| Revision as of 09:09, 11 September 2009 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:George/Archive 1← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:25, 11 September 2009 edit undoJiujitsuguy (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,155 edits →A little balance pleaseNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| George, please don't talk to me about bias. When I first came across this Wiki article, I thought I was reading recruitment propaganda for Hezbollah. As far as your revisions to my edits are concerned, I found ''them'' to be poorly written with numerous gramatical as well as spelling errors which necessitated correction. I can deal with some of your revisions in the interest of conciliation. However, others I simply will not tolerate. In the future, have some decency and before making revisions come to my talk page and we can discuss it. Who knows? Maybe you can convince me or I can convince you. In any event, we're both rational people who can come to compromise.--] (]) 04:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC) | George, please don't talk to me about bias. When I first came across this Wiki article, I thought I was reading recruitment propaganda for Hezbollah. As far as your revisions to my edits are concerned, I found ''them'' to be poorly written with numerous gramatical as well as spelling errors which necessitated correction. I can deal with some of your revisions in the interest of conciliation. However, others I simply will not tolerate. In the future, have some decency and before making revisions come to my talk page and we can discuss it. Who knows? Maybe you can convince me or I can convince you. In any event, we're both rational people who can come to compromise.--] (]) 04:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Hello George. Sorry for coming off a bit rash. I hope that my edits and your revisions to them enable the wiki reader to have a better and more balanced view of the conflict. Have a good weekend.--] (]) 17:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Montero Loan == | == Montero Loan == | ||
Revision as of 17:25, 11 September 2009
A little balance please
Hello George. I must admit to being puzzled by your last revisions to my edits. The article cites long, prominent quotations that highlight alleged IDF shortcomings and magnify the alleged skill of Hezbollah guerillas. Yet you didn’t butcher these quotes as you did mine. So I’m curious George, what makes these quotes, left unmolested by you, different than the quotes that I cited? --Jiujitsuguy (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
George, please don't talk to me about bias. When I first came across this Wiki article, I thought I was reading recruitment propaganda for Hezbollah. As far as your revisions to my edits are concerned, I found them to be poorly written with numerous gramatical as well as spelling errors which necessitated correction. I can deal with some of your revisions in the interest of conciliation. However, others I simply will not tolerate. In the future, have some decency and before making revisions come to my talk page and we can discuss it. Who knows? Maybe you can convince me or I can convince you. In any event, we're both rational people who can come to compromise.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 04:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello George. Sorry for coming off a bit rash. I hope that my edits and your revisions to them enable the wiki reader to have a better and more balanced view of the conflict. Have a good weekend.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Montero Loan
Re: Yeah, I hadn't seen your response to the Montero discussion yet. I've been waiting for a reliable source to state that he's been signed (maybe the FSC broadcast would be good enough) so that we can remove it. Until it's announced via a reliable source, I was just going to keep it in line with the club site. I typically assume that an IP editor has not read the discussion about it (in this case he/she didn't even remove the comment begging to read the discussion before changing). I can't tell from your comment whether you think we should remove it or not. If you think it should be removed, I'm okay with that actually. I just don't want IP editors to use Misplaced Pages as a rumormill (they have in the past). --SkotyWA|Contribs 03:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)