| Revision as of 17:10, 31 August 2009 editN5iln (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,885 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:19, 31 August 2009 edit undoN5iln (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,885 edits →August 2009Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| :Corrected (moving too fast) -] (]) 17:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC) | :Corrected (moving too fast) -] (]) 17:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''"Teabagger" is being used as a pejorative, and as such violates WP:NPOV. Do not attempt to include it again. ] (]) 17:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)'' ] (]) 17:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''"Teabagger" is being used as a pejorative, and as such violates WP:NPOV. Do not attempt to include it again. Both that page and its companion page ahve been nominated for semi-protection against editing, which precludes edits by anonymous users.] (]) 17:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)'' ] (]) 17:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | ||
Revision as of 17:19, 31 August 2009
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:17:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC) N5iln (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
 | Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history. |
3RR warning
Please be aware of the WP:3RR policy. You will be blocked if you continue to revert against consensus. OhNoitsJamie 22:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's news to me that "edits against consensus" are covered. (I was about to protest on that basis.) -65.246.126.130 (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- You are dangerously close to running afoul of 3RR, yet again. I strongly advise you to stop. Shereth 18:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's not my intention to revert a consensus (as I see, now, that is against 3RR) but to help build a new one. -65.246.126.130 (talk) 18:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Health care reform debate in the United States has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoyadds 17:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Corrected (moving too fast) -65.246.126.130 (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. "Teabagger" is being used as a pejorative, and as such violates WP:NPOV. Do not attempt to include it again. Both that page and its companion page ahve been nominated for semi-protection against editing, which precludes edits by anonymous users.Alan (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Alan (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.