Talk:Astronomical system of units: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:22, 23 September 2009 editIridia (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,154 editsm →Solar mass ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:23, 23 September 2009 edit undoIridia (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,154 editsm →Lunar mass Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:
	*'''Support''' merge into an article on ]. ] ] 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)		*'''Support''' merge into an article on ]. ] ] 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
	*'''Support''' ]'s suggestion. I am not an astronomer but it does not seem useful enough of a unit to keep on its own. ] (]) 15:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)		*'''Support''' ]'s suggestion. I am not an astronomer but it does not seem useful enough of a unit to keep on its own. ] (]) 15:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
			*'''Delete''' This isn't used. The article already has a delete note on its talk page from two years ago. ] (]) 00:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


	===Discussion===		===Discussion===

Revision as of 00:23, 23 September 2009

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement

Astronomy Start‑class High‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Unassessed

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merge other mass articles with this one?

With "concerns" about the stubbyness of some mass articles, should the Solar mass article be merged into this?

Should other mass articles; Jupiter mass, Earth mass, Lunar mass be merged into this article?

This could be done under a heading "Other units used in Astronomy". HarryAlffa (talk) 11:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Solar mass

Oppose I think there is enough out there that it can be kept as a standalone article. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose If there's one "astronomical mass" article that should remain independent, it's this one. The solar mass effectively serves as the standard for all the other masses. Physchim62 (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose This is quite a commonly used mass and the standard for stellar masses in addition to masses of black holes and galaxies. There are enough users who would want to know about solar mass with out the extra 'baggage' of other less commonly used masses. From the stand of precedence all other standard units have their own separate pages. TStein (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose This one is fine by itself. There's a clear distinction in astronomy between the units used at stellar scales and those used at planetary scales. Iridia (talk) 00:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Jupiter mass

Oppose I think there is enough out there that it can be kept as a standalone article. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support merge into an article on planetary mass. Physchim62 (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose: It is used enough for the description of planets to keep as a separate article. Physchim62's idea would work as well. I would prefer both the standalone Jupiter mass and the planetary mass.TStein (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Earth mass

Neutral 76.66.196.139 (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support merge into an article on planetary mass. Physchim62 (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Physchim62's suggestion. I am not an astronomer but it does not seem useful enough of a unit to keep on its own. TStein (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Lunar mass

Support though the article currently says it is about the IAU defined units... perhaps two articles are in order, one for the IAU units, and one for other units... 76.66.196.139 (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support merge into an article on planetary mass. Physchim62 (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Physchim62's suggestion. I am not an astronomer but it does not seem useful enough of a unit to keep on its own. TStein (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Delete This isn't used. The article already has a delete note on its talk page from two years ago. Iridia (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

I would prefer a separate article on planetary mass rather than merging them here: they are empirical quantities rather than a system of units. Physchim62 (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good to me.TStein (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Is the mass of Jupiter an IAU standard? I didn't see it listed in the referenced document.—RJH (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

The mass of Jupiter is not a standard. The best estimates come from it being an adjusted parameter in solar system ephemerides, in which the unit of mass is the solar mass. You can also create separate "Jovian" ephemerides, but I think the accuracy of these is much less that the ones based on the solar system as a whole. Physchim62 (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories: