| Revision as of 12:11, 2 October 2009 editS Marshall (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers32,385 edits A question← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:19, 2 October 2009 edit undoKww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits →Stealth BanjoNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| While tolerably well written, this is essentially a promotion for one model of one maker's instrument. There doesn't seem to be anything specifically notable about this instrument. The 5th string design, while well executed, is not unique. —](]) 11:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | While tolerably well written, this is essentially a promotion for one model of one maker's instrument. There doesn't seem to be anything specifically notable about this instrument. The 5th string design, while well executed, is not unique. —](]) 11:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *Per ], alternatives to deletion should normally be exhausted before an article is brought to AfD. In this case, I don't yet see why Kww has rejected the idea of a merge to the "variants" section of ]. Why's that, Kww?—] ]/] 12:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | *Per ], alternatives to deletion should normally be exhausted before an article is brought to AfD. In this case, I don't yet see why Kww has rejected the idea of a merge to the "variants" section of ]. Why's that, Kww?—] ]/] 12:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :*Because there isn't anything notable enough about this intrument to warrant a mention by name. The technique used for the fifth string is mentioned in ], and properly credited to F.C Wilkes in the 1890's. There have been thousands of banjo makers with tens of thousands of different models. We don't list them individually.—](]) 12:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:19, 2 October 2009
Stealth Banjo
- Stealth Banjo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While tolerably well written, this is essentially a promotion for one model of one maker's instrument. There doesn't seem to be anything specifically notable about this instrument. The 5th string design, while well executed, is not unique. —Kww(talk) 11:52, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Per WP:BEFORE, alternatives to deletion should normally be exhausted before an article is brought to AfD. In this case, I don't yet see why Kww has rejected the idea of a merge to the "variants" section of Banjo. Why's that, Kww?—S Marshall /Cont 12:11, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Because there isn't anything notable enough about this intrument to warrant a mention by name. The technique used for the fifth string is mentioned in banjo, and properly credited to F.C Wilkes in the 1890's. There have been thousands of banjo makers with tens of thousands of different models. We don't list them individually.—Kww(talk) 12:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)