Revision as of 00:27, 7 September 2009 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 editsm →!vote at AFD← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:41, 7 September 2009 edit undoOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators260,845 edits replyNext edit → | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Any particular reason why you !voted to "Keep" , simply agreeing with an obvious sockpuppet of the creator (essentially agreeing that you've heard of a non-existent album)? <b>] ]</b> 19:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | Any particular reason why you !voted to "Keep" , simply agreeing with an obvious sockpuppet of the creator (essentially agreeing that you've heard of a non-existent album)? <b>] ]</b> 19:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I was duped! Are you sure Boxcar was a sockpuppet? - ] (]) 00:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | :I was duped! Are you sure Boxcar was a sockpuppet? - ] (]) 00:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: "I've heard of it" isn't exactly the most convincing reason for keep from an account with no other contributions. And yes, Checkuser confirmed the link. I might send a few other accounts to checkuser regarding the matter, come to think of it. <b>] ]</b> 00:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:41, 7 September 2009
Please do start a new topic, but remember to:
|
Enjoy
- Enjoy
- Open Season's Elliot
Ref
They are important!
A citation is a line of text that uniquely identifies a source. For example:
MLA style
APA style
- Ritter, R. (2002). The Oxford Style Manual. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-860564-1.
It allows a reader to find the source and verify that it supports material in Misplaced Pages.
Cloudbuster: Keep or redirect and merge?
The 2nd Articles for deletion discussion for Cloudbuster closed as "keep," with the note that "any merge/redirect discussions should take place at the relevant talk pages". However, the article was immediately merged and redirected into Orgone energy. The editor who participated in the discussion and then performed the merge believes that the merge/redirect is supported by consensus. I am posting this notice to the talk page of each of the editors who participated in the discussion, including the nominator, to ensure that this is the case. -- Shunpiker (talk) 18:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- - Thanks - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Tine_2.0
Re your not vote on this AfD, I've asked why you think notability is established, as if it is then I'll change my !vote - as that is my main concern (advertising can be cleaned up). I hope you don't think this is badgering of any kind. Thanks, Verbal chat 08:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- I read the comments and thought it was notable - Ret.Prof (talk) 19:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
List of fictional deer
I know it's somewhat silly, but I thought you might be interested to see what I've done with the article "List of fictional deer", which you helped to save from "nominated for deletion". Ironically, I had nothing to do with the article until then. I hope you enjoy it. --AuthorityTam (talk) 20:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I did enjoy it. - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Network television schedules
Hi Ret. Prof,
Your input at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Per_station_television_schedules would be greatly appreciated. Firsfron of Ronchester 14:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- No problem - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
!vote at AFD
Any particular reason why you !voted to "Keep" this article, simply agreeing with an obvious sockpuppet of the creator (essentially agreeing that you've heard of a non-existent album)? OhNoitsJamie 19:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- I was duped! Are you sure Boxcar was a sockpuppet? - Ret.Prof (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- "I've heard of it" isn't exactly the most convincing reason for keep from an account with no other contributions. And yes, Checkuser confirmed the link. I might send a few other accounts to checkuser regarding the matter, come to think of it. OhNoitsJamie 00:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)