Misplaced Pages

:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:27, 6 September 2009 editHBC AIV helperbot3 (talk | contribs)140,330 editsm 1 IP & 2 users left. rm 204.145.108.46 (blocked by Mentifisto (AO ACB)).← Previous edit Revision as of 17:47, 6 September 2009 edit undo69.213.86.67 (talk) User-reportedNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
* {{Vandal|Silver7too}} disruptive editing ] (]) 16:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC) * {{Vandal|Silver7too}} disruptive editing ] (]) 16:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
:{{AIV|nv}} While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ]), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism ''only''. Cheers, ''''']''''''<sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC) :{{AIV|nv}} While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ]), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism ''only''. Cheers, ''''']''''''<sup><small>]</sup></small> 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

* {{Vandal|Tranquillity Base}} On ] user has been citing numerous reasons to remove the word "eco-terrosim" from the article. As a stated supporter, at first the edits seemed good faith however ill-conceived. After other users demonstrating proper citations, following WP:Terrorist guidelines and multiple users explaining the situation it appears that the user is now attempting simply to maintain a positive web prescence for the organization. --] (]) 17:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:47, 6 September 2009

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 06:14 on 26 December 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
    Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.



    Alerts

    Bot-reported


    User-reported

    To be fair, I think he was annoyed by my deletion of what was clearly a good-faith article, although it was definitely speediable as posted. I would be happy to stand back and see what else happens before applying sanctions. This comment is in no way meant to be a criticism of the nominating editor. --Anthony.bradbury 15:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. While they may be disruptive (consider taking this to ANI), AIV is for clear-cut cases of vandalism only. Cheers, I' 17:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
    Categories: