Misplaced Pages

Stem Cell Research: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:50, 17 December 2005 view sourcePiedras grandes (talk | contribs)296 editsNo edit summary  Revision as of 04:50, 17 December 2005 view source Piedras grandes (talk | contribs)296 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
==Debates== ==Debates==
Currentlty many political opportunists look for ways to apease mainstreame scientists by allowing for the death of human children to advance horrific research Currentlty many political opportunists look for ways to apease mainstreame scientists by allowing for the death of human children to advance horrific research
{{pro-life-stub}}

Revision as of 04:50, 17 December 2005

Facts

Embryo stem cell research requires scientists to destroy living human embryos in order to harvest stem cells.

Embryo stem cell research is completely unnecessary, as stem cells taken from other sources have proven more effective in treating diseases.

Every human life starts at the moment of conception. Every tiny human embryo has a unique genetic blueprint that has already decided if they will be a boy or a girl and if they will have blue, green or brown eyes. These are facts that some researchers and politicians are hoping we forget.

Every time stem cells are removed from a human embryo, a unique human life is ended.

The fact that human embryos are being sacrificed without their consent is even more alarming when alternative, life-affirming forms of stem cell research are already providing cures to many human ailments.

Debates

Currentlty many political opportunists look for ways to apease mainstreame scientists by allowing for the death of human children to advance horrific research Template:Pro-life-stub