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC) :I've put some notes at ]. Overall, it's a great start! The images are especially well-done, I think. ] 06:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

== Aritcle Size and Search ==
The reason it is not showing up on the search is probably because it is very new. Give it a few more days. I used a bit of external software to count it for you. I make the wikicode 25,891 ]. The HTML document will probably be somewhat bigger. I looks featured quality to me. Good luck with that. :) --](<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 21:29, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:29, 10 December 2005

TALK Section

Welcome!

Hello Rlevse, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --JiFish(/Contrib) 15:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

You might want to put this on your user page instead. --JiFish(/Contrib) 17:28, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Yvonne Wanrow

Thank you for your comment on the article. Indeed, the justices ruling in the case did find that her gender and ethnicity were factors in her reception of an unfair trial. For more information about why, you can follow the external links or check out the texts used as references from your local library. If you feel that the article is written from a certain point of view, feel free to point out how and why on the talk page, and then to improve it yourself. I also welcome criticisms on my talkpage.--Rockero420 04:29, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

User page/talk page

Hello again Rlevse. There seems to be some confusion about what goes on a person's user page and what goes on their talk page. Generally, Wikipedians use their user pages to describe themselves, their interests, and to gloat about their contributions. Of course, they are free to use the namespace anyway they see fit (within certain limits). A person's talk page, on the other hand, is generally used by members of the community other than the user him/herself to ask questions, make comments, ask for advice, request arbitration, et cetera. In line with this standard, I have moved your comment on the Yvonne Wanrow article from my user page to my talk page. You may want to split up the content on your talk page between your talk and user pages, but of course that is your prerogative. Just a friendly FYI.--Rockero420 18:36, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Merit badges

Thanks for the correction! I'm glad somebody double-checked me on that. I think an article on Merit Badge Collecting would be interesting (I didn't know people collected merit badges), but merging the list would be a bad idea. The list is plenty long to stand alone, and I think it's useful as a separate entity. Tuf-Kat 05:57, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

I've put some notes at Talk:Merit Badge Collecting. Overall, it's a great start! The images are especially well-done, I think. Tuf-Kat 06:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Aritcle Size and Search

The reason it is not showing up on the search is probably because it is very new. Give it a few more days. I used a bit of external software to count it for you. I make the wikicode 25,891 bytes. The HTML document will probably be somewhat bigger. I looks featured quality to me. Good luck with that. :) --JiFish(/Contrib) 21:29, 10 December 2005 (UTC)