Misplaced Pages

Thanks

Thanks for supporting me for adminship. The RfA passed today. I look forward to working with you to make Misplaced Pages a better place. --Nlu 04:17, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

i'm sorry psyguy :( i really like wikipedia so i will not make these edits anymore :)

thank you for your hard work — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.156.18.30 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

GraemeL's RFA

Hi Psy guy,

The limit to move a page is 3 days --Abyab 18:15, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Abyab

The limit to move a page is 3 days --Abyab 18:15, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Abyab User Talk:Abyab

Okay. Thanks. I wasn't sure and I could find the answer right off, but I new there was a limit. Thanks again. -- Psy guy 18:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

A Message to Pro-Life Wikipedians

The section "Foetal Pain" (Fetal Pain) has been deleted from the Abortion article. Could you help restore it? If you would like to see what was deleted, go to my talk page, scroll to "Fetal Pain," and click the provided link.--Thomas Aquinas 22:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Hello Psy Guy,

I'm not sure about the studies that have been conducted...I think I had a more NPOV and even more factual version on the actual abortion page before it was reverted, but I do think it is important to add that somewhere. As for your comment of Thomas' page how are you on "different sides of the issue"? Chooserr

Thank You

Thank you sincerely for giving me the PSI Award. Pax Christi.--Thomas Aquinas 20:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

what the hell i vandalize one damn thing and u give me a million damn messags — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.116.65 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, but I can't figure out what you are referring to. I can't see that I have ever left a message on your talk page. -- Psy guy 22:45, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry for vandalising Misplaced Pages, I didn't know you guys were so on to it! I promise not to write anything else bad on Misplaced Pages as I enjoy it's resources and information.

Thanks, Misplaced Pages User — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.25.184 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

New user box

Hello Psy guy, Im SWD316. Im giving you the user box for your user page called Template:User Member. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! SWD316 03:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Tzmerth shmarya

I was just putting in my opinion about it. I think it is/was notable. I guess, as you say, my vote is only 1 keep vs 4 deletes, so the community has spoken. Still makes me wonder tho, since first vote was 4 keeps vs 0 deletes. Does this then become a comulative tally? I am sure that it is a good candidate for undeletion. But I don't care enough about it to do it myself. Zordrac 00:52, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

closing Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kyle and Evan Do The Movies

Psy guy, I question your closing of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kyle and Evan Do The Movies. You had 5 sockpuppets voting "Keep" (Xrockangelx, Kayle101, JaxShores, EarthSage14, Krou88), and one anon masquerading as a registered user ("user:Sir_Rylee", actually user:68.127.103.112). Without these sock votes, you are left with 3 "Keep", 4 "Delete", and one "Neutral". So, at best this would be a "No consensus". Since this still means keeping the article, I don't see a point in opening a request on Misplaced Pages:Deletion review, but in the future, please be more careful when closing an AfD; when you see a name you don't recognize, check their contribution history. If anything looks fishy, check the history page of the AfD voting page as well; as you can see here, it's not difficult to hide a sock or anon vote under another name.

Other than that, keep up the good work! Owen× ☎ 00:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: I voted keep on that page. It looked legitimate to me. I don't see why Psy guy did anything wrong there, since if sock puppets were really there, they only changed the vote from No Consensus to Keep. If you are so concerned, renominate it sometime in the future. Zordrac 02:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD

I noticed that you are a member of this. I myself looked at the whole philosophies, and decided that I am this, Eventualist AND Darwikinist, but that occasionally I swing towards Inclusionism as well as Exopedianism. I am not sure how to go about putting appropriate banners on my user page to reflect that. I'd also like to change my sig to reflect these philosophies. Do you know how to do that? Zordrac 02:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• Note: I don't see why there's a problem with adopting more than one philosophy. They are not all mutually exclusive. I was unable to determine which of the 3 I was not like, as I seem to be 100% like all 3. Zordrac 02:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• What did I do wrong? ] , ]] 02:56, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• Do I have to manually copy and paste every time? Zordrac talk Darwikinist, wishy washy and Eventualist 03:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• I don't see anything wrong with having more than one philosophy either. However, I would caution you about having a complicated signature. Some users frown on that because they take up so much space. Also, I don't know if I understand the last question: "manually copy and paste ...?" If I were you I could at least make the philosophies small in my signature and use transwiki markup rather than external links. Check out the following:

Zordrac • talk (Darwikinist • wishy washy • Eventualist)

That is a little cleaner. To say you from open the edit tab, here is the code for it: ] • ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small>

As for the "banners" .... I assume you mean the userboxed like what are the the top and right of my user and talk page. They are fairly simply to recreate. You are welcome to copy one into my sandbox and change the image and text and play around with userbox formatting if you want to. If you need help, just let me know. -- Psy guy 04:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Okay I am confused about the banner thing, but anyway I guess I will be fine. I was happy to figure out the sig thing. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 05:57, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

awards

i'd like to nominate an administrator for one of your awards. how dow i do this? (sorry, i'm new) -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veej (talk • contribs) 02:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

There is really nothing to it. You just give them the award. What award do you want to give them? If you need help just let me know.-- Psy guy 08:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my userpage. Izehar (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

No problem. Glad to help. -- Psy guy 21:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments on my talk page

Hi Psy guy, Thanks again for the award and comments you left on my talk page. I'm afraid though that you accedientally removed some other comments in the process of you last comment No worries, I think I fixed it. I'll be working on a gallery shortly, as it seems I might need it sooner rather than later. Thanks again, I appreciate the kind words. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 00:34, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Pro-life Alliance

The article Pro-Life Alliance has been nominated for deletion. Chooserr

Oops

Will do -- and my apologies! User:Bcorr 23:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

No problem. These things happen. -- Psy guy 23:08, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Is this IP blocked? Thanks, User:Bcorr 23:16, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Wow -- I'm not keeping up with the evolution of ] :-) Thanks, User:Bcorr 23:22, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Question about signatures

Hi again -- Do you know if there has been some relatively recent change in how MediaWiki renders signatures? for years I have used the following in my preferences with no problem:

BCorr]]</font><font color=chartreuse>|</font>[[User talk:Bcorr|Брайен

and it generated this:

BCorr|Брайен 23:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

For the last couple of weeks (or possibly longer) it now generates what you'll see at the end of this post. I've tried removing the color, the Cyrillic characters, etc., and I can't even get to work with a talk page in there. Please let me know if you have any info or ideas about this.

Thanks, BCorr</font><font color=chartreuse>|</font>] 23:34, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

hey

Friar Xion

I received your message about my extra page. I am terribly sorry about that. I am still familiarizing myself with all the controls. I have edited some pages and familiarized myself with the rules more and I will try to keep that kind of thing down from now on. Thank you for taking care of that.

Pro-life celebrities category up for deletion

Hi, I see that you are listed as a Roman Catholic Wikipedian, well the Pro-life celebrities category is up for deletion. Category:Pro-life celebrities I think this is an interesting and worth while category. Afterall not all celebrities are pro-abortion. Dwain 02:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)