Misplaced Pages

User talk:George: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:10, 6 September 2009 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:George/Archive 1← Previous edit Revision as of 21:11, 8 September 2009 edit undoWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:George/Archive 1Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
I would like to inform you George you may not post more than 3 times a day on a single article. This is a warning. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I would like to inform you George you may not post more than 3 times a day on a single article. This is a warning. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Randomly walking around on Misplaced Pages, I saw that note, and I couldn't resist explaining that this so called warning is '''not true''' in any way at all. Do '''not''' trust anonymous warnings: you can post as many times as you wish on an article — I've done it many times without trouble. There is a ], but that doesn't apply to editing. Keep on editing, keep your spirits high, and edit to your hearts contents. Cheers! ... said: ] (]) 08:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC) :Randomly walking around on Misplaced Pages, I saw that note, and I couldn't resist explaining that this so called warning is '''not true''' in any way at all. Do '''not''' trust anonymous warnings: you can post as many times as you wish on an article — I've done it many times without trouble. There is a ], but that doesn't apply to editing. Keep on editing, keep your spirits high, and edit to your hearts contents. Cheers! ... said: ] (]) 08:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

==Muhammad al-Durrah==

I'm pressed for time right now, and if the wording is changed, I won't revert again. People who think this is a hoax are crackpots, in my opinion, and they discredit themselves. ] (]) 16:26, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm having trouble posting at the moment, but please note that the last sentence in your proposed rewording is wrong; the Israeli government disclaimed its own spokesman's claims about the case, saying that he was only expressing his personal opinion. The government's position is that it has nothing further to add to the official reports that were done at the time (i.e. exonerating the IDF). -- ] (]) 18:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


==I disagree with part of your edit of ]== ==I disagree with part of your edit of ]==

Revision as of 21:11, 8 September 2009

Template:Werdnabot

I would like to inform you George you may not post more than 3 times a day on a single article. This is a warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.71.189 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Randomly walking around on Misplaced Pages, I saw that note, and I couldn't resist explaining that this so called warning is not true in any way at all. Do not trust anonymous warnings: you can post as many times as you wish on an article — I've done it many times without trouble. There is a three revert rule, but that doesn't apply to editing. Keep on editing, keep your spirits high, and edit to your hearts contents. Cheers! ... said: Rursus (bork²) 08:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

I disagree with part of your edit of 2006 Lebanon War

Your removal of the phrase "On July 14, 2009 an underground Hezbollah ammunition depot set off a massive series of explosions in the South Lebanese village of Khirbat Silim, just ten miles north of the Israeli-Lebanese border" greatly detracted from the article. Subbing in the word "explosion" just didn't cut it. Nezzadar (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I disagree with part of your edit of 2006 Lebanon War

I agree with Nezzadar on this. The explosions were multiple and massive sending many of the residents in the village into a panic. The original wording, ("On July 14, 2009 an underground Hezbollah ammunition depot set off a massive series of explosions in the South Lebanese village of Khirbat Silim, just ten miles north of the Israeli-Lebanese border") was a more accurate reflection of actual events.

Also, in the Nov 21, 2005 abduction attempt, four, not three gunmen were killed. The first 3 were killed when the bullet hit the Hezbollah munitions and a fouth was killed later in the battle.

It would have been nice of you to consult with me before making changes and we could come to consensus. Jiujitsuguy--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 04:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Montero Loan

Re: Yeah, I hadn't seen your response to the Montero discussion yet. I've been waiting for a reliable source to state that he's been signed (maybe the FSC broadcast would be good enough) so that we can remove it. Until it's announced via a reliable source, I was just going to keep it in line with the club site. I typically assume that an IP editor has not read the discussion about it (in this case he/she didn't even remove the comment begging to read the discussion before changing). I can't tell from your comment whether you think we should remove it or not. If you think it should be removed, I'm okay with that actually. I just don't want IP editors to use Misplaced Pages as a rumormill (they have in the past). --SkotyWA|Contribs 03:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)