| Revision as of 00:14, 13 December 2005 editGlenn Willen (talk | contribs)269 edits discussion of recent controversial edits by several parties | Revision as of 00:39, 13 December 2005 edit undoFreestylefrappe (talk | contribs)4,471 edits you're lies are amusing...but quite see-throughNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Freestylefrappe, I'm going to have to ask that you stop removing content from that article without consensus. It wasn't acceptable when Bitola did it, and it's not acceptable when you do it either. If you have a problem with legitimate, good faith edits, please discuss on the talk page -- don't just pretend that calling it "nonsense" makes it OK to remove. I'm going to reinstate the relevant content exactly once. I assume you will then revert it, but I hope that I can get you to engage in constructive dialogue on the article's talk page instead. Thanks, ] (]) 00:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | Freestylefrappe, I'm going to have to ask that you stop removing content from that article without consensus. It wasn't acceptable when Bitola did it, and it's not acceptable when you do it either. If you have a problem with legitimate, good faith edits, please discuss on the talk page -- don't just pretend that calling it "nonsense" makes it OK to remove. I'm going to reinstate the relevant content exactly once. I assume you will then revert it, but I hope that I can get you to engage in constructive dialogue on the article's talk page instead. Thanks, ] (]) 00:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Bitola...you're BS amuses me. ] 00:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:39, 13 December 2005
Freestylefrappe, I'm going to have to ask that you stop removing content from that article without consensus. It wasn't acceptable when Bitola did it, and it's not acceptable when you do it either. If you have a problem with legitimate, good faith edits, please discuss on the talk page -- don't just pretend that calling it "nonsense" makes it OK to remove. I'm going to reinstate the relevant content exactly once. I assume you will then revert it, but I hope that I can get you to engage in constructive dialogue on the article's talk page instead. Thanks, Glenn Willen (Talk) 00:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
- Bitola...you're BS amuses me. freestylefrappe 00:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)