| Revision as of 13:36, 6 October 2009 editWngLdr34 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users836 edits →Zero History← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:39, 6 October 2009 edit undoMandsford (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators68,454 edits →Zero HistoryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *'''Redir''' to ] since it will be a valid search term. -- ] (]) - 09:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | *'''Redir''' to ] since it will be a valid search term. -- ] (]) - 09:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Clear ] Violation right there.--] (]) 13:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Clear ] Violation right there.--] (]) 13:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Redirect''' to ], where if it's not mentioned, it should be. I agree with Liefting that it's a likely search term. ] (]) 13:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:39, 6 October 2009
Zero History
- Zero History (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Upcoming book with apparently zero history of notability assertion. Of the four references, one is the author's blog, and the other three are about the author, not about the book. Delete without prejudice against recreation once the book becomes a hit. Blanchardb -- timed 03:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. The report initially came from Twitter, apparently - that's a source that's about as reliable as any old word on the street, which is to say 'not at all'. Article is pure crystalballery in the meantime. Once Gibson releases it 'and' it becomes notable, we'll talk. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:54, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redir to William Gibson since it will be a valid search term. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clear WP:CRYSTALBALL Violation right there.--Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 13:36, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to William Gibson, where if it's not mentioned, it should be. I agree with Liefting that it's a likely search term. Mandsford (talk) 13:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)