Misplaced Pages

Talk:Kalinga War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:58, 4 July 2008 editAmartyabag (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,266 editsm Tagging for WP:INDIA and its workgroup Orissa. (Plugin++) using AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 08:35, 4 September 2009 edit undoMohammad adil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,082 edits →strength..........: new sectionNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
== ] Banner/Orissa Addition == == ] Banner/Orissa Addition ==
Note: {{tl|WP India}} Project Banner with ] parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under ] or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- ] ] 02:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Note: {{tl|WP India}} Project Banner with ] parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under ] or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- ] ] 02:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

== strength.......... ==

600,000 infantry ???? are you serious ?
were they logistically capable to concentrate 600,000 men ? after u dont just gather men for fighting u have to feed them as well ! and sustaining 600,000 standing army is seriously a blind trust on primary sources, that were famous for exaggerations.
so is there any one to take notice of it ? or u guys happy with fantacy size of kalinga troops !

keep in mind that before 13th century A.D concentrating troops more then 150,000 was logistically impossible, although any nation could posses a lot more "fighting people" but to concentrate them and organize them as an army was a totally different task.
]] 08:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:35, 4 September 2009

WikiProject iconIndia: Odisha / History Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Odisha.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / Indian / South Asia Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
/ 
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Indian military history task force
Taskforce icon
South Asian military history task force

WP:INDIA Banner/Orissa Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag 02:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

strength..........

600,000 infantry ???? are you serious ? were they logistically capable to concentrate 600,000 men ? after u dont just gather men for fighting u have to feed them as well ! and sustaining 600,000 standing army is seriously a blind trust on primary sources, that were famous for exaggerations. so is there any one to take notice of it ? or u guys happy with fantacy size of kalinga troops !

keep in mind that before 13th century A.D concentrating troops more then 150,000 was logistically impossible, although any nation could posses a lot more "fighting people" but to concentrate them and organize them as an army was a totally different task. الله أكبرMohammad Adil 08:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories: