Revision as of 05:43, 13 December 2005 edit65.122.236.133 (talk) Cultural Context is valid← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:51, 13 December 2005 edit undo65.122.236.133 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please refer to ]. I'm sure that not everyone in this town shares your point of view. ] 05:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | Please refer to ]. I'm sure that not everyone in this town shares your point of view. ] 05:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
The fact that not everyone agrees with certain information does not invalidate that information. In addition, the cultural context added provides far more useful information about Big Spring, than census data |
The fact that not everyone agrees with certain information does not invalidate that information. In addition, the cultural context added provides far more useful information about Big Spring, than census data, geographical coordinates and the fact that a 35 year old movie was filmed there. |
Revision as of 05:51, 13 December 2005
The cultural context information is valid, if unpleasant, as anyone who has visited Big Spring can attest and was not added with the intent of "vandalism" but rather of including a factual description of Big Spring that may differ from that of the local Chamber of Commerce.
Please refer to WP:NPOV. I'm sure that not everyone in this town shares your point of view. Jasmol 05:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
The fact that not everyone agrees with certain information does not invalidate that information. In addition, the cultural context added provides far more useful information about Big Spring, than census data, geographical coordinates and the fact that a 35 year old movie was filmed there.