Revision as of 01:35, 19 September 2009 editSL93 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers78,631 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:12, 22 September 2009 edit undoSaltine (talk | contribs)16,408 edits →NexIRC: closed as redirectNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''redirect''' to ]. Content may be merged into some other appropriate article. ] (]) 09:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
:{{la|NexIRC}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|NexIRC}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
Line 9: | Line 15: | ||
**'''Comment''' The eventual plan was to merge many of these stubs into a larger article. Redirecting to ] would most likely be the easiest thing to do for now. --] (]) 00:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' The eventual plan was to merge many of these stubs into a larger article. Redirecting to ] would most likely be the easiest thing to do for now. --] (]) 00:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
* I second the '''merge''' idea per Tothwolf and Rich --] (]) 01:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | * I second the '''merge''' idea per Tothwolf and Rich --] (]) 01:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Revision as of 09:12, 22 September 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients. Content may be merged into some other appropriate article. Evil saltine (talk) 09:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
NexIRC
- NexIRC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Links to download and review sites are not sources. Requirements and features section are text dumps and prime examples of what doesn't make a good article. What is left after that is the one sentence lead and an infobox. Miami33139 (talk) 04:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
DeleteMerge: I can't find signficiant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)- Merge: to appropriate articles on IRC clients. Rich Farmbrough, 23:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC).
- Comment The eventual plan was to merge many of these stubs into a larger article. Redirecting to Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients#nexIRC would most likely be the easiest thing to do for now. --Tothwolf (talk) 00:18, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- I second the merge idea per Tothwolf and Rich --Mokhov (talk) 01:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.