| Revision as of 21:56, 15 November 2006 editNsamuel (talk | contribs)111 edits →What is Misplaced Pages's policy on journalistic integrity?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:45, 3 September 2009 edit undoDaveApter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,808 edits →Accusation against you: new section | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| It is my understanding that when it is in question whether an article or tape is under legal scrutiny, it loses it's "reliable source" label. | It is my understanding that when it is in question whether an article or tape is under legal scrutiny, it loses it's "reliable source" label. | ||
| == Accusation against you == | |||
| Hi Nsamuel | |||
| Are you still active in wikiepedia? - and if so are you aware of this accusation against you: | |||
| ] even though you don't seem to have edited since 2007, and only did a handful of edits on Landmark related topics anyway. ] (]) 14:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 3 September 2009
Welcome!
Hello, Nsamuel, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ,
What is Misplaced Pages's policy on journalistic integrity?
Do you have a reference on this? I would like to strike Smeelgova's additions on these grounds.
Sm1969 00:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi. The following is available on one of their info pages, and it may relate...
The policy:
Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. The obligation to provide a reliable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.
It is my understanding that when it is in question whether an article or tape is under legal scrutiny, it loses it's "reliable source" label.
Accusation against you
Hi Nsamuel
Are you still active in wikiepedia? - and if so are you aware of this accusation against you: even though you don't seem to have edited since 2007, and only did a handful of edits on Landmark related topics anyway. DaveApter (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)