Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pytom: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:18, 22 August 2009 editNoroton (talk | contribs)37,252 edits Please take a look at this: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 16:10, 23 August 2009 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:Pytom/Archives.Next edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan

== New straw poll ==

You are a user who responded to ]. As someone interested in the discussion a ''']''' has been laid out to see where we currently stand with regards to building a consensus. For the sake of clarity, please indicate your support or opposition (or neutrality) to each section, but leave discussion to the end of each section. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span>&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 23:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

== Final version ==

As a contributor to ], I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. <span style="background-color: maroon; color: white">]</span>&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 21:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


== Formal Mediation for Sports Logos == == Formal Mediation for Sports Logos ==
Line 29: Line 21:




==Request for mediation not accepted== == Request for mediation not accepted ==

{| class="messagebox" style="width:90%" {| class="messagebox" style="width:90%"
|- |-

Revision as of 16:10, 23 August 2009

Sections of this page older than 31 days are automatically archived.

AfD nomination of Global Virtual Aviation Community‎

An article that you have been involved in editing, Global Virtual Aviation Community‎, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Global Virtual Aviation Community‎. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Collectonian and Lord S are AfD'ing an article from DBZ again

They didn't even notify the talk page where consensus was just reached, this really is reprehensible. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tien_Shinhan#Tien_Shinhan

Formal Mediation for Sports Logos

As a contributor to Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/RFC_on_use_of_sports_team_logos, you have been included in a request for formal mediation regarding the subject at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Use of Sports Logos. With your input and agreement to work through mediation, it is hoped we can achieve a lasting solution. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Use of Sports Logos.
For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 02:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Please take a look at this

Responding to several comments over at the NOT talk page, based on the idea of "unencyclopedic" content, I put up a new section, Misplaced Pages talk:What Misplaced Pages is not#The reason why the "unencyclopedic" argument just doesn't fly on that talk page. I just noticed that your comment on that page makes the same point (mine is a bit more detailed, maybe too detailed). Much of the "unencyclopedic" argument is a pet peeve of mine. That was a brilliant point you made, by the way. Thanks, Noroton (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)