| Revision as of 10:10, 12 December 2005 editRobert I (talk | contribs)719 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:51, 12 December 2005 edit undoFys (talk | contribs)14,706 edits POV issuesNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I have followed CJCurrie here. The above is a factual statement. its not a question of whether Mr.Currie likes it. Its a question of whether it is true, or not. Just how does he get away with these comments? ] 10:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | I have followed CJCurrie here. The above is a factual statement. its not a question of whether Mr.Currie likes it. Its a question of whether it is true, or not. Just how does he get away with these comments? ] 10:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :The first sentence quoted is not strictly NPOV. ] | ] 20:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:51, 12 December 2005
He was one of those hereditary peers expelled from the Upper House by the Blair Labour government. The Lord Sudeley has been active in the Monday Club, a traditional conservative group since the 1960s.
- This is one of several skewed edits written by the same editor or editors. See also Western Goals Institute for more information. CJCurrie 02:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
I have followed CJCurrie here. The above is a factual statement. its not a question of whether Mr.Currie likes it. Its a question of whether it is true, or not. Just how does he get away with these comments? Robert I 10:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- The first sentence quoted is not strictly NPOV. David | Talk 20:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)