| Revision as of 22:02, 2 October 2009 editChildofMidnight (talk | contribs)43,041 edits →Low key: copy-edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:40, 2 October 2009 edit undoJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits →Low key: request for the user to answer questionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Thank you for owning up to your actions. Do you now recognize the problem you participated in? Will you be wiser in the future and avoid helping friends (or others) to violate policy? ] <sup>]</sup> 10:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | Thank you for owning up to your actions. Do you now recognize the problem you participated in? Will you be wiser in the future and avoid helping friends (or others) to violate policy? ] <sup>]</sup> 10:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :I've participated in lots of RfAs and very rarely have I seen candidates asked if they have histories with other accounts on Misplaced Pages. So it seems strange set up a system where we encourage editors to start over with new identities, don't expect editors to be forthright about their histories, and then point the finger at those who don't disclose "what they know". I'm not even sure it's a good idea to try to prevent editors from getting fresh starts. Why not just focus on rooting out collusion, corruption, and damage to the encyclopedia? I don't see any from the present circumstances, except for all the drahmaz instigated by those looking to settle scores. If there's a policy discussion to be had it should be separate from the present controversy. I am a strong supporter of greater leniency and giving editors a chance to clear their records so there wouldn't be a need for deception or the creating of new identities. ] (]) 20:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | :I've participated in lots of RfAs and very rarely have I seen candidates asked if they have histories with other accounts on Misplaced Pages. So it seems strange set up a system where we encourage editors to start over with new identities, don't expect editors to be forthright about their histories, and then point the finger at those who don't disclose "what they know". I'm not even sure it's a good idea to try to prevent editors from getting fresh starts. Why not just focus on rooting out collusion, corruption, and damage to the encyclopedia? I don't see any from the present circumstances, except for all the drahmaz instigated by those looking to settle scores. If there's a policy discussion to be had it should be separate from the present controversy. I am a strong supporter of greater leniency and giving editors a chance to clear their records so there wouldn't be a need for deception or the creating of new identities. ] (]) 20:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::Are you an alternative account of Jayron32? If not, please let him answer the questions himself. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:40, 2 October 2009
| This is Jayron32's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives |
|
/Archive for Sept-Dec 2006 |
Low key
Thank you for owning up to your actions. Do you now recognize the problem you participated in? Will you be wiser in the future and avoid helping friends (or others) to violate policy? Jehochman 10:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- I've participated in lots of RfAs and very rarely have I seen candidates asked if they have histories with other accounts on Misplaced Pages. So it seems strange set up a system where we encourage editors to start over with new identities, don't expect editors to be forthright about their histories, and then point the finger at those who don't disclose "what they know". I'm not even sure it's a good idea to try to prevent editors from getting fresh starts. Why not just focus on rooting out collusion, corruption, and damage to the encyclopedia? I don't see any from the present circumstances, except for all the drahmaz instigated by those looking to settle scores. If there's a policy discussion to be had it should be separate from the present controversy. I am a strong supporter of greater leniency and giving editors a chance to clear their records so there wouldn't be a need for deception or the creating of new identities. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:17, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Are you an alternative account of Jayron32? If not, please let him answer the questions himself. Jehochman 23:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)