| Revision as of 16:58, 14 September 2009 editHillock65 (talk | contribs)4,431 edits →Aftermath and significance: Modified sentence← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:11, 14 September 2009 edit undoVoyevoda (talk | contribs)3,989 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| date=] ]| | date=] ]| | ||
| place=], ]| | place=], ]| | ||
| result=] victory| | result=] coalition victory| | ||
| combatant1=]<br>]<br>]| | combatant1=]<br>Cossacks loyal to ]<br>]| | ||
| combatant2=]<br>Cossacks |
combatant2=]<br>Cossacks loyal to ]| | ||
| commander1=]<br>]<br>]| | commander1=]<br>]<br>]| | ||
| commander2=]<br>Knyaz ]{{POW}}<br>Knyaz ]{{POW}}| | commander2=]<br>Knyaz ]{{POW}}<br>Knyaz ]{{POW}}| | ||
| strength1=30,000-35,000 Crimean Tatars<br>16,000 Vyhovsky Cossacks<br>1,500-3,000 Polish, German and Wallachian mercenaries<ref>Бабулин И.Б. Битва под Конотопом. 28 июня 1659 года — М.: Цейхгауз, 2009</ref>| | |||
| strength1=60,000| | |||
| strength2=24,600 cavalry<br/>6,600 Cossacks of Bespaly<ref name="ReferenceA">Новосельский А.А. Борьба Московского государства с татарами во второй половине XVII века // Новосельский А.А. Исследования по истории эпохи феодализма (Научное наследие). М., 1994. С. 25</ref><ref>Бабулин И.Б. Битва под Конотопом. 28 июня 1659 года — М.: Цейхгауз, 2009</ref>.| | |||
| strength2= between 100,000 and 150,000 <ref name=Solovyov/><ref>The number of Russian troops varies in different sources. "The cronicle of the Witness" puts the number of Russian troops at 100,000 men, while the famous Russian historian Sergei Solovyov gives the number at 150,000 or more </ref>| | |||
| casualties1= |
casualties1=6,000 Crimean Tatars,<br>4,000 Cossacks| | ||
| casualties2=between |
casualties2=between 7,000 and 10,000| | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Campaignbox Russo-Polish War (1654–1667)}} | {{Campaignbox Russo-Polish War (1654–1667)}} | ||
| The '''Battle of Konotop''' (also known as '''Battle of Sosnivka''') was a battle fought between ] |
The '''Battle of Konotop''' (also known as '''Battle of Sosnivka''') was a battle fought between the allies of the ] ] ] and cavalry units of the ] army, led by the princes ] und ], on ] ] near the town of ] (now ], ]). In this battle where on the side of Vyhovsky the ] were the major power<ref>]: , 10.07.2009</ref> the Russian cavalry was defeated while the main army under command of ] had to interrupt the siege of Konotop. However, the result of the battle only intensified tensions in Ukraine and led to Vyhovsky's political defeat and removal from power several month later. | ||
| ==Prelude== | ==Prelude== | ||
| The Battle of Konotop took place during the period of ] that is generally referred to as the ]. This was the time after the death of Hetman ], during which many power struggles withing the Cossack elite took place. Arguably, these power struggles were instigated by the Russian tsar, in an effort to diminish the power of the Cossacks <ref name="maidan.org.ua" /> | The Battle of Konotop took place during the period of ] that is generally referred to as the ]. This was the time after the death of Hetman ], during which many power struggles withing the Cossack elite took place. Arguably, these power struggles were instigated by the Russian tsar, in an effort to diminish the power of the Cossacks <ref name="maidan.org.ua"> http://maidan.org.ua/static/mai/1247081324.html</ref>. | ||
| During his reign, Bohdan Khmelnytsky managed to ] out of ] domination, but was later forced to enter into new and uneasy relation with ] in ]. His successor, General Chancellor and close adviser ], was left to deal with ]'s growing interference in Ukraine's internal affairs and even overt instigation of a civil war by way of supporting Cossack factions opposing Vyhovsky<ref name="maidan.org.ua" />. With the situation deteriorating rapidly and opposition to his rule mounting, Vyhovsky entered into negotiations with his former foes, the Poles, and finally concluded a ] on ] ]. Under the new treaty three voyevodships of central Ukraine<ref></ref> (Kiev, Bratslav and Podilya) were to become an equal constituent nation <ref></ref> of the ] along with Poland and ] under the name of |
During his reign, Bohdan Khmelnytsky managed to ] out of ] domination, but was later forced to enter into new and uneasy relation with ] in ]. His successor, General Chancellor and close adviser ], was left to deal with ]'s growing interference in Ukraine's internal affairs and even overt instigation of a civil war by way of supporting Cossack factions opposing Vyhovsky<ref name="maidan.org.ua" />. With the situation deteriorating rapidly and opposition to his rule mounting, Vyhovsky entered into negotiations with his former foes, the Poles, and finally concluded a ] on ] ]. Under the new treaty three voyevodships of central Ukraine<ref></ref> (Kiev, Bratslav and Podilya) were to become an equal constituent nation <ref></ref> of the ] along with Poland and ] under the name of Principality of Rus, forming the ]. | ||
| The news of a Cossack-Polish alliance alarmed Moscow and the Ukrainian cossacks opposing Vyhovsky (led by ]) to the extent that an expeditionary force was dispatched to Ukraine in the autumn of ] headed by Prince ]. Moscow's military commander not only supported the election by Vyhovsky's opponents of a new rival ], but started actively to occupy towns held by Vyhovsky's supporters. The latter were mercilessly exterminated along with widespread abuse and robbery of the civilian population.<ref name = "KR">.</ref> | The news of a Cossack-Polish alliance alarmed Moscow and the Ukrainian cossacks opposing Vyhovsky (led by ]) to the extent that an expeditionary force was dispatched to Ukraine in the autumn of ] headed by Prince ]. Moscow's military commander not only supported the election by Vyhovsky's opponents of a new rival ], but started actively to occupy towns held by Vyhovsky's supporters. The latter were mercilessly exterminated along with widespread abuse and robbery of the civilian population.<ref name = "KR">.</ref> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ==Siege of Konotop== | ==Siege of Konotop== | ||
| ] | |||
| Prince Trubetskoy's hopes for quick resolution of the Konotop stand-off were dimmed when Hulyanytsky and his Cossacks refused point blank to betray hetman Vyhovsky and mounted fierce and protracted defence of Konotop. According to a historian Markevych, on ] ], after a morning prayer, Trubetskoy ordered an all-out assault on the fortress's fortifications. The city was shelled, a few ] bombs were dropped inside, and the huge army moved on to capture the city. At one point the troops of Trubetskoy even broke inside the city walls, but were thrown back by the fierce resistance of the Cossacks inside. After the fiasco of the initial assault, Trubetskoy abandoned his plans of a quick assault and proceeded to shell the city and to fill the ] with earth. The Cossacks stubbornly held on in spite of all the fire unleashed on the city: during the night the earth put to fill in the moat was used to strengthen the city walls, and the besieged even undertook several daring counterattacks on Trubetskoy's besieging army. These attacks forced Prince Trubetskoy to move his military camp 10 km away from the city and thereby split his forces between the main army at his HQ and the army besieging Konotop. It is estimated that in the siege alone the Trubetskoy forces suffered casualties up to 10,000 men.<ref name = "Grad">.</ref> Instead of a quick campaign the siege dragged on for 70 days and gave Vyhovsky the much-needed time to prepare for the battle with the Russian army. | Prince Trubetskoy's hopes for quick resolution of the Konotop stand-off were dimmed when Hulyanytsky and his Cossacks refused point blank to betray hetman Vyhovsky and mounted fierce and protracted defence of Konotop. According to a historian Markevych, on ] ], after a morning prayer, Trubetskoy ordered an all-out assault on the fortress's fortifications. The city was shelled, a few ] bombs were dropped inside, and the huge army moved on to capture the city. At one point the troops of Trubetskoy even broke inside the city walls, but were thrown back by the fierce resistance of the Cossacks inside. After the fiasco of the initial assault, Trubetskoy abandoned his plans of a quick assault and proceeded to shell the city and to fill the ] with earth. The Cossacks stubbornly held on in spite of all the fire unleashed on the city: during the night the earth put to fill in the moat was used to strengthen the city walls, and the besieged even undertook several daring counterattacks on Trubetskoy's besieging army. These attacks forced Prince Trubetskoy to move his military camp 10 km away from the city and thereby split his forces between the main army at his HQ and the army besieging Konotop. It is estimated that in the siege alone the Trubetskoy forces suffered casualties up to 10,000 men.<ref name = "Grad">.</ref> Instead of a quick campaign the siege dragged on for 70 days and gave Vyhovsky the much-needed time to prepare for the battle with the Russian army. | ||
| Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
| ==Battle== | ==Battle== | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| By ] ] Vyhovsky and his allies approached the area and defeated a small reconnaissance detachment of the invader's army near the village of Shapovalivka, several kilometers south-west of Konotop. According to the plan made that evening, the 30,000 Tatars were left in an ambush south-east of the river Sosnivka, and Vyhovsky's forces with Poles and mercenaries were positioned at the village of Sosnivka, south of the river with the same name <ref name =Bulvinsky></ref> | By ] ] Vyhovsky and his allies approached the area and defeated a small reconnaissance detachment of the invader's army near the village of Shapovalivka, several kilometers south-west of Konotop. According to the plan made that evening, the 30,000 Tatars were left in an ambush south-east of the river Sosnivka, and Vyhovsky's forces with Poles and mercenaries were positioned at the village of Sosnivka, south of the river with the same name <ref name =Bulvinsky></ref> | ||
| Meanwhile, Vyhovsky left the command of his forces to the brother of Hryhoriy Hulyanytsky, Stepan Hulyanytsky, and at the head of a small Cossack detachment left for Konotop <ref name=Solovyov/>. Early morning of ] ], Vyhovsky's detachment attacked Trubetskoy's army near Konotop, and using this sudden and unexpected attack managed to capture a sizable number of the enemy's horses and drive them away and further into the steppe <ref name=Bulvinsky/>. The enemy counterattacked, and Vyhovsky retreated across the bridge to the other bank of the Sosnivka river in the direction of his camp <ref name=Solovyov/>. Having learned of the assault, Prince Trubetskoy dispatched a large detachment of 30,000 men, led by Prince Semen Pozharsky and Cossacks of appointed rival ] Bezpalyi, across the river to pursue Ivan Vyhovsky. Trubetskoy's forces were thus divided between this detachment, those besieging Konotop and the 30,000 at his HQ <ref name=Solovyov/>. | Meanwhile, Vyhovsky left the command of his forces to the brother of Hryhoriy Hulyanytsky, Stepan Hulyanytsky, and at the head of a small Cossack detachment left for Konotop <ref name=Solovyov/>. Early morning of ] ], Vyhovsky's detachment attacked Trubetskoy's army near Konotop, and using this sudden and unexpected attack managed to capture a sizable number of the enemy's horses and drive them away and further into the steppe <ref name=Bulvinsky/>. The enemy counterattacked, and Vyhovsky retreated across the bridge to the other bank of the Sosnivka river in the direction of his camp <ref name=Solovyov/>. Having learned of the assault, Prince Trubetskoy dispatched a large detachment of 30,000 men, led by Prince Semen Pozharsky and Cossacks of appointed rival ] Bezpalyi, across the river to pursue Ivan Vyhovsky. Trubetskoy's forces were thus divided between this detachment, those besieging Konotop and the 30,000 at his HQ <ref name=Solovyov/>. | ||
| ] | |||
| On ] ] Prince Semen Pozharsky, in his pursuit of the Cossacks, crossed the river Sosnivka and made his camp on the southern bank of the river. During the night a small Cossack detachment led by Stepan Hulyanytsky, having padded the hoofs of their horses with cloth, stole under the cover of night behind the enemy lines and captured the bridge that Pozharsky used to cross the river. The bridge was dismantled and the river dammed, thus flooding the valley around it. | On ] ] Prince Semen Pozharsky, in his pursuit of the Cossacks, crossed the river Sosnivka and made his camp on the southern bank of the river. During the night a small Cossack detachment led by Stepan Hulyanytsky, having padded the hoofs of their horses with cloth, stole under the cover of night behind the enemy lines and captured the bridge that Pozharsky used to cross the river. The bridge was dismantled and the river dammed, thus flooding the valley around it. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
| ::''The bloom of Moscow's cavalry, troops that happily accomplished campaigns of year 54 and 55 have perished in one day — the victors got only about 5000 captive. The unfortunate were led onto an open space and slaughtered like lambs — that was the agreement between the ] and the ] of the ]! Never again was the ] of Moscow able to master an army that strong. In mourning clothes showed himself ] to the people and the terror seized Moscow. The blow was so hard because it was unexpected, and it followed such illustrious successes! It was only recently that Dolgoruki brought to Moscow a captured Lithuanian hetman, only recently was everyone talking about successes of ] — and now Trubetskoy, for whom everyone had hopes higher than for others, and who was "a man devout and graceful, in military affairs skilled and a fright for a foe" — has ruined such a huge army! After capture of so many towns, after capture of the Lithuanian capital the royal city trembled for its own security: in August by tsar's decree people of all ranks hurried to build fortifications around Moscow. Often the tsar and the boyars were present themselves during the construction; people from outlying areas, their families with meagre belongings filled Moscow, and a rumour spread that the tsar was leaving to beyond the ] and ]''<ref name=Solovyov/>. | ::''The bloom of Moscow's cavalry, troops that happily accomplished campaigns of year 54 and 55 have perished in one day — the victors got only about 5000 captive. The unfortunate were led onto an open space and slaughtered like lambs — that was the agreement between the ] and the ] of the ]! Never again was the ] of Moscow able to master an army that strong. In mourning clothes showed himself ] to the people and the terror seized Moscow. The blow was so hard because it was unexpected, and it followed such illustrious successes! It was only recently that Dolgoruki brought to Moscow a captured Lithuanian hetman, only recently was everyone talking about successes of ] — and now Trubetskoy, for whom everyone had hopes higher than for others, and who was "a man devout and graceful, in military affairs skilled and a fright for a foe" — has ruined such a huge army! After capture of so many towns, after capture of the Lithuanian capital the royal city trembled for its own security: in August by tsar's decree people of all ranks hurried to build fortifications around Moscow. Often the tsar and the boyars were present themselves during the construction; people from outlying areas, their families with meagre belongings filled Moscow, and a rumour spread that the tsar was leaving to beyond the ] and ]''<ref name=Solovyov/>. | ||
| However, the Russian tsar did not have to worry; the Ukrainian civil war of the ] period accomplished what Trubetskoy and his troops could not. Had only hetman Vyhovsky and his allies been able to capture a few of Ukrainian towns held by his opponents, when the first bad news arrived: Cossacks of the ] led by ] attacked Crimean outposts in the south, and Khan Giray was forced to leave him for his country. |
However, the Russian tsar did not have to worry; the Ukrainian civil war of the ] period accomplished what Trubetskoy and his troops could not. Had only hetman Vyhovsky and his allies been able to capture a few of Ukrainian towns held by his opponents, when the first bad news arrived: Cossacks of the ] led by ] attacked Crimean outposts in the south, and Khan Giray was forced to leave him for his country. The raid of Sirko was caused by unrestrained pillaging of Ukrainian villages by Crimean Tatars who saw it as a compensation if not the main sense for their engagement, facing no protest from Vyhovsky who was heavily dependent on them. The devastations, killings and enslavement were among the factors that had strengthened popular rage against Vyhovsky. A few cities rebelled against Vyhovsky immediately: ], ], ], ]<ref name="dorosh">Дорошенко Д. Нарис історії України. Львів: Світ, 1991, с 294</ref>. It was only 2 months after the battle when the citizens of ] gave a ceremonial welcome to Trubetskoy and swear an oath of allegiance to the Russian tsar.<ref name="dorosh" /> The same month the Ukrainian citizens and cossacks regiments in ], ], ] swore an oath to the tsar as well <ref>Каргалов В.В. Русские воеводы 16-17 веков. М.:Вече, 2005. - с.280.</ref>. | ||
| Thus Vyhovsky was left to deal with the growing opposition to his rule. By the end of the year he was forced to resign and to flee to Poland <ref name="dorosh" /> where he was later executed by the Poles in ]. His defeat is largely attributed to his alliance with the very unpopular Poles and his inability to seek support among all the strata of the Ukrainian population and not just among the rich Cossack elite, who were willing to betray him at every opportunity either to Moscow or ]. The civil war raged on and the victors of the Konotop battle were soon forgotten. | Thus Vyhovsky was left to deal with the growing opposition to his rule. By the end of the year he was forced to resign and to flee to Poland <ref name="dorosh" /> where he was later executed by the Poles in ]. His defeat is largely attributed to his alliance with the very unpopular Poles and his inability to seek support among all the strata of the Ukrainian population and not just among the rich Cossack elite, who were willing to betray him at every opportunity either to Moscow or ]. The civil war raged on and the victors of the Konotop battle were soon forgotten. | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 14 September 2009
| Battle of Konotop | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of Ukrainian civil war - The Ruin 1657-1687 and the Russo-Polish War (1654–1667) | |||||||
| File:KONO 02.JPG | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
|
Crimean Khanate Cossacks loyal to Vyhovsky Poland |
Russian Tsardom Cossacks loyal to Bespaly | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
Mehmed IV Giray Ivan Vyhovsky Andrzej Potocki |
Aleksey Trubetskoy Knyaz Pozharsky (POW) Knyaz Lvov (POW) | ||||||
| Strength | |||||||
|
30,000-35,000 Crimean Tatars 16,000 Vyhovsky Cossacks 1,500-3,000 Polish, German and Wallachian mercenaries |
24,600 cavalry 6,600 Cossacks of Bespaly. | ||||||
| Casualties and losses | |||||||
|
6,000 Crimean Tatars, 4,000 Cossacks | between 7,000 and 10,000 | ||||||
| Russo-Polish War of 1654–1667 | |
|---|---|
|
The Battle of Konotop (also known as Battle of Sosnivka) was a battle fought between the allies of the Ukrainian Hetman Ivan Vyhovsky and cavalry units of the Russian army, led by the princes Semyon Pozharsky und Semyon Lvov, on June 29 1659 near the town of Konotop (now Sumska Oblast, Ukraine). In this battle where on the side of Vyhovsky the Crimean Tatars were the major power the Russian cavalry was defeated while the main army under command of Alexey Trubetskoy had to interrupt the siege of Konotop. However, the result of the battle only intensified tensions in Ukraine and led to Vyhovsky's political defeat and removal from power several month later.
Prelude
The Battle of Konotop took place during the period of Ukrainian history that is generally referred to as the Ruin. This was the time after the death of Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky, during which many power struggles withing the Cossack elite took place. Arguably, these power struggles were instigated by the Russian tsar, in an effort to diminish the power of the Cossacks .
During his reign, Bohdan Khmelnytsky managed to wrestle Ukraine out of Polish domination, but was later forced to enter into new and uneasy relation with Russian Tsardom in 1654. His successor, General Chancellor and close adviser Ivan Vyhovsky, was left to deal with Moscow's growing interference in Ukraine's internal affairs and even overt instigation of a civil war by way of supporting Cossack factions opposing Vyhovsky. With the situation deteriorating rapidly and opposition to his rule mounting, Vyhovsky entered into negotiations with his former foes, the Poles, and finally concluded a Treaty of Hadiach on September 16 1658. Under the new treaty three voyevodships of central Ukraine (Kiev, Bratslav and Podilya) were to become an equal constituent nation of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth along with Poland and Lithuania under the name of Principality of Rus, forming the Polish-Lithuanian-Ruthenian Commonwealth.
The news of a Cossack-Polish alliance alarmed Moscow and the Ukrainian cossacks opposing Vyhovsky (led by Ivan Bezpalyi) to the extent that an expeditionary force was dispatched to Ukraine in the autumn of 1658 headed by Prince Grigory Romodanovsky. Moscow's military commander not only supported the election by Vyhovsky's opponents of a new rival hetman, but started actively to occupy towns held by Vyhovsky's supporters. The latter were mercilessly exterminated along with widespread abuse and robbery of the civilian population.
The situation having escalated that far, open hostilities followed. Skirmishes and attacks occurred in different towns and regions throughout the country, the most prominent of which was the capture of Konotop by Cossacks of the Nizhyn and Chernihiv Regiments headed by Hryhoriy Hulyanytsky, a colonel of Nizhyn. In the spring of 1659 a huge army of 100,000 according to "The cronicle of the Witness" or 150,000 men according to Russian historian Sergey Solovyov — was dispatched to Ukraine to assist Romodanovsky.
The army came to the Ukrainian border on January, 30, 1659 and stood 40 days till Trubetskoy negotiated with Vyhovsky since the Russian commander had instructions to persuade the Cossacks. Vyhovsky's rival Cossack forces of commanders Bezpaly, Voronko and Zaporizhian Cossacks of Barabash joined the Russian troops. The supreme military commander Prince Aleksey Trubetskoy decided to finish off the small 4,000 garrison of the Konotop castle held by Cossacks of Hulyanytsky before proceeding in his pursuit of Vyhovsky.
Siege of Konotop
Prince Trubetskoy's hopes for quick resolution of the Konotop stand-off were dimmed when Hulyanytsky and his Cossacks refused point blank to betray hetman Vyhovsky and mounted fierce and protracted defence of Konotop. According to a historian Markevych, on April 21 1659, after a morning prayer, Trubetskoy ordered an all-out assault on the fortress's fortifications. The city was shelled, a few incendiary bombs were dropped inside, and the huge army moved on to capture the city. At one point the troops of Trubetskoy even broke inside the city walls, but were thrown back by the fierce resistance of the Cossacks inside. After the fiasco of the initial assault, Trubetskoy abandoned his plans of a quick assault and proceeded to shell the city and to fill the moat with earth. The Cossacks stubbornly held on in spite of all the fire unleashed on the city: during the night the earth put to fill in the moat was used to strengthen the city walls, and the besieged even undertook several daring counterattacks on Trubetskoy's besieging army. These attacks forced Prince Trubetskoy to move his military camp 10 km away from the city and thereby split his forces between the main army at his HQ and the army besieging Konotop. It is estimated that in the siege alone the Trubetskoy forces suffered casualties up to 10,000 men. Instead of a quick campaign the siege dragged on for 70 days and gave Vyhovsky the much-needed time to prepare for the battle with the Russian army.
The hetman not only managed to organize his own troops, but secured support of his allies — the Crimean Tatars and the Poles. By agreement with the Tatars, the Khan Mehmed IV Giray, at the head of his 30,000-strong army, made his way towards Konotop in early summer of 1659, as did the 4000-man Polish detachment with the support of Serbian, Moldavian and German mercenaries.
Battle
By June 24 1659 Vyhovsky and his allies approached the area and defeated a small reconnaissance detachment of the invader's army near the village of Shapovalivka, several kilometers south-west of Konotop. According to the plan made that evening, the 30,000 Tatars were left in an ambush south-east of the river Sosnivka, and Vyhovsky's forces with Poles and mercenaries were positioned at the village of Sosnivka, south of the river with the same name
Meanwhile, Vyhovsky left the command of his forces to the brother of Hryhoriy Hulyanytsky, Stepan Hulyanytsky, and at the head of a small Cossack detachment left for Konotop . Early morning of June 27 1659, Vyhovsky's detachment attacked Trubetskoy's army near Konotop, and using this sudden and unexpected attack managed to capture a sizable number of the enemy's horses and drive them away and further into the steppe . The enemy counterattacked, and Vyhovsky retreated across the bridge to the other bank of the Sosnivka river in the direction of his camp . Having learned of the assault, Prince Trubetskoy dispatched a large detachment of 30,000 men, led by Prince Semen Pozharsky and Cossacks of appointed rival hetman Bezpalyi, across the river to pursue Ivan Vyhovsky. Trubetskoy's forces were thus divided between this detachment, those besieging Konotop and the 30,000 at his HQ .
On June 28 1659 Prince Semen Pozharsky, in his pursuit of the Cossacks, crossed the river Sosnivka and made his camp on the southern bank of the river. During the night a small Cossack detachment led by Stepan Hulyanytsky, having padded the hoofs of their horses with cloth, stole under the cover of night behind the enemy lines and captured the bridge that Pozharsky used to cross the river. The bridge was dismantled and the river dammed, thus flooding the valley around it.
Early on the morning of June 29 1659, Vyhovsky at the head of a small detachment attacked Prince Pozharsky's army. After a little skirmish with a far larger army than his, he started to retreat, feigning a disorganized flight in the direction of his main forces. The unsuspecting Pozharsky ordered his army to pursue the enemy. Once the enemy's army entered Sosnivka, the Cossacks fired three cannon shots to give the signal to the Tatars and counterattacked with all the forces stationed at Sosnivka. Having discovered the trap, Prince Semen Pozharsky ordered retreat; but his heavy cavalry and the artillery got bogged down in the soggy ground created from the flooding the night before. At this moment the Tatars also advanced from the eastern flank, and the outright slaughter ensued. Almost all 30,000 troops perished, with few of them captured alive. Among the captured were Prince Semen Romanovich Pozharsky himself, Prince Semen Petrovich Lvov, both Princes Buturlins, Prince Lyapunov, Prince Skuratov, Prince Kurakin and others. A relative of the Great Liberator of Moscow from the Poles, Dmitry Pozharsky, Prince Semen Romanovich Pozharsky was brought before the Khan of Crimea Mehmed IV Giray. Pozharsky was bold with the Khan according to the Witness, and according to Russian historian Sergey Solovyov he even hurled obscenities and spat in the Khan's face. For that he was promptly beheaded by the Tatars, and his severed head was dispatched with one of the captives to Prince Trubetskoy's camp.
Having learned about the defeat of Pozharsky's army, Trubetskoy ordered the siege of Konotop lifted and started his retreat from Ukraine. At that moment the Cossacks of Hulyanytsky inside the fortress emerged from behind the walls and attacked the retreating army. Trubetskoy lost, in addition, most of his artillery, his military banners and the treasury. The retreating army defended well and Vyhovsky and the Tatars abandoned their 3-day long pursuit near the Russian border.
Aftermath and significance
As Trubetskoy's troops arrived in Putivl, the news of the battle reached Moscow as well. A prominent Russian historian of the 19th century, Sergey Solovyov, described it this way:
- The bloom of Moscow's cavalry, troops that happily accomplished campaigns of year 54 and 55 have perished in one day — the victors got only about 5000 captive. The unfortunate were led onto an open space and slaughtered like lambs — that was the agreement between the Crimean Khan and the hetman of the Zaporozhian Cossacks! Never again was the tsar of Moscow able to master an army that strong. In mourning clothes showed himself Alexei Mikhailovich to the people and the terror seized Moscow. The blow was so hard because it was unexpected, and it followed such illustrious successes! It was only recently that Dolgoruki brought to Moscow a captured Lithuanian hetman, only recently was everyone talking about successes of Khovansky — and now Trubetskoy, for whom everyone had hopes higher than for others, and who was "a man devout and graceful, in military affairs skilled and a fright for a foe" — has ruined such a huge army! After capture of so many towns, after capture of the Lithuanian capital the royal city trembled for its own security: in August by tsar's decree people of all ranks hurried to build fortifications around Moscow. Often the tsar and the boyars were present themselves during the construction; people from outlying areas, their families with meagre belongings filled Moscow, and a rumour spread that the tsar was leaving to beyond the Volga and Yaroslavl.
However, the Russian tsar did not have to worry; the Ukrainian civil war of the Ruin period accomplished what Trubetskoy and his troops could not. Had only hetman Vyhovsky and his allies been able to capture a few of Ukrainian towns held by his opponents, when the first bad news arrived: Cossacks of the Zaporozhian Host led by Ivan Sirko attacked Crimean outposts in the south, and Khan Giray was forced to leave him for his country. The raid of Sirko was caused by unrestrained pillaging of Ukrainian villages by Crimean Tatars who saw it as a compensation if not the main sense for their engagement, facing no protest from Vyhovsky who was heavily dependent on them. The devastations, killings and enslavement were among the factors that had strengthened popular rage against Vyhovsky. A few cities rebelled against Vyhovsky immediately: Lokhvytsia, Hadyach, Poltava, Romny. It was only 2 months after the battle when the citizens of Nizhyn gave a ceremonial welcome to Trubetskoy and swear an oath of allegiance to the Russian tsar. The same month the Ukrainian citizens and cossacks regiments in Kiev, Pereyaslav, Chernihiv swore an oath to the tsar as well .
Thus Vyhovsky was left to deal with the growing opposition to his rule. By the end of the year he was forced to resign and to flee to Poland where he was later executed by the Poles in 1664. His defeat is largely attributed to his alliance with the very unpopular Poles and his inability to seek support among all the strata of the Ukrainian population and not just among the rich Cossack elite, who were willing to betray him at every opportunity either to Moscow or Warsaw. The civil war raged on and the victors of the Konotop battle were soon forgotten.
Together with a number of other battles between East Slavs, such as Battle of Orsha, the Konotop battle was with a few exceptions an abandoned topic in Russian Imperial and in Soviet historiography . This attitude towards this event is explained by the fact that it dispelled some Russian propaganda positions about the unity of East Slavs , in particular the ones about "eternal friendship of Russian and Ukrainian peoples" and about "natural desire of Ukrainians for union with Russia". For all the skill and the bravery of the Cossacks — especially those defending Konotop — it still remains a bitter victory. A victory that did not have any significant impact on the course of Ukrainian history, where fratricidal war of the Ruin and personal ambitions of treacherous hetmans prevailed . As such, the Konotop battle remains a classic example of the battle won and a war lost.
Sources
- Orest Subtelny. Ukraine. A history. University of Toronto press. 1994. ISBN 0-8020-0591-0.
- David Mackenzie, Michael W. Curran. A History of Russia, the Soviet Union, and Beyond. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California. p. 200, 1993. ISBN 0-534-17970-3.
- Yuri Mytsyk. Battle of Konotop 1659
- Sokolov C. M. Continuation of reign of Alexi Mikhailovich. Chapter 1.
- Makhun S. Battle of Konotop. Reittarr. No. 23.
References
- Бабулин И.Б. Битва под Конотопом. 28 июня 1659 года — М.: Цейхгауз, 2009
- Новосельский А.А. Борьба Московского государства с татарами во второй половине XVII века // Новосельский А.А. Исследования по истории эпохи феодализма (Научное наследие). М., 1994. С. 25
- Бабулин И.Б. Битва под Конотопом. 28 июня 1659 года — М.: Цейхгауз, 2009
- Lenta.Ru: Tatyana Tairova-Yakovleva. What was and what became the battle of Konotop?, 10.07.2009
- ^ http://maidan.org.ua/static/mai/1247081324.html
- Treaty of Hadyach (1658, Ukraine)
- Українська держава наприкінці XVII століття
- History of Little Russia (N. Маrkevich).
- ^ The Reign of Tsar Alexi Mikhailovich. (Solovyov S. М.)
- ^ The Konotop battle of 1659..
- ^ A. G. Bulvinsky. History of Ukrainian military and military art.
- ^ Дорошенко Д. Нарис історії України. Львів: Світ, 1991, с 294
- Каргалов В.В. Русские воеводы 16-17 веков. М.:Вече, 2005. - с.280.
- BBCUkrainian.com
- Yuriy Mitsyk. The Glory of Konotop.
- The Konotop Battle. S. Makhun.
External links
- The Reign of Tsar Alexi Mikhailovich. (Solovyov S. М.) (Rus.)
- History of Konotop (Ukr.)
- Historical Encyclopedia (Ukr.)
- The Konotop Tragedy. 1659. (Rus.)
- The Battle of Konotop (Rus.)
- History of Little Russia (N. Маrkevich) (Rus.)
- The Konotop Battle. S. Makhun. (Rus.)
- The Konotop battle: The victory that could have been avoided but should be remembered. (Ukr.)
51°13′21″N 33°09′31″E / 51.2224361211°N 33.1584777878°E / 51.2224361211; 33.1584777878
Categories: