Revision as of 19:10, 25 September 2002 editBryceHarrington (talk | contribs)403 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 25 September 2002 edit undoSoulpatch (talk | contribs)1,639 edits Article sas way too glowing in favor of Manifest Destiny. Tried to make it more balanced.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Manifest Destiny''' was a phrase used by politicians and leaders | |||
in the United States in the |
in the ] in the ] to justify and promote | ||
territorial expansion across the ] continent by providing a sense of mission to citizens. It promoted this sense of mission by fomenting a desire to establish a large empire-like nation in which the ideals of ], freedom, and progress are ostensibly protected and promoted across. | |||
mission to citizens. It is the desire to establish a large | |||
empire-like nation in which the ideals of democracy, freedom, and | |||
progress are protected and promoted across. | |||
In theory, one aspect of this desire was its principle to bring the | |||
ideals of democratic self-government to any peoples capable of it |
ideals of democratic self-government to any peoples capable of it; in practice, | ||
however, this often meant excluding ] and those with | |||
non-European ancestry. |
non-] ancestry. Native Americans, who had already occupied | ||
for millenia the lands that were eyed for U.S. territorial expansion, represented an obstacle to the goals of Manifest Destiny, and thus were forcibly removed | |||
lands, since land could represent potential income, wealth, | |||
through the superior military force of the Federal government. | |||
self-sufficiency, and freedom. | |||
Another desire was the acquisition of new lands, since land could represent potential income, wealth, self-sufficiency, and freedom. This freedom, however, | |||
⚫ | In the 1840s there was a strong sense that the freedoms and ideals |
||
often did not apply to slaveowners, who wished to take their slaves with them | |||
⚫ | of the United States had far reaching importance and needed to be | ||
as part of the Westward expansion. This was an important issue in the case of | |||
Southerners who had settled in Mexico, where slavery was forbidden. Thus the | |||
cause of Manifest Destiny was used to support the seizure of land from Mexico, | |||
particularly in the case of ], and the resulting expansion of slavery into the acquired territory. | |||
⚫ | In the ] there was a strong sense that the freedoms and ideals | ||
⚫ | of the United States, as it applied to white males, had far reaching importance and needed to be | ||
brought to new lands, thereby broadening the nation's reach and | brought to new lands, thereby broadening the nation's reach and | ||
extending its borders. It was a time of American Romanticism, an | extending its borders. It was a time of American Romanticism, an | ||
Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
organic entity full of boundless potential, and progress could be | organic entity full of boundless potential, and progress could be | ||
attained through sincere belief, hard work, and bravery in the face | attained through sincere belief, hard work, and bravery in the face | ||
of great risk and change. The 1830s and '40s had seen a wealth of | of great risk and change. The ] and ] had seen a wealth of | ||
change due to the rapid incorporation of several extremely profound | change due to the rapid incorporation of several extremely profound | ||
technological innovations into society, including the railroad, | technological innovations into society, including the railroad, | ||
the rotary press, and the telegraph. Religious reformation | the rotary press, and the telegraph. ] reformation | ||
movements had spread throughout the nation (perhaps due to | movements had spread throughout the nation (perhaps due to | ||
apprehensions and anxieties about the changes taking place), | apprehensions and anxieties about the changes taking place), | ||
and missionary attitudes and zeal stimulated many to expand the | and missionary attitudes and zeal stimulated many to expand the | ||
reach of |
reach of ] ] into the frontier. | ||
Among all, | Among all, | ||
Line 37: | Line 42: | ||
wrongly) to the superiority of the American Way of Life. | wrongly) to the superiority of the American Way of Life. | ||
Democratic republicanism was felt to be the best form of | Democratic republicanism was felt to be the best form of | ||
government, and was clearly God's plan for mankind, so it was an | government, and was clearly ]'s plan for mankind, so it was an | ||
obligation that it and freedom should be brought to as broad an | obligation that it and freedom should be brought to as broad an | ||
area as possible. To many it seemed a clear and unavoidable | area as possible. To many it seemed a clear and unavoidable | ||
Line 55: | Line 60: | ||
by the increased population from these two effects, providing a | by the increased population from these two effects, providing a | ||
strong pressure for people to move to new regions. Economic | strong pressure for people to move to new regions. Economic | ||
depressions in 1818, 1837, 1839, and 1841 as well as the massive | depressions in ], ], ], and ] as well as the massive | ||
failure of attempts to establish farms in the far northern colonies | failure of attempts to establish farms in the far northern colonies | ||
(such as Vermont) provided strong incentive to take the risk of | (such as Vermont) provided strong incentive to take the risk of | ||
Line 67: | Line 72: | ||
] were virtually void of inhabitants, providing a | ] were virtually void of inhabitants, providing a | ||
historically unusual opportunity to settlers of essentially free | historically unusual opportunity to settlers of essentially free | ||
land. The discovery of South Pass in Wyoming in 1811 had | land. The discovery of South Pass in ] in ] had | ||
established a much more feasible route across the Rockies than | established a much more feasible route across the Rockies than | ||
had been known to Lewis and Clark. | had been known to Lewis and Clark. | ||
Line 91: | Line 96: | ||
land for U.S. settlers. These two effects of Manifest Destiny | land for U.S. settlers. These two effects of Manifest Destiny | ||
have colored its representation in historical hindsight, though | have colored its representation in historical hindsight, though | ||
its supporters argue that if a less democratic, God-fearing | |||
country had been in this situation, the consequences would have | country had been in this situation, the consequences would have | ||
been much more dire and absolute. | been much more dire and absolute. Its critics, however, point out | ||
that the sometimes brutal treatment of Native Americans, including | |||
the infamous ], itself represents a dire and absolute | |||
consequence. | |||
While many African |
While many ]s participated in the westward expansion, | ||
in large part the movement was strongly white-oriented, for a | in large part the movement was strongly white-oriented, for a | ||
variety of reasons. By definition, the settlers were individuals | variety of reasons. By definition, the settlers were individuals | ||
Line 113: | Line 121: | ||
than its promoters could have anticipated. Oregon territory proved | than its promoters could have anticipated. Oregon territory proved | ||
as fertile as expected (although rainier and remoter than | as fertile as expected (although rainier and remoter than | ||
imagined). Discovery of gold in 1849 in California and other | imagined). Discovery of gold in ] in ] and other | ||
mineral wealth elsewhere accelerated growth and the growth of | mineral wealth elsewhere accelerated growth and the growth of | ||
several huge new industrial empires. The turmoil of the Civil War | several huge new industrial empires. The turmoil of the ] | ||
and freeing of the slaves stimulated further migration westward to | and freeing of the slaves stimulated further migration westward to | ||
new lands, and it can be argued that incompatibilities between | new lands, and it can be argued that incompatibilities between | ||
Line 121: | Line 129: | ||
laid at the heart of that conflict. | laid at the heart of that conflict. | ||
More broadly, the |
More broadly, the some would claim that | ||
the ideological justification and the resulting | |||
⚫ | stimulated political reformation movements the world over. |
||
successful growth of the United States represents an outcome of Manifest Destiny | |||
following century would see the democraticazation of hundreds of | |||
⚫ | that stimulated political reformation movements the world over. This | ||
nations around the world (either on their own or with various | reasoning thus attributes to Manifest Destiny the democraticazation of hundreds of nations around the world (either on their own or with various | ||
intensities of encouragement from the United States), even | intensities of encouragement from the United States), even | ||
including such aggressive, authoritarian nations as Germany, Japan, | including such aggressive, authoritarian nations as Germany, Japan, | ||
and the Soviet Union. |
and the Soviet Union. | ||
However, others would argue that the belief that a "superior" race of people | |||
have the right to push out the "inferior" races who lay in the path of | |||
territorial expansion may have had a more insidious influence as well. They | |||
would argue that Manifest Destiny was essentially an ideology of genocide, | |||
and point to parallels with ] ]'s own ideology of territorial | |||
expansion into Europe by a supposedly "superior" race. | |||
The place of the United States of America in today's world is | The place of the United States of America in today's world is | ||
still strongly defined by the |
still strongly defined by the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, even | ||
though its borders have not changed in nearly half a century. | though its borders have not changed in nearly half a century. At | ||
the time of the closure of the frontier at the end of the 19th century, | |||
the U.S. turned its expansionist impulses towards a more global scale; | |||
this led to the ], which garnered overseas | |||
territories for the United States. The U.S. also pursued an actively | |||
interventionist policy throughout ], often for the | |||
sake of promoting governments friendly to the United States. This has | |||
often led to resentment by many people in that part of the world. | |||
In theory, the government of the U.S. still exhibits a desire and motivation to | |||
see the ideals of democracy spread the world over, and feel that | see the ideals of democracy spread the world over, and feel that | ||
successful democratization of a non-democratic nation, or at | successful democratization of a non-democratic nation, or at | ||
least helps preserve or add security to existing democratic nations, adds significant justification to their external military | least helps preserve or add security to existing democratic nations, adds significant justification to their external military | ||
activities. |
activities. However, in practice this has not always turned out to be | ||
the case, such as when the United States supported a ] in ] in ], which overthrew a democratic government and replaced it with | |||
a dictatorship friendly to American interests. Thus critics of Manifest | |||
Destiny argue that the ideology of promoting democracy is a cover for a less noble goal of supporting American economic and political interests even if | |||
democracy is sacrificed. | |||
The expansionist needs of its industrial backbone | |||
still exert themselves in lands outside the United States, often | still exert themselves in lands outside the United States, often | ||
bringing with them the desire (though not always realized) to | bringing with them the desire (though not always realized) to |
Revision as of 21:45, 25 September 2002
Manifest Destiny was a phrase used by politicians and leaders in the United States in the 1840s to justify and promote territorial expansion across the North American continent by providing a sense of mission to citizens. It promoted this sense of mission by fomenting a desire to establish a large empire-like nation in which the ideals of democracy, freedom, and progress are ostensibly protected and promoted across.
In theory, one aspect of this desire was its principle to bring the ideals of democratic self-government to any peoples capable of it; in practice, however, this often meant excluding Native Americans and those with non-European ancestry. Native Americans, who had already occupied for millenia the lands that were eyed for U.S. territorial expansion, represented an obstacle to the goals of Manifest Destiny, and thus were forcibly removed through the superior military force of the Federal government.
Another desire was the acquisition of new lands, since land could represent potential income, wealth, self-sufficiency, and freedom. This freedom, however, often did not apply to slaveowners, who wished to take their slaves with them as part of the Westward expansion. This was an important issue in the case of Southerners who had settled in Mexico, where slavery was forbidden. Thus the cause of Manifest Destiny was used to support the seizure of land from Mexico, particularly in the case of Texas, and the resulting expansion of slavery into the acquired territory.
In the 1840s there was a strong sense that the freedoms and ideals of the United States, as it applied to white males, had far reaching importance and needed to be brought to new lands, thereby broadening the nation's reach and extending its borders. It was a time of American Romanticism, an off-shoot of a more general cultural outlook that emphasized feeling, sentiment, and emotion over science and reason, serving as a reaction to the Age of Enlightenment thought of the previous generation. The world was not a static mechanism with fixed rules and boundaries, according to this new mindset, but rather an organic entity full of boundless potential, and progress could be attained through sincere belief, hard work, and bravery in the face of great risk and change. The 1830s and '40s had seen a wealth of change due to the rapid incorporation of several extremely profound technological innovations into society, including the railroad, the rotary press, and the telegraph. Religious reformation movements had spread throughout the nation (perhaps due to apprehensions and anxieties about the changes taking place), and missionary attitudes and zeal stimulated many to expand the reach of Protestant Christianity into the frontier.
Among all, belief was strong that anything could happen, and anything could be done, and much of this potential was attributed (rightly or wrongly) to the superiority of the American Way of Life. Democratic republicanism was felt to be the best form of government, and was clearly God's plan for mankind, so it was an obligation that it and freedom should be brought to as broad an area as possible. To many it seemed a clear and unavoidable destiny that would eventually reach everywhere, making the United States a leader in agriculture, industry, commerce, the arts and sciences, and all intellectual areas; "Manifest Destiny" could be thought of as an ideal of the "boundlessness of no limits" in all areas, providing a more idealistic rationale for expansion than mere ambition for land.
Several pressures motivated the realization of Manifest Destiny. Birth rates in the East had been high, since large families were considered advantageous for working farms. Immigration was increasing, due to decreased cost and risk for the ocean voyage and the perception that life would be better in the New World than in the Old. The lands of the east were strained by the increased population from these two effects, providing a strong pressure for people to move to new regions. Economic depressions in 1818, 1837, 1839, and 1841 as well as the massive failure of attempts to establish farms in the far northern colonies (such as Vermont) provided strong incentive to take the risk of moving to much more reliable farming lands in the frontier areas.
While these pressures were developing, several macro-opportunities had occurred making realization of the Manifest Destiny possible. The Native American tribes that had held the lands of the west had been decimated by disease over the past century, and so now even especially rich lands such as the Willamette Valley in Oregon were virtually void of inhabitants, providing a historically unusual opportunity to settlers of essentially free land. The discovery of South Pass in Wyoming in 1811 had established a much more feasible route across the Rockies than had been known to Lewis and Clark.
Another key opportunity arose from the massive collapse of the international fur trade. Fur trapping had been the key to opening the west to explorers and the 'mountain men' that traversed the lands to collect the animal pelts for European markets and build huge fortunes for a few early tycoons such as the Astor family. When the industry collapsed, however, the mountain men were forced to find new livelihoods; their knowledge of the western trails and experiences surviving in the wilds provided the invaluable know-how settlers required in order to succeed in the ordeal.
As the citizens of the U.S. spread westward, intense conflict with both the Native Americans and Mexico were inevitable. Already heavily depopulated due to the diseases, the Native American peoples were unable to compete against the encroaching settlers and the advanced military that accompanied them; the rapidity and force of disappearance from the West is one of the major blemishes on American history. Conflict with Mexico was more formal but also resulted in the (perhaps opportunistic) large scale acquisition of land for U.S. settlers. These two effects of Manifest Destiny have colored its representation in historical hindsight, though its supporters argue that if a less democratic, God-fearing country had been in this situation, the consequences would have been much more dire and absolute. Its critics, however, point out that the sometimes brutal treatment of Native Americans, including the infamous Trail of Tears, itself represents a dire and absolute consequence.
While many African Americans participated in the westward expansion, in large part the movement was strongly white-oriented, for a variety of reasons. By definition, the settlers were individuals who had enough wealth to travel but not enough to attain their desires in the East; this therefore excluded the extreme lower classes (such as ex-slaves) and the middle or upper classes (such as slave owners). The swiftness and volume of the migration also did not permit the establishment of institutions that would have fostered investors wishing to create western plantations. The availability of cheap labor in the form of immigrants also prevented the economic viability of slavery in the newly opened lands. In the northern territories there was a strong underlying distaste for slavery, ironically coupled with widespread racism, which made those areas virtually devoid of non-whites.
The subsequent effects of the Manifest Destiny through the end of the 19th century were profound, and perhaps even more far-reaching than its promoters could have anticipated. Oregon territory proved as fertile as expected (although rainier and remoter than imagined). Discovery of gold in 1849 in California and other mineral wealth elsewhere accelerated growth and the growth of several huge new industrial empires. The turmoil of the American Civil War and freeing of the slaves stimulated further migration westward to new lands, and it can be argued that incompatibilities between differing ideals of whether slavery had a part in Manifest Destiny laid at the heart of that conflict.
More broadly, the some would claim that the ideological justification and the resulting successful growth of the United States represents an outcome of Manifest Destiny that stimulated political reformation movements the world over. This reasoning thus attributes to Manifest Destiny the democraticazation of hundreds of nations around the world (either on their own or with various intensities of encouragement from the United States), even including such aggressive, authoritarian nations as Germany, Japan, and the Soviet Union.
However, others would argue that the belief that a "superior" race of people have the right to push out the "inferior" races who lay in the path of territorial expansion may have had a more insidious influence as well. They would argue that Manifest Destiny was essentially an ideology of genocide, and point to parallels with Nazi Germany's own ideology of territorial expansion into Europe by a supposedly "superior" race.
The place of the United States of America in today's world is
still strongly defined by the doctrine of Manifest Destiny, even
though its borders have not changed in nearly half a century. At
the time of the closure of the frontier at the end of the 19th century,
the U.S. turned its expansionist impulses towards a more global scale;
this led to the Spanish-American War, which garnered overseas
territories for the United States. The U.S. also pursued an actively
interventionist policy throughout Latin America, often for the
sake of promoting governments friendly to the United States. This has
often led to resentment by many people in that part of the world.
In theory, the government of the U.S. still exhibits a desire and motivation to see the ideals of democracy spread the world over, and feel that successful democratization of a non-democratic nation, or at least helps preserve or add security to existing democratic nations, adds significant justification to their external military activities. However, in practice this has not always turned out to be the case, such as when the United States supported a coup d'etat in Chile in 1973, which overthrew a democratic government and replaced it with a dictatorship friendly to American interests. Thus critics of Manifest Destiny argue that the ideology of promoting democracy is a cover for a less noble goal of supporting American economic and political interests even if democracy is sacrificed.
The expansionist needs of its industrial backbone still exert themselves in lands outside the United States, often bringing with them the desire (though not always realized) to bring republican democracy and freedom to these places.
See Also:
* Lewis and Clark Expedition * Nationalism * Protestantism * Western * Oregon
Copyright (C) 2002 Bryce Harrington. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.