Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/VoteToImpeach: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:57, 3 September 2009 editSoxwon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,494 edits →VoteToImpeach← Previous edit Revision as of 18:06, 3 September 2009 edit undoJusdafax (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers101,877 edits →VoteToImpeach: Keep article, Soxwon is indulging in agenda-driven editing by asking it be deleted.Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
:::I have to question ]'s motives for deletion, in light of the information on his user page stating: "I'm a right-wing capitalist, and for the most part conservative." Is this proposed deletion politically motivated?] (]) 14:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC) :::I have to question ]'s motives for deletion, in light of the information on his user page stating: "I'm a right-wing capitalist, and for the most part conservative." Is this proposed deletion politically motivated?] (]) 14:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
::::So the fact that I'm open about which way I lean makes my opinion questionable? Everyone on here is biased in some way, we all try to work to control it. So in answer to your question, no, it's not, and thanks for ]. ] (]) 15:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC) ::::So the fact that I'm open about which way I lean makes my opinion questionable? Everyone on here is biased in some way, we all try to work to control it. So in answer to your question, no, it's not, and thanks for ]. ] (]) 15:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
'''Keep.''' Soxwon is an interesting case; he asks for an assumption of good faith ''while asking for defacto censorship by deleting this article!'' This is like slapping someone, and then saying "you have to assume good faith" despite your acts! All the while, he proudly proclaims that he is "conservative" on his page. Guess that explains his interest in removing this page, as well as some of his edits (in my opinion) over at ]. No doubt the article can be improved and updated, but deleting it removes historical fact from Misplaced Pages. As a precedent-setting test case alone, this is important in the Misplaced Pages world.

To me, this deletion request is as clear-cut a case of agenda-driven editing as I have seen in nearly two years as an editor. ] (]) 18:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 04:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 04:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 05:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- ] ] 05:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 18:06, 3 September 2009

VoteToImpeach

VoteToImpeach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political website, sole reference is site itself Soxwon (talk) 06:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

A link to this article appears in the Ramsey Clark article. I requested a redirect to this article for searches on "indictbushnow.org" which is a current campaign to indict President Bush for war crimes and violating the Constitution. I donated money to this cause, but had difficulty finding out who these people were.114.161.253.11 (talk) 13:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I have to question Soxwon's motives for deletion, in light of the information on his user page stating: "I'm a right-wing capitalist, and for the most part conservative." Is this proposed deletion politically motivated?114.161.253.11 (talk) 14:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
So the fact that I'm open about which way I lean makes my opinion questionable? Everyone on here is biased in some way, we all try to work to control it. So in answer to your question, no, it's not, and thanks for WP:AGF. Soxwon (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Keep. Soxwon is an interesting case; he asks for an assumption of good faith while asking for defacto censorship by deleting this article! This is like slapping someone, and then saying "you have to assume good faith" despite your acts! All the while, he proudly proclaims that he is "conservative" on his page. Guess that explains his interest in removing this page, as well as some of his edits (in my opinion) over at Karl Rove. No doubt the article can be improved and updated, but deleting it removes historical fact from Misplaced Pages. As a precedent-setting test case alone, this is important in the Misplaced Pages world.

To me, this deletion request is as clear-cut a case of agenda-driven editing as I have seen in nearly two years as an editor. Jusdafax (talk) 18:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories: