Revision as of 15:55, 30 September 2009 view sourceMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive 19.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:59, 30 September 2009 view source Kww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits →Bambifan101: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
Please see . ] (]) 09:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | Please see . ] (]) 09:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Bambifan101 == | |||
What's your position on the proxying issue? I'm taken aback at the number of people that don't seem to consider the edits to be a problem.—](]) 15:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:59, 30 September 2009
This is PMDrive1061's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
A Cookie is just not enough...
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
This is for all your hard work in just the past week, kicking out the most annoying sockpuppet ever to ruin a Disney article! Your diligence has definitely made it a lot easier for the rest of us to actually do some editing. Cheers, and keep up the good work! Cactusjump (talk) |
tin Cup Oil Field
Hey I just started the article, why dont you just hold on a second. When I get done it will have quite a lot of information, that is both useful and helpful
== Thanks, that is helpful, I was just getting the documetns to upload
Unidentified content deleted without rationale
You recent addded an entry to my talk page. Could you please state explicitly what you deleted, and what specifically is the basis for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikemaccana (talk • contribs)
Ok!
I will not continue but can you please let me have the code back to the article i was almost done! Also if it is illegal do not get mad at me. Like i said more than once i'm writing a paper sorry if that broke any rules :(
Accidental deletion of Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park Camp Resorts involving page moves
Moved to User talk:Emmette Hernandez Coleman#Question for administrator 2
BF101: Reply
Another one bites the dust! Heh heh Cactusjump (talk) 16:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sigh, the aggrevation is back again and managed to con another good editor into doing edits for him! User:Ice Age lover and User:207.201.216.12 are the socks. I've sent to AIV and I think I got the latest round of stuff cleaned up. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I see that you have semi-protected or protected a lot of articles. I don't know the history behind this Bambifan101 sockpuppet master so I won't tell you what to do, but I'm wondering, is it really necessary to FULLY protect some of those articles until December 2009? Gary King (talk) 04:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- He's been at this for over a year, using IP and named socked including ranges no one will range block because of collateral damage. 120+ confirmed socks, and another 109 highly likely just not tagged confirmed (mostly the IPs) Semi-protecting his targets has been the only thing that had any effect in slowing his efforts (and now he's taken to trying to trick established editors into doing edits for him or getting them to make unprotection requests). See Misplaced Pages:Long term abuse#Bambifan101 for a longer summary. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 04:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm talking about FULLY protected articles. Us regulars can't edit them, only admins can. Gary King (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- You issued full protection on several articles, including Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders, Garfield's Fun Fest, Kung Fu Panda, The Penguins of Madagascar, and dozens more. Gary King (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I assure you that I cannot edit them. Gary King (talk) 05:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it's not a software bug. If you check your contributions, you can find the articles that you marked as fully protected by searching for the string "edit=sysop". Gary King (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- (Chiming in) I agree that the ones mentioned by Gary King above are all fully-protected. If I, as an admin, click "edit" on Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders, I get the usual text: "WARNING: This page has been protected so that only administrators can edit it. Please ensure that you are following the protection policy." I get the log entry "02:29, 29 June 2009 PMDrive1061 (talk | contribs | block) protected Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders (expires 02:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)) (expires 02:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)) (Excessive vandalism: Bambifan101 target) (hist | change)" (emphasis added), and I get the pink background to the editing box indicating a fully-protected page. Bencherlite 06:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I assure you that I cannot edit them. Gary King (talk) 05:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- You issued full protection on several articles, including Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders, Garfield's Fun Fest, Kung Fu Panda, The Penguins of Madagascar, and dozens more. Gary King (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm talking about FULLY protected articles. Us regulars can't edit them, only admins can. Gary King (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't have a particular article that I'd like to get unprotected at the moment, no. I just noticed that one of the articles I was watching was fully protected, which I found extremely odd considering it gets one or two edits a month on average. I can wait until you are able to drop the fully protected articles down to semi-protection. There are roughly 40 pages that you have fully protected recently. Gary King (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Vandalism will always be a threat. I don't really see how placing dozens or even hundreds of articles under semi-protection will solve anything, since persistent vandals, like how you described this one in particular, will always find an unprotected article to vandalize if they feel like it. Gary King (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Bump? Gary King (talk) 18:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard#Requesting_that_several_fully_protected_articles_be_unprotected Gary King (talk) 03:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Only Magic Carpet (Aladdin) and Talk:Kronk's New Groove are left. Gary King (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- scream* its bad enough dealing with that idiot kid and his socks, but now another sockpuppetter is being a pain in the ass and encouraging OckhamTheFox's continued proxy editing. I've posted at ANI and there is an open SPI, but this is getting so annoying. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
The protection on The Fox and the Hound appears to have expired, and it was hit again almost immediately. Looks like he may have a new IP range and is quick hopping between IPs. Guess he went traveling again...ugh. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Question
Earlier today I closed an Mfd (Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Allsterecho talk redirects) that I had voted in. Usually you shouldn't do this, however, the result was "speedy delete" and was carried out by Graeme Bartlett. Obviously, as I am not an admin, I didn't delete it myself. I only closed it because Graeme seemed to have forgotten. Do you think this will come back to bite me later on? -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, okay, thanks. :) As to Bambifan, I appreciate the accolades, but I'm not sure that I did anything to deserve them. Maybe it was Collectian? Or perhaps I did and forgot, as this has happened in the past. Either way, I appreciate it. :) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, perhaps I was. Today has been crazy and I've been all over the place, so I probably just don't remember. I've had the privilege of running into several of his socks, and must agree with you, that I do pity him, as he's more sad than anything else. Haven't seen you around lately but hope to see you more active in the future as you are quite an asset to this site. Cheers! -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 04:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
user:Littleboy o.O
THANK YOU. That little guy was the most annoying vandal I've had to deal with in quite a while. I am so incredibly pleased to see him blocked. :) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 00:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
XOP Networks Page Deletion
The recently created wikipedia page for XOP Networks was subject to speedy deletion. I justified the existence of the page by saying it was not created for promotion or vandalism. Please let me know if it is safe to begin editing the page under this new user name which more clearly identifies me as an individual, not a company associate. (I am not employed by XOP Networks, nor do I have any intention of promoting their products.) I simply wanted to begin their encyclopedia page so that others may learn about the company's history, founding, and miscellaneous facts. Again, I just want to know if I can safely make edits to this page under my new user name.
Thanks, Chirag Gupta
hello..
I'm new I was just wondering if I can put up some factual information about my band.
The World Wasn't Meant page deletion
Hello. I recently created a page for the webcomic The World Wasn't Meant. I believe it was deleted for lack of third party links/information which would verify its significance. I have links to various third party articles (reviews, etc) that I was hoping to include, but was unsure where to include them. I am new to editing Misplaced Pages. Is there some way to include these third party links, even if you are not specifically mentioning them in the body of the article? Perhaps they go in the reference section?
Thanks.
Adrenalin-NY Deleted Page
Hi,
I was hoping to continue to work on my page. I have not had time to include my references. Is it that as soon as I start a page I have to finish it.
I was under the impression that I could create a page and then return to edit it at a later date. In any case I am hoping that you can reinstate my page so that I can continue working on it.
thx for the help
thank you if u need help ask him
Pisaware
Sir,really i was talking about a historical place.Pisaware was a village where a knight Krishnaji Bandal was living.He was against the empire of Marathas.He was killed by Shivaji Maharaj but his son was working for him.And the battle of Pawan Khind is Historical one so this place and people must have a place in wikipedia.but if you feel it is vague then i am very sorry for writing such information please forgive me and would like to write again on an old temple with photos,would you like to guide me? santosh
MT6235 Processor
I was just going to add to the content when you wiped it out. There is no information on this processor on the Internet and aggregating it is a huge task.
Trying to do a favor for my fellow man here, I posted what little I had at first.
I have more now:
MT6235consists of the following subsystems: Microcontroller Unit (MCU) Subsystem: includes an ARM926EJ-S RISC processor and its accompanying memory management and interrupt handling logics; Digital Signal Processor (DSP) Subsystem: includes a DSP and its accompanying memory, memory controller, and interrupt controller; MCU/DSP Interface: the junction at which the MCU and the DSP exchange hardware and software information; Microcontroller Peripherals: includes all user interface modules and RF control interface modules; Microcontroller Coprocessors: runs computing-intensive processes in place of the Microcontroller; DSP Peripherals: hardware accelerators for GSM/GPRS/EDGE channel codec; Multi-media Subsystem: integrates several advanced accelerators to support multi-media applications; Voice Front End: the data path for converting analog speech to and from digital speech; Audio Front End: the data path for converting stereo audio from an audio source; Baseband Front End: the data path for converting a digital signal to and from an analog signal from the RF modules; Timing Generator: generates the control signals related to the TDMA frame timing; and, Power, Reset and Clock Subsystem: manages the power, reset, and clock distribution inside MT6235.
From http://ryan.com.br/smf/index.php?topic=481.75;wap2 and http://blog.csdn.net/sergeycao/archive/2008/08/26/2832568.aspx
As well, I was going to do a writeup.
Why was this wiped out?
Immediate deletion of page
Hi,
Sorry to be a bother but I just created a page for a person in the media, Alex Hooper-Hodson and it was instantly deleted. I can provide the appropriate online references i.e. links to major newspapers sites and articles written by him to verify he falls into the category of a notable person. Other family members of his are on Misplaced Pages and he has a very similar career with appropriately important instances that can be referenced. I am not writing this entry due to knowing him or any other reason but just I heard he's finally stopped working at my favourite magazine and thought he deserved a Misplaced Pages entry for all his good work at my favourite magazine.
Can you advise how I should proceed?
Morella
Bambifan
Hey, I saw your comments on simple wiki and I thought I'd drop you a line, from what I can tell there hasn't been any type of formal complaints to the ISP for Bambi though he definitely the requirements for WP:Abuse Response. We're starting to get nearer the end of our rebuild of the old Abuse Report system and while we haven't done usernames yet we have definitely talked about the possibility. We would need to get check users involved of course and while the privacy policy has a specific clause allowing the release of the IP to help contact ISPs I would guess they may want to wait until we're a little more set up before they did something like that. We haven't put together an official policy on how to do usernames yet though my thoughts when talking to BSmithme has been to create an abuse report and then present that to the Checkusers as the reason we need the IPs to contact the ISPs. I'd be happy to work with you trying to get a report together if you'd like. Jamesofur (talk) 04:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
75.47 IP
Just a FYI - that IP is actually permablocked user User:I-10 and can be blocked on sight. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
IP vandal
Hey PMDrive, regarding the warning you left here, please have a look at the talk history: after I left a warning earlier, User:Doniago left a "final" warning. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
LG Viewty Smart (GC900)
Any specific reason why you've deleted this article?
Thank you
Hi
I just wanted to say thank you for helping deal with user 216.165.33.90. I've no idea why they said that I should include an edit summary to explain why I was reverting their edits. Personally I would've thought that Twinkle posting it was reverting vandalism was enough!
I did actually check what Misplaced Pages said on the articles he was vandalising and compared it to what Google found. Funnily enough Google agrees with all of my reverts.
It's the first time I've come across such a serial vandaliser like that. Is there any tips that you have in dealing with serial vandalisers? --5 albert square (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Hey thanks for the tips. I kind of stumbled across the guy accidentally when I was checking the anon IPs contributions list, noticed that John was dealing with it, but there were quite a lot of edits coming in so thought I'd lend a hand. I'm guessing by the fact that he posted on the Misplaced Pages Protection Page, that he must've been following me around Misplaced Pages undoing all my edits, really annoys me when people intentionally vandalise the encyclopedia.
Thanks again for the advice :) --5 albert square (talk) 02:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for your help with User:toejam1101, It really annoys me when people work against all the good work we are doing here on wikipedia! kiwiteen123 (talk) 02:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted Page: "The Phuture That Never Happened"
I don't understand why you deleted this page. I Know I didn't fill it with a lot of text, but I am not good at writing, so I leave this to other persons..
I am new to editing here, but I have used Misplaced Pages as a sourche for many years now. Tracklistings on other albums have been very useful for me, when trying to find out more about an artist/groups relases. So I thought I would contribute a bit, especially on albums that I have bought and that are a bit difficult to find information about.
Please reconsider you deletion of the page.
If not, you should probably delete the link to this page from the artist "Mental Overdrive".
Sincerely Super ted77 (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Black Pearl (ship)
When you deleted this page as a copyvio, you neglected to also take care of the "what links here" stuff. Now the creator is fighting to keep what appears to be an identical article at Brigantine Black Pearl. There's also a copy on their user talk page. Would you mind seeing if they are the same and take appropriate action? 98.248.33.198 (talk) 02:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Blind reverts
Hello, while the vandal IP has made a rather big mess of the Armenian-Azeri articles lately, I caution you to refrain from making blind reverts in instances where he has removed the Azeri name. There are no third-party sources to support their inclusion so the mere fact that a sockpuppet is making these edits does not excuse their validity. Most, if not all, of those names don't belong there. I'm telling you this as an editor who has wide experience in this and it's generally preferable that you rollback at least some of your reverts. Thanks for understanding. Regards.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 04:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think mass removal of Azerbaijani names was justified. Each case should be discussed separately, and arguments for removal must be presented and discussed. I see no reason for removal of vast majority of those names. Grandmaster 19:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I see nothing wrong with what you did. Any edits by socks must be reverted on spot. If anyone wishes to implement those changes, he must make them as a registered user and take full responsibility for them. So thank you for your interference. Grandmaster 04:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't see why my drinking game "Turtle Master (drinking game)" isn't as valid as any other drinking game... why can't it be included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mct3545 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment
Hi, I am happy to see that you liked your barnstar. Thank you for your comment on my talk page. I was wondering if you can help me out with this unregister user on the discussion page of the article. I am trying to explain things to him, but user it is not up to understand. User used the words 'slap yourself with it' and called Pinchas, the honored zealot from the Bible, " PinkAss". That type of contribution is very hard to be acceptable. If you can, visit the discussion page of the Talk:Y-chromosomal Aaron and agree with their. I will appreciate it! Regards - --MCohenNY (talk) 02:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
dot's back
dot's back with a new IP range to monitor with a ton of bad edits. Looks like 78.16.x.x (today was 78.16.219.126). Any more thoughts on getting a range block for this and/or that other common one we've had? SpikeJones (talk) 03:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Teletubbies
Please see this. Meursault2004 (talk) 09:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Bambifan101
What's your position on the proxying issue? I'm taken aback at the number of people that don't seem to consider the edits to be a problem.—Kww(talk) 15:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)